Sources tell me only Rijk gets the moolah, the rest work for decentralisation.

Community is strong these days. Lots of work is done to promote Gulden and first time focus on new exchange listings.

Max supply dropped from 1.68 billion to 750 million and reward drop coming in August but if it does not come in August the faster we get to 750 million supply and the faster the reward halvings will have to come. It's a win win.

In 6 years people will wish they purchased Gulden in 2021.

Must say the sentiment on Gulden Slack is so much better with you gone.
So the issue must have been you as a toxic person.
You could always send some funds to the Kickstarter we made for Bitvavo:

GJRPTU32pLgVVSLKCNzEraUvSGGipzW5PW

Maybe that’s your ticket back in to slack. Otherwise it could be that you are doomed to this toxic semi-inactive platform. With your profit filled bag it has to be a generous donation, though your toxic opinions do fit perfectly in here.

Best regards,

The reward is meant to drop in August to 120 and 60 in 2024 or 2025.
The developers have to approve the change as it was requested by the community but Rijk looks confident it will be ready for August.
The max supply for Gulden is now 750 million, was changed from 1.68 billion two weeks ago.

Agreed.

Maybe some wait untill the decision is final but inpersonally thing this is the time to stock up on realtively cheap Gulden to fill some witness accounts

Nice price action this morning

I noticed a dump on the market after my post. Traders are selling my BS.

Interesting discussions after I was here last time. Some Bitcointalk slang too, of course, but that's part of the game.

I just wanted to clarify what exactly the plan is regarding the supply and reward adjustment.

As you can see on Github, the supply adjustment is already in the code, so only the rewards / halving needs to be added. We are following the advisory board and our intention is to adopt this adjustment as well. However, we need to find out what the possible consequences of this drastic change are. That has nothing to do with our opinion. Our job is to do what the majority of users (community) want.

What we need to find out is, above all, the Witness/Mining ratio. In the design of Witness, no account was taken of a situation where Witness gets more than Miner. Economically that may be very good, but in terms of security and stability it should be too. We are going to look into that and if it turns out that there are significant risks then we will feed that back to the Advisory Board. If there are no significant risks, we will, of course, implement the change. This has nothing to do with the dev reward, which can be adjusted.

At the moment we are in the middle of the Witness Sync development, which will mean a huge improvement in terms of synchronisation. We hope to be able to test it this month and start working on the reward topic immediately after Witness Sync.

This research will not take months and the implementation in the code is not very complex. The change is planned for August.

At Novo, such changes have already been made and will come into effect around the summer. The reason why the change was made so easily there is mainly because Novo is still very small. So if something still needs to be changed, it can be done easily. We often test something with Novo first, and then apply it to Gulden. That is the advantage of being able to efficiently maintain two projects.

Technical analysis youtube blog Doopie just calculated that if 114 sat is reached, price will propell to over 209 sat

What potential future price does Gulden have? My 2 witness accounts are earning good for every time I find a block.

Yeah hardfork is planned in august i read on Blockfolio