Same crash with 0.91.2 (and the latest git version) here, 0.88 seems to work just fine. Was there any feedback from your ticket?

That's not what I read in Jeff's answer. He's just telling the truth: Migrating to a new forum will be tough if you don't make a hard cut.

Is the site down? What's the current state?

I really like the idea. But it would be nice if there was an option to create bounties for bugs or feature requests independently of github.

I wonder if it would be feasible to include the hash to timestamp in the input and not in the output.

Let's assume we would change scriptSig to

timestampScriptSig:

and under the conditions that
1. The so modified input is still able to claim the output

and optional these nice to have features
2. ideally also signs the
3. the output can be empty (i.e. the whole BTC input amount is the transaction fee)

This would come with the following advantages: It does not burn any bitcoins. The transaction fee is an incentive for miners to include the transaction. And finally: You only need one transaction.

Can anyone comment if it's possible that also signs (maybe with OP_CODESEPARATOR)? Is a transaction containing timestampScriptSig a valid transaction with bitcoin 0.8.3? Would it, together with , be included in the blockchain?

It seems like laybit has been put on hold. What's the current status?

If I get my reward faster then there is a financial incentive from finding a sponsor at the top of the pyramid.

http://www.pyramining.com/referral/2ne4dk7mg    2012-08-30 10:15:41 UTC    still active
http://pyramining.com/referral/pg8s2e7kz    2012-09-02 12:29:19 UTC    still active

Add me too, pls.

@DeepBit: Is it ok to have two (or more) miners running under the same worker account? Or will this cause trouble?

First, let me say that PayPal has an OTP mechanism, at least in Germany, where you can sign in via on SMS OTP. And I am pretty sure that it's not just germany where you can do this. They also sold token generators, not sure if they still sell them. But I don't understand why the Paypal scams have to be the problem of the trading site? Why don't you tell your users that there is a high risk if they trade bitcoins against Paypal money? Everyone is free to choose what they accept as payment, including the pros and cons. A rating system will also likely reduce the amount of scam, while it sure can't prevent it entirely.
On the other hand, I don't like Paypal. Because of their handling with wikileaks, because they freeze money for no reasons (there are serveral cases her in germany), because of the cuban export control, because they are a monopolist, because of various other reasons. I try to avoid Paypal where possible and never used it with bitmarket. So I don't really care

I'm an neutral on the first changes. But introducing a fee and excluding "the most loyal users" is plain wrong. You give gifts to the high volume traders who already make some money with the trading and scare away the low volume/one time traders, which are the clients of the high volume traders. How is this fair?
There are two primary reasons I use bitmarket to trade a low amount once in a while:

• I can use SEPA\local wire transfers
• It's free of charge

Please exclude at least SEPA/local wire transfer from the fees or keep the fees here at a minimum.

I also don't think that this is a good idea, because the accounts could be taken back by their owners giving them a bad reputation. It would be better to introduce a rating system.

Flow

@WARlrus: Any news on when the site is going to come back online?
Don't wan't to bug you, is just that I liked the site very much and I want to place bets again.

Das sehe ich nicht so.

"Bürger stehen auf" bietet ja zur Zeit fast nur top Phrasen. Hier mal ein paar Highlights:

• Wir sind für Zukunftsvisionen.
• Wir sind für ein freies Europa, in dem die europäischen Bürger das Sagen haben.
• Wir sind für neue Perspektiven für unser Land.
• Wir sind gegen die sozialistische Einheitsbreipartei CDU/CSU-SPD-FDP-GRÜNE-LINKE.
• Wir sind keine "Braune-Soße"-Partei und keine Ewig-Gestrigen.
• Wir sind keine Vertreter des Klimaschwindels von der angeblich menschengemachten Erderwärmung durch CO2.
• Wir sind für echten Umweltschutz.
• Wir sind für eine stolze, aufrechte Rolle Deutschlands im Reigen der europäischen Völker.

Quelle

Liest sich eher wie der Einheitsbrei jeder "leicht" rechten, aber "wir sind anders rechts", Protestpartei voller "ich bin mit der Gesamtsituation unzufrieden" Mitglieder. Mal schauen ob die Community von "Bürger stehen auf" da noch etwas mehr Substanz bringt. Man darf gespannt sein.

Flow

Update: thanks to bitcoin-dev, they pointed me to the right direction.

The old tar.gz for 0.19.0 did contain full sources to build bitcoin. What happened there in the new versions? I'd like to built bitcoin from source.

Also delivering a tar.gz with sources for every release would be nice for source based linux distributions.

Flow

How do I issue the RPC from command line?

Edit: Found it. Just set the user name and password in bitcoind.conf and run bitcoind with the given RPC command. Thanks all!

Thanks. But I prefer a persistent option, because the binary will still spawn 4 miner threads, when I want only 2.
Just wondering that there is a option in the GUI, which is not represented anywhere else. :-(

I see this option in the GUI, but could not found the corresponding line in the command options nor the bitcoin.conf. I would like to run bitcoin on my server, which has no GUI available.

Flow

Is it not possible to forward two ports for bitcoin? E.g. 8333 and 8334 and announce this ports in the distributed database, like bittorrent does?

Flow