Search content
Sort by
Showing 11 of 11 results by Gazzi
Is it technically possible to divide all coins by 10? Max supply , current supply, block rewards etc.
Eg if you own 100000 coins it will become 10000. It will require the price to go up 10 times but I don't think 200sat will be a problem.
This will help with the price if it's too low for exchanges to list Gulden?
Let me know your thoughts and if it possible?
Eg if you own 100000 coins it will become 10000. It will require the price to go up 10 times but I don't think 200sat will be a problem.
This will help with the price if it's too low for exchanges to list Gulden?
Let me know your thoughts and if it possible?
Fuck, can't get funds to bitvavo until Monday. 
Don't panic, large sell order and bitcoin price could go down further before monday. I don't see many buyers in the market.
Was it not possible to create Florin on the Gulden blockchain? It looks like a really low IQ decision if it was possible. Both coins would benefit from each other, the way things are setup at the moment is both coins hurt one another.
Low supply coins require a lot of effort to maintain by the founder/s. These are the moves you need to make, most low supply projects have died out over time, I invested in one in 2016 and made a loss. My mistake because I kept buying until I owned 5% of the supply and wasn't able to sell them without crashing the price when I saw the writing on the wall. You can make a lot of money if you sell at the right time but don't be the one pumping the price like I did.
All entities require effort to become successful, generally speaking high supply coins will have a greater chance to receive more voluntary work.
I have no idea what the vision for this coin is, but from what I have read it appears to be going an isolationist route. This route generally requires a lot of funding as you're not inviting others to participate on your blockchain.
For businesses in the Netherlands looking to create their own tokens (business on the blockchain), Gulden would be an ideal candidate due to easier access to the team via language (Dutch) and location.
Gulden is A tier level 1 blockchain which counted for a lot until 2018.
After the next project I would personally switch focus to making Gulden an interoperable blockchain through the use of smart contracts and allowing tokenized blockchains to be added. Gulden claims to have top notch security so why not move to the next level by
providing businesses the opportunity to work off the Gulden blockchain?
Reading some of the history on this coin, it's strength is not market reach, raising capital or usability but core development based on solid security. Let others make Gulden usable while they benefit from the security this blockchain provides.
I would also consider if possible to change florin into a token on the Gulden blockchain with a separate use case, let the current holders do a coin swap on the only exchange. This merger will create value for both coins, 2 different blockchains don't provide any value to each other for
the investor and adds more confusion. it can also serve to show others that Gulden is open for business. USE US TO CREATE YOUR NEXT BUSINESS VENTURE
The benefit is, as more tokens are created against your blockchain, is that exchanges will be forced to add Gulden for free due to it being the base chain for those tokens. Funding from various businesses with specific development requests, free marketing. etc etc
Review the above with a pinch of salt, if the goal of Gulden is to remain a basic cryptocurrency that is a better version of bitcoin (1000s of these already) than the team should carry on doing what they doing as they are doing this part well.
Have decided to start investing in Gulden, lets see how it goes.
Wish people like you were around when EFL needed investment.
Trust me m8, I am small fish in a big pond, I can't afford to be a whale in a top 300 coin and a goal of mine was to be a 1% in a coin that has promise. I aim to have 7 million to make it 1% of max supply.
Buying 1% of the total supply of this coin was too cheap, another 1% worth it long term?
Welcome to the Gulden club! You can't go wrong investing in Gulden. I would suggest placing lower bids and let the weak hands dump for more Gulden and let the rest of the Gulden community make some Gulden profit from the dumpers.
This is by far the most riskiest purchase of all the coins I have. I won't be buying more as 1% of the total supply is already in dangerous territory as I won't be doing any work for the coin, I am only 1 investor.
Please let me know if there is any campaigns running that I can contribute too to help this coin get some attention.
pre Novo?
Novo was a new coin created by Rijk to raise more funds for development. In hindsight if they tried lowering the max supply and rewards for Gulden first, it's all that would of been needed to keep development funded. The problem for the main developer Malcolm, is he has to support 2 blockchains and not 1, which will slow development for Gulden.
Novo had it's name changed to florin and the one positive is that the supply is so little that it doesn't affect Gulden in a financial way because there is not much to buy. It's more of a time sink.
Is it not technically possible to add tokens/coins to the Gulden blockchain? This imo would create more value for both ?
What are the plans for this coin? I am looking at a few low value coins to take a risk on and Gulden was suggested by a friend as a coin that has not lived up to it's potential in terms of price.
The below link has good detail of what Gulden has done, it's a real shame the author never kept the first post up to date. Like the poster above has mentioned the Gulden specifications has changed for the better.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5276086
I get most of my information on telegram but the main community is on slack.
This forum frustrating does not have a thumbs up. Will have a look, thanks.
What are the plans for this coin? I am looking at a few low value coins to take a risk on and Gulden was suggested by a friend as a coin that has not lived up to it's potential in terms of price.