Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 29 results by GMD1987
I also have been having issues. I have a long running support ticket involving a missing money order and was going to communicate with the help desk but couldn't because login prompted me to enter 2FA. Has CampBX updated anyone on the situation? Do we have any recourse for this situation?
Does anyone know what is going on with CampBX? About 3 months ago I sent a money order to CampBX and 2 months ago support clarified that they did in fact receive it and would process it in a few weeks. Unfortunately the latest posting of Keyur @ Camp BX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=15102;sa=showPosts) are about 3 months old. It seems the exchange was dying off right around the time I was making those deposits; what happened? Also, is there any legal recourse for this? Can I take them to small claims court, report them to the BBB or GA district attorney or sue them/file in a joint lawsuit?
I received an Amazon GC instead of a cash payment that netted me a 10% bonus. I now have $880.00 of credit in my Amazon account. Willing to buy anything and ship anywhere on amazon.com for BTC at Bitstamp market price. You pay shipping and escrow costs if necessary. Low posts here but I have a localbitcoins.com account with lots of feedback. Please reply or PM for more details.
Re: [Work in progess] Burnins Avalon Chip to mining board service
I am looking for enough CANBUS and barrel jack adapters (or even a Supernova 1000 G2 PSU) to power 3 20 chip BitBurner modules. Are ordering these items through Burnin even possible any more? If not, I am accepting offers for the above items by PM, preferably with expedited shipping, as I expect my BitBurners to be shipped by the end of the week.
yes, but payment is only possible through bitpay or wire transfer.
As shipping you can select local pickup and reference the original order in the customer notes.
Re: [Work in progess] Burnins Avalon Chip to mining board service
I am looking for enough CANBUS and barrel jack adapters (or even a Supernova 1000 G2 PSU) to power 3 20 chip BitBurner modules. Are ordering these items through Burnin even possible any more? If not, I am accepting offers for the above items by PM, preferably with expedited shipping, as I expect my BitBurners to be shipped by the end of the week.
Re: SEC busts "pirateat40" aka Trendon Shavers...another one bites the dust
makes you look like an ass.
And the Pot Calling the Kettle Black Award goes to...If you no longer want to deal with BFLS/BFLS.RIG then buy out the shareholders, as per the original terms:
BFLS: $600/200 shares is $3.00 per share.
BFLS.RIG: $15295/6058 shares is $2.52 per share.
The really big problem is that the asic upgrade is not factored there. If Josh doesn't want to deal with this further, the best way would be to liquidate everything after the conversion to asics, by auctioning them. This would guarantee a correct book value for the shares, based on the current value of asic hardware.BFLS: $600/200 shares is $3.00 per share.
BFLS.RIG: $15295/6058 shares is $2.52 per share.
I have stated numerous times that I would prefer to continue as a shareholder here, but I respect the terms of the original contract which states that should the operator be unable or unwilling to continue, the assets would be liquidated and the proceeds disbursed. If that is what Josh decides to do, it is his decision to make.
I want to buy $500 Gift Card now. PM me.
rouf553 can you report back the validity of this trade? I am interested but would like to know what other's experience with this seller was.Looking for someone to gift me a 12 mos subscription to Last.FM for $40 (>5% profit) in BTC at Mt.Gox's last. User name is GMD1987, willing to use GPG/escrow/rate on bitcoin-otc. PM me for more details.
Welcome back! I didn't see it posted yet, but were account balances/history from pre-shutdown saved? Ie, could I get my account history from before the shutdown? Should I send an email to the same address that is used for receiving balances?
MatthewLM,
On Linux crunchbang 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2~bpo60+1 i686 GNU/Linux, cloned and ran ./configure && make test. Error on openssl libs, apt-get installed libssl-dev zlib1g-dev, tried again but got the following for dependencies/random/CBRand.c
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBNewSecureRandomGenerator:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:33: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBSecureRandomSeed:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:38: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBRandomSeed:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:41: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:42: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBSecureRandomInteger:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:45: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:45: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:47: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBFreeSecureRandomGenerator:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:51: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
Looking at the code, uint64_t was used (and designed for this sort of error, no?)
bool CBNewSecureRandomGenerator(uint64_t * gen){
*gen = (uint64_t)malloc(32);
return *gen;
}
Do you know what's going on here? I'm pretty sure the cast it's referring to is in the assignment. I think this was initially a warning converted to an error and just turning off pedantic would solve it but would be antithetical to a make test
On Linux crunchbang 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2~bpo60+1 i686 GNU/Linux, cloned and ran ./configure && make test. Error on openssl libs, apt-get installed libssl-dev zlib1g-dev, tried again but got the following for dependencies/random/CBRand.c
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBNewSecureRandomGenerator:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:33: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBSecureRandomSeed:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:38: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBRandomSeed:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:41: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:42: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBSecureRandomInteger:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:45: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:45: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:47: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
dependencies/random/CBRand.c: In function CBFreeSecureRandomGenerator:
dependencies/random/CBRand.c:51: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
Looking at the code, uint64_t was used (and designed for this sort of error, no?)
bool CBNewSecureRandomGenerator(uint64_t * gen){
*gen = (uint64_t)malloc(32);
return *gen;
}
Do you know what's going on here? I'm pretty sure the cast it's referring to is in the assignment. I think this was initially a warning converted to an error and just turning off pedantic would solve it but would be antithetical to a make test
Just got done with my tutoring session, verified and rated! nimda's instructions were precise and clear and he came off as very knowledgeable. Tipped 1 BTC for such a great service. Anyone looking to get into bitcoin-otc would be foolish to pass up such a great deal!