Search content
Sort by
Showing 5 of 5 results by GameofMeritsucking
Hosemary - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=995810
Abuse of accounts and trust -
Count 1:
Creates an alt of his:
June 01, 2025, GameofMeritSucking just for the sake of an attack as stated by
This user should be permanently or temporary banned before he can fix his mental health crisis.
Dunderheadedmotormouth! You better shut your whore mouth. I'm not his alt account. Stop creating nonsense and please stop mentioning me in senseless topics without valid evidence.Abuse of accounts and trust -
Count 1:
Creates an alt of his:
June 01, 2025, GameofMeritSucking just for the sake of an attack as stated by
This user should be permanently or temporary banned before he can fix his mental health crisis.
His profile says that he received a total of 47 merits from multiple members on the 7th of this month. This may be normal, but I don't think he got so many merits on worthy posts.
Two of his posts in particular surprised me a lot. He earned a total of 10+15=25 merits in two posts by asking some simple questions on the gambling discussion board.
Is because they are Nigerian prince so are treatment better? Normal user barely gets merit on some occasions. Probably it was last time on Christmas Two of his posts in particular surprised me a lot. He earned a total of 10+15=25 merits in two posts by asking some simple questions on the gambling discussion board.
I'm not against those user nor being jealous, no issue with them regarding they've received tons of merits for their posts even if they seem geneic| I'm just trying to understand whether the posts were made by them totally merit worthy or not.
I'm sharing here some of the those posts where users recieved a tons of merits in generic comments.
1)The op received 20 merits by one user in this quoted thread.
2) Another user received 15 merits in this quoted thread of op with that previous merit sender.
3) Same user received again 10 merits from previous sende.
Was it really a worthy post?
Thank You.
I'm sharing here some of the those posts where users recieved a tons of merits in generic comments.
1)The op received 20 merits by one user in this quoted thread.
We can argue sports betting is about knowledge a person has about sports but at the end of the day, a person who merely goes with favorite, will also get his picks often right. So is sports betting actually about knowledge? Edit: So many people are misunderstanding the word, 'favorite' here. What I meant here is oddmaker's favorite. Suppose, a competition is held between two teams 'A' and 'B' with odds 1.2 for former and 2.0 for latter, then former is favorite, and bettor can bet on this favorite without having iota of knowledge about sports itself and still likely win the bet. I understand the payout will be less, but here we are saying, getting the pick right without having knowledge about sports whatsoever. Hope I have made myself clear enough.
2) Another user received 15 merits in this quoted thread of op with that previous merit sender.
I don't really know if similar question or concerns has been raised before, we often say that we are gamblers but does it mean that anyone who gambles once or twice is a gambler? If no, how long could someone be classified as a gambler or what games that are to be classified as someone gambling.Drop your opinion.
3) Same user received again 10 merits from previous sende.
I would love to know your opinion over this question above as it's painful to see that what you do or what gives you joy at times people often term it as something bad or possibly as an irresponsible people. If it was you, what would you do knowing too well that people who gambles are often seen as useless people and irresponsible people due to what some fellas has presented themselves into while gambling without at least showing any sign of responsibleness. Also, What do you think can be done to see gamblers as a responsible people in our society?
Was it really a worthy post?
Thank You.
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Does this mean that MAGA people won't be buying Tesla's anymore?
⭐ Merited by hugeblack (1)