Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 29 results by FuzzyCoins
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ixcoin - a new Bitcoin fork
by
FuzzyCoins
on 11/08/2011, 01:32:02 UTC
Seriously though, if A LOT of new chains were to start with the variables tweaked a bit wouldn't that just make Bitcoin stronger? You would have hundreds of tiny ones but only one big one. It would be hard for any of the small ones to really steal the market as they would be competing with so many others. Bitcoin has the advantage of being way ahead of the rest.
The problem is building an economy with lots of different chains. It is hard enough for general adoption and agreement on the value of a coin with just one chain and kind of coin. If there are a hundred chains and different people all have a hundred different kinds of virtual coins, how do you know what your coins are worth? It makes the world of exchanges very complicated.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: global economic collapse
by
FuzzyCoins
on 10/08/2011, 01:46:55 UTC
When this happens bitcoins should be worth alot. While others are sad, and out of money we will be the ones with the valuable currency
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjv-MtGpj2U.
If there is a global economic collapse I think that people will value physical commodities over virtual ones. It is unclear if people will use virtual commodities to remotely exchange physical ones in times of crisis.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: What's the quickest way to put funds into MtGox acct?
by
FuzzyCoins
on 09/08/2011, 05:31:56 UTC
FFS it takes like 3 days to transfer from bank acct to Dwolla.  Then another 3 or so days from Dwolla to MtGox.  So nearly a week before the funds actually show up a MtGox account.  Is there a quicker way?
Wiring money would probably be faster, but a lot more expensive.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Make No Mistake: MyBitcoin is NOT Back Up!
by
FuzzyCoins
on 05/08/2011, 18:00:36 UTC
Can I just ask what can be done about this legally ?
Depends. Did you have a legal contract with mybitcoin (or anyone for that matter) that said if you deposit the coins you would get them back? Or... Did you just send your coins to an unknown party and hope that they would be nice and reciprocate by returning your coins? If you don't have a legal contract, perhaps you just gifted your coins away.

If you are looking for legal remedy, you have to specify what laws or contracts were broken. I don't see any laws or contracts broken.

I realize that this might not be the moral answer, but it is probably the legal answer. I am not a lawyer so take it for what it is.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [~2700 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fees, LP, SSL, API, 8 Decimal Payouts and more!
by
FuzzyCoins
on 18/07/2011, 02:28:43 UTC
... any chance on adding the ability to set a local timezone for displaying times?  apparently I cannot subtract 5 hours in my head...  or is it 4 lol
Local timezones would be nice. Displaying the current time in UTC on the block statistics page wouldn't be as nice, but it would be easy... (and helpful)
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [~2700 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fees, LP, SSL, API, Full Decimal Payouts and more
by
FuzzyCoins
on 10/07/2011, 16:40:49 UTC
Currently seeing idles on us.btcguild.com. Not seeing idles on useast.btcguild.com. In case it is a DNS caching issue I currently see US as 69.42.216.173 and USEAST as 69.233.243.147
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [~3000 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fees, Long polling, SSL, JSON API, and more
by
FuzzyCoins
on 04/07/2011, 08:02:25 UTC
...  Failover when a sub-pool crashes takes about 4-6 seconds to kick in, meaning you can point your miners at one IP and it will automatically put them at an internal pool. ... 
So it sounds like you are collapsing the multiple names (uswest, useast, uscentral) down to a single address with multiple servers behind it. If this is the case, please post the DNS name of this "one IP" as soon as possible so that we can get our miners reconfigured. (And point that DNS somewhere useful in the meantime... )

Thanks for the hard work.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Transaction fees and speeding up transactions
by
FuzzyCoins
on 04/07/2011, 03:30:43 UTC
The point I'm getting at here, in a nutshell, is, can we reliably process transactions less than, say $50, in 5 seconds or less, or not?
It depends on what you mean by "reliably", but if you mean that the merchant has 100% confidence that they will get their money, the answer is no. The protocol just doesn't work that way.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Metal Engraved Keypair Cards! Coming soon!
by
FuzzyCoins
on 29/06/2011, 00:27:51 UTC
If this is a cute way of publishing your public address as a way to receive BTC then it is cute, maybe even classy.

If it is supposed to be a way to send money, then it is useless (or at least insecure). If the private key is printed on it (as a set of numbers or QR code or whatever) then all I have to do to steal the BTC is look at it, maybe even from a distance. I can use a camera with a telephoto lens and take a picture of you holding your card. As soon as I do this I can spend your BTC.

If you give me one of these as payments for something, I have to run the transaction then and there to make sure the BTC hasn't already been spent. It is not a way to perform a BTC transaction offline. It is not a way to securely hold BTC.

I suppose you can take the private card and keep it out of sight (literally), but why put it on a wallet size card if you aren't going to carry it around?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: ALL of my bitcoins stolen (Around 60) . What the F*CK.
by
FuzzyCoins
on 27/06/2011, 06:26:29 UTC
Quote
And to those that say 'encrypting the wallet will make no difference' do you really think that the devs are thus adding it to pander to 'noobs', but that is secretly known as a waste of time?

Encrypting the wallet will help, but it doesn't solve the problem. When the BitCoin client is running, it will have decrypted your private keys and they will likely be in the memory of your machine. If you have a virus on your machine, that virus can access memory and get your private keys. Even if the devs of BitCoin work real hard and keep your keys encrypted when in memory, at some point they have be decrypted so they can be used. They may only be in memory or machine registers for a few milliseconds, but if you have a smart enough virus, your keys (and your BTC) will be compromised.

Encryption will help when the Bitcoin client is not running and it will protect you against an attack against your backups or other offline copies of your data.

It is essential for security (and the safekeeping of your BTC) that you keep your machine virus and malware free. If you can get to your money on your machine, so can a virus.

There is lots of good advice out there on how to keep your machine virus free, but the basics are to keep your machine patched, use antivirus, and never, ever, under any circumstances, access the Internet when you are logged in with administrative, root, or any other kind of elevated privileges.

In the Windows world turn on auto updates and let them run every day. Use a current, supported version of windows (that means Windows 7, not XP.) The anti-virus software the Microsoft gives out for free is solid - there is no excuse to not have anti-virus protection. Make sure your login account is not an "administrator". Only log in as an administrator when you want to install software.

In the Linux world, make sure you apply security packages from your distribution frequently. Don't run as root.

I don't post this to taunt or scold the OP, just to provide advice to prevent it happening to others.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: How to audit the mtgox and mybitoin?
by
FuzzyCoins
on 26/06/2011, 04:35:27 UTC
They would have to publish their wallet addresses (and then anyone can see how much is in the wallets), and then they could send small transaction amounts to a trusted party from each wallet to prove they had control of the wallets.
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: GUI mining - updated host address for slush's pool
by
FuzzyCoins
on 25/06/2011, 06:41:06 UTC
Feature Request: in addition to affinity, how about setting process priority? I like to have my miners running at low cpu priority, that way they can they can chug at their fastest speed with -f 1, but I can still use my computer. Currently I have to manually adjust process priority whenever I start a miner, it would be great if guiminer could just set it when it creates the process.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Can you say GOXED AND POWND AGAIN!~
by
FuzzyCoins
on 25/06/2011, 04:42:07 UTC
Status tool works for me using my newly reset password. It contains my login history, transaction history, and balances. All information is correct.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: MTGOX opening - GOXED
by
FuzzyCoins
on 25/06/2011, 04:40:57 UTC
I am now able to log into MtGox and see my current balances, login history,  and transaction history. (The claim status site, not the regular site.) My balances are correct. (They are low, but correct.)
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: I just got "account claim successful" from Mt Gox - anyone else?
by
FuzzyCoins
on 24/06/2011, 06:25:51 UTC
Was just notified that my account verification was accepted.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: MtGOX Launch . . . postponed
by
FuzzyCoins
on 24/06/2011, 03:56:49 UTC
So has anyone had their account "verified" by MtGox?

I would feel better if MtGox would just say that we have 60k accounts, only 15k of those accounts were active at the time of the crash, 5k of those accounts have started the verification process and we have actually verified 1,245 of the accounts. Verification is going much slower than we expected, we will bring the exchange back on line when we verify 2,000 accounts. We will post the updated stats of how many accounts are verified once a day.

If we had a message such as this, I would be content to wait a bit, but until I hear that someone, anyone, has been notified that their account has been verified, I will be suspicious that none ever will be and that the exchange will never open again.

This would of course suck, and since this is unregulated and there are no legal agreements between users of MtGox and MtGox, it will be too bad, so sad, but at least if it fails, we can move on. I would just like to know if it is going to fail or if there is any real reason for hope.

Edit: 6/24/2011 06:23 I have been notified that my account has been verified. Good news!
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: DOWNLOAD LINK FOR MTGOX COMPROMISED ACCOUNT CSV
by
FuzzyCoins
on 19/06/2011, 20:19:21 UTC
It's amazing how small the market is really, just 60k people. wtf.
Also interesting is how the number of traders is exploding. I started this about 2 weeks ago and I am at position 28k in the 60k list. Meaning that the number of traders has more then doubled in the last few weeks.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Mtgox: Really Fishy Stuff Going On
by
FuzzyCoins
on 19/06/2011, 18:30:17 UTC
Quote
Well I think it's pretty clear we need a $1000-$5000 daily limit... People losing life fortunes in 20 seconds isn't cool. Whoever did this will be lucky to get their money out of dwolla. If I were magical Tux I would probably shut down the transactions.
Why? This how markets work. Buyers and Sellers are matched together. Someone was willing to buy at lot of BTC at pennies and someone else was willing to sell. BTC (like any other commodity) really doesn't have an intrinsic value, it is valued at what people say it is valued at. Since BTC is a new commodity and there are not a lot of people trading in it, the market (all the buyers and sellers) haven't really figured out what it is worth.

This is currently the wild west. The opportunities for reward are great, the risks are extreme. Deal with it. Have fun!
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Portland bitcoin users?
by
FuzzyCoins
on 16/06/2011, 03:35:03 UTC
Here in Portland as well. If I am in town I would be happy to join a meet up.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: Reason for multiple worker accounts?
by
FuzzyCoins
on 14/06/2011, 02:48:27 UTC
Thanks guys.