Most crypto projects evolve accidentally through community decisions. The Grand Plan is different — it's a self-refining strategy, not just a coin.

It actively tests and evolves its own growth methods (message variants, forks, utility incentives), using memetic and behavioral feedback loops. So while the code stays static, the system itself is designed to improve — not just wait for developers or hype.

Think of it as:

Bitcoin = passive evolution
The Grand Plan = engineered recursive evolution

Good point — at first glance, “spreading the strategy” might sound like typical shill behavior, but it’s actually something different.

The idea isn’t to spam everyone or blindly hype the coin — it’s to explore and refine communication pathways. By testing different message variants, you can identify which approaches resonate, why they work, and iterate toward the most effective strategies. It’s closer to A/B testing at scale, not spam.

The Grand Plan treats every message as a data point — part of a live optimization loop. This allows the system to organically discover what works in different social contexts, rather than relying on a static pitch or influencer campaign. It's a method borrowed from machine learning and growth hacking, not hype culture.

So the spreading of the strategy is actually part of the recursive self-improvement, because it leads to better versions of itself over time. And importantly, it doesn’t require everyone to do it — just enough people trying different angles for natural selection to do its work.

To be clear, the system isn’t using AI or modifying its own codebase. The ‘recursive self-improvement’ is more about the ecosystem growing through human participation — basically a Darwinian ‘survival of the fittest’ for forks, usage patterns, and hosted services. The code itself stays static unless someone edits it — and those edits only matter if the fork becomes dominant.

Hey everyone,

While digging through some crypto GitHub repos, I stumbled upon something unusual — a document called “The Grand Plan.” It outlines Steps 1 through 3 clearly, but Step 4 seems to be corrupted or missing. The plan itself looks like a recursive self-improving system designed to grow a cryptocurrency organically.

I’m curious if you think this is a viable strategy? Also, what do you think a plausible Step 4 could be, given what’s written so far?

Here’s what I gathered so far:

• Step 1 involves spreading the strategy itself through multiple message types.
  
  Step 2 talks about incentivizing mining and forks for evolution.
  
  Step 3 anticipates growth in blockchain servers with user reviews.
  
  Would love to hear your take on this and ideas for what Step 4 might have been!

Thanks!