I still feel like you are focusing on the wrong thing, but hey... it's your coin, you are the boss.
I can only state things from my point of view, I'm not anyone else.
For me, I'm 50/50 with CIRC. As I mine it, I sell half and stash half. If I can't recoup the cost of mining it, I'm going to move on to another coin that will. I That's where I'm at. I would imagine I'm not the only one. I really do not care what algorithm I'm mining, I just thought CIRC sounded interesting... but again, if I can't at least cover the cost of electricity, I'm going to find a different coin that will.
I wish you well with CIRC and I do think your algorithm is something to keep an eye on. I'm just not tied to it. If that makes you not trust me, then so be it. I don't think it's a bad thing for me to be able to cover the cost of the electricity for mining a coin.
It's not that I have a low level of intelligence, or don't care about scientific advancement or any of that. I just don't feel like it makes me a bad person to cover the electricity I use mining a coin. After all, I am using equipment that I bought, maintain and spend time tweaking... It's my hard earned cash, equipment and time I'm spending. It doesn't make me bad person to cover some of that cost. It certainly does NOT cover all the cost.
Again, I will mention how you said "So for a price of 14 sats/CIRC, core development of Circcash is not paid enough to do much of anything. If you want better services, then please pay more than 14 sats per CIRC."
You don't want to spend any money on your own coin. Why should I spend MY money on YOUR coin? You can say it's the right thing to do since it will advance science, the other coin algorithms do not. I say so what... I'm not going to spend my time and money on something if I can't at least partially cover the cost to mining it.