The terms of the 2016 Coinomat::WAVES asset swap were very public, and have all the requirements for a legally binding contract - parties, consent, object consideration - in my own case I purchased directly from Mr Ivanov OTC via forum messages on nxtforum.org. All the evidence suggests there was a new implied contract for a debt once the WAVES DEX went live and the swap date was past due.

If you agree to swap for WCT now there is no actual theft of your WAVES debt anymore (just a shit load of lost value), coz you agreed to the new terms and settled, so there's no debt @ 2017 bull prices you can write-off now, nothing to report to the police except your bad trades with Mr Ivanov that you consented to.

If your crypto activities have been declared for taxation (as mine have been since 2013) then Ivanov has broken a legally enforceable contract with you, and you have legal ways to claw back some wealth, so DO NOT swap for 0.03 cents now.

If your crypto activities are off the grid then your only option is to seek compensation off the grid.

If you doubt this look into the history of Liberty Reserve, the same thing will happen to Mr Ivanov
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Reserve


The most likely scenario is Sasha Ivanov will be prosecuted by the SEC later this year for illegal securities fraud and be sent to prison, Coinomat will feature in the prosecution as everything is documented and police reports will now be mounting up. The crackdown is coming and Sasha Ivanov is an easy target.

If you missed it this past week: we have started development efforts on integrating chain security from Komodo’s DPoW, which will allow for securing BLUR with BTC through notarized transactions.

You can read about the beginnings of this collaboration here: https://komodoplatform.com/tt2019-16-synthetic-positions-prices-blockchain-financial-instruments

When voters look at an unknown candidate they might ask, "How serious is this guy, how committed is he?"

How much revenue he's willing to lose in his first year to get an opportunity is one measure of a guys commitment to running a NN, and I think last year proved that this measure had some validity, guys who offered some revenue got elected and overall did pretty well!

I value the contributions of the candidates to the komodo ecosystem x1000 more than the KMD they paid me last year! The candidates I supported last year wont need me this election, so I have one more opportunity to help some new guys get a go this year.

Ok, give a definition of dPoW without mentioning how the notaries are selected then, is that how you propose to rid people of confusion?

You must be a troll, anyone doing DD who doesn't appreciate 64 NN are elected based on 1KMD = 1 VOTE would call komodo a scam shitcoin,

"proof of jl777's buddies in discord"

The only way you'll be able to obtain a 'minting account', and therefore a portion of the block reward once qortal project chain begins, is to:


1. prove you have supported the previous chain, by verification that you have run a node, and staked during the last few months when not many people were, due to the fact that there was no staking reward. This alone will prove that you supported the project, wanting to see it survive, regardless of the fact that you were not receiving monetary reward for doing so, and is sufficient to obtain a minting account on qortal project chain.

So, did anyone tried to contact him, and got actual response, or is this another of those "this year, or next" promises?