To address what seems to be becoming a point of confusion, the avatar is entirely non-pornographic, contrary to OP's assertion that it is somehow "sexualised". If you find yourself spending a little too much time thinking about the saddle's proximity to my naked sweaty hind parts, that's on you. (Well, unless you were thinking about that one time I suffered an
anatomically implausible cycling accident, but that was fillippone's fault, not mine.

)
The actual pornography associated with the Merit Cycling Club is typified by the celebratory anniversary threads I post every year, most recently
this one (
NSFW). Admittedly it's just my fursona posing suggestively, but I think this particular suggestion is sufficient to meet the criteria for pornography (certainly I agree that mere nudity doesn't).