Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 145 results by GunPowder
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
I get 0 HW errors
sgminer5.10-dev nicehash build november7,2014
298Kh/s
1040/1500
R9 290X
14.6RC2 (june23) CCC
worksize: 64
gpu-threads: 2
intensity: 15
What's the difference you're getting from 14 to 15 intensity? I've got a very little speed upsgminer5.10-dev nicehash build november7,2014
298Kh/s
1040/1500
R9 290X
14.6RC2 (june23) CCC
worksize: 64
gpu-threads: 2
intensity: 15
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
So the new neoscrypt kernel "isn't released yet", but the hashrate on most of the neoscrypt coins has doubled in the last few hours..
Is that's how it's gonna be? Know someone to get the new kernel?
Is that's how it's gonna be? Know someone to get the new kernel?
Nope. It's here: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/neoscrypt.cl
Worksize should be 64, don't bother setting TC, GPU threads 2. Basically the same as my earlier screenshot.
256 @ 7970
240 @ 280x
-Your OS ?
-Your SGminer version ?
-Your AMD driver version ?
I could mine as higher speed but more HW also
PiMP 1.4
CGMiner 5.0.0
14.6
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
So the new neoscrypt kernel "isn't released yet", but the hashrate on most of the neoscrypt coins has doubled in the last few hours..
Is that's how it's gonna be? Know someone to get the new kernel?
Some people got this at least sunday. I received on sunday the offer to buy new kernel.cl from the member of this forum. I wont discover his name, its just to clean situation about hash growing. Its not because profit.Is that's how it's gonna be? Know someone to get the new kernel?
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
So the new neoscrypt kernel "isn't released yet", but the hashrate on most of the neoscrypt coins has doubled in the last few hours..
Is that's how it's gonna be? Know someone to get the new kernel?
Is that's how it's gonna be? Know someone to get the new kernel?
Nope. It's here: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/neoscrypt.cl
Worksize should be 64, don't bother setting TC, GPU threads 2. Basically the same as my earlier screenshot.
256 @ 7970
240 @ 280x
Guys,
Could anybody share .bin file for 7970 made on 13.12 drivers please?
I'm running Linux and drivers changing is not a tipo))
Thanx in advance
Could anybody share .bin file for 7970 made on 13.12 drivers please?
I'm running Linux and drivers changing is not a tipo))
Thanx in advance
is your bin named like(i have 280x)??
neoscrypt140909Tahitigmgc16384w48l4.bin
Re: [PiMP: Portable Instant Mining Platform] 64bit, PoolMgr, Scrypt/N/Vert/Dark/Max/
Sorry, 1.5.6 is bu***hit release:
This happens with included sgminer5 as well as with latest version from git.
1.4.2 is the best for now..
Code:
http://______ |__| _____ ______ Portable Instant Mining Platform
\____ \| |/ \____ \ Pimp Version 1.5.6
| |_> > | Y Y \ |_> > ATI Catalyst: 14.6
| __/|__|__|_| / __/ Support: #PiMP on FreenodeIRC
|__| \/|__| http://getPiMP.org
Type pimp for a list of pimp console shortcuts and commands
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-4300 Quad-Core Processor
Cores: 4 @ 3817 Mhz Memory: 4 GB
Miner not started - Stats Unavailable.
Last login: Fri Jul 25 16:00:42 2014 from 192.168.1.2
[ GPU Status: Miner not running]
[04:15 PM][Uptime: 6 min][root@darkminer2(192.168.1.102)]
[/root]:# /opt/sgminer5/sgminer -c /opt/ifmi/sgminer.x11.conf -T
[16:15:53] Started sgminer 4.2.2-283-g3ddff
[16:15:53] * using Jansson 2.6
[16:15:53] Loaded configuration file /opt/ifmi/sgminer.x11.conf
[16:15:54] Probing for an alive pool
[16:15:55] Switching to NH x11 - first alive pool
[16:15:55] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool NH x11.
[16:15:55] Startup Pool No = 4
[16:15:55] Building binary darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4.bin
[16:15:56] CK x11 alive, testing stability
[16:15:56] Switching MRR x11-2 to stratum+tcp://us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:50032
[16:15:56] Switching MRR x11-1 to stratum+tcp://eu-01.miningrigrentals.com:50033
[16:15:57] TMB x11 alive, testing stability
[16:15:57] MRR x11-2 alive, testing stability
[16:15:57] MRR x11-1 alive, testing stability
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:17] API running in IP access mode on port 4028 (4)
[16:16:31] Accepted Coin 1993 Diff 0.352/0.100 GPU 3 at MRR x11-1
Segmentation fault13.88Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.199/m
[ GPU Status: Miner not running]
[04:16 PM][Uptime: 7 min][root@darkminer2(192.168.1.102)]
[/root]:#
\____ \| |/ \____ \ Pimp Version 1.5.6
| |_> > | Y Y \ |_> > ATI Catalyst: 14.6
| __/|__|__|_| / __/ Support: #PiMP on FreenodeIRC
|__| \/|__| http://getPiMP.org
Type pimp for a list of pimp console shortcuts and commands
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-4300 Quad-Core Processor
Cores: 4 @ 3817 Mhz Memory: 4 GB
Miner not started - Stats Unavailable.
Last login: Fri Jul 25 16:00:42 2014 from 192.168.1.2
[ GPU Status: Miner not running]
[04:15 PM][Uptime: 6 min][root@darkminer2(192.168.1.102)]
[/root]:# /opt/sgminer5/sgminer -c /opt/ifmi/sgminer.x11.conf -T
[16:15:53] Started sgminer 4.2.2-283-g3ddff
[16:15:53] * using Jansson 2.6
[16:15:53] Loaded configuration file /opt/ifmi/sgminer.x11.conf
[16:15:54] Probing for an alive pool
[16:15:55] Switching to NH x11 - first alive pool
[16:15:55] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool NH x11.
[16:15:55] Startup Pool No = 4
[16:15:55] Building binary darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4.bin
[16:15:56] CK x11 alive, testing stability
[16:15:56] Switching MRR x11-2 to stratum+tcp://us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:50032
[16:15:56] Switching MRR x11-1 to stratum+tcp://eu-01.miningrigrentals.com:50033
[16:15:57] TMB x11 alive, testing stability
[16:15:57] MRR x11-2 alive, testing stability
[16:15:57] MRR x11-1 alive, testing stability
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:11] Initialising kernel darkcoin-mod.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:16:17] API running in IP access mode on port 4028 (4)
[16:16:31] Accepted Coin 1993 Diff 0.352/0.100 GPU 3 at MRR x11-1
Segmentation fault13.88Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.199/m
[ GPU Status: Miner not running]
[04:16 PM][Uptime: 7 min][root@darkminer2(192.168.1.102)]
[/root]:#
This happens with included sgminer5 as well as with latest version from git.
1.4.2 is the best for now..
Re: [ANN] NiceHash.com - innovative professional cryptocurrency cloud mining service
Hello NiceHash
Could you please advise, why more than one multialgoport are open in the same moment. It happens again and again. When NiceHash is switching algo to new port, old port still be opened
Thank you
Could you please advise, why more than one multialgoport are open in the same moment. It happens again and again. When NiceHash is switching algo to new port, old port still be opened
Thank you
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
That can depend on checking interval. What kind of miner do you use?
latest sgminer-5_0 from git. Should I use NH-version?They're both the same.
By the way, TMB is ok with that, if one port is open - others are closed. I don't know how, but it is.
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
That can depend on checking interval. What kind of miner do you use?
latest sgminer-5_0 from git. Should I use NH-version?Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
30 seconds is configurable, you need to just change
To another value. If you want 10 minutes, use 600.
seems to me, it will make switching even slowlyCode:
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
To another value. If you want 10 minutes, use 600.
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
That can depend on checking interval. What kind of miner do you use?
latest sgminer-5_0 from git. Should I use NH-version?Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
Also consider fact, that our system performs check on existing miners every 10 minutes. The stats on page may change and you still work on old algo. This is to prevent too often switches, which reduce miners performance.
We are still waiting from sgminer devs to increase pool check interval for multialgo configs from 30 seconds up to 10 minutes, because now, your miner will switch in 30 seconds if top priority algorithm appears alive instead after several minutes as it was meant to be.
The point is more than one multialgo ports are open in the same moment. Is it ok?We are still waiting from sgminer devs to increase pool check interval for multialgo configs from 30 seconds up to 10 minutes, because now, your miner will switch in 30 seconds if top priority algorithm appears alive instead after several minutes as it was meant to be.
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
Well, here is another example
NH site now is showing this:
Due to my factors f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455 my profit is:
X11 0.3781 * 0.145 = 0,0548245
X13 0.4412 * 0.117 = 0,0516204
X15 0.5472 * 0.101 = 0,0552672
Nist5 0.1345 * 0.455 = 0,0611975
So, Nist5 is the most profitable by NH stats and also by my factors. Good.
Ok, but what we see on the rigs? Here is the screen from one of the rigs, identical hw, identical confs:
Three ports are open!
Devs, it's a bug, isn't it?
P.S.
Part of config (I even deleted non-multialgo ports):
NH site now is showing this:
Due to my factors f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455 my profit is:
X11 0.3781 * 0.145 = 0,0548245
X13 0.4412 * 0.117 = 0,0516204
X15 0.5472 * 0.101 = 0,0552672
Nist5 0.1345 * 0.455 = 0,0611975
So, Nist5 is the most profitable by NH stats and also by my factors. Good.
Ok, but what we see on the rigs? Here is the screen from one of the rigs, identical hw, identical confs:
Three ports are open!
Devs, it's a bug, isn't it?
P.S.
Part of config (I even deleted non-multialgo ports):
Code:
"pools": [
{
"name": "NH x11 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name": "NH x13 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x13"
},
{
"name": "NH x15 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x15"
},
{
"name": "NH Nist5 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4340",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "nist5"
}
]
{
"name": "NH x11 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name": "NH x13 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x13"
},
{
"name": "NH x15 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x15"
},
{
"name": "NH Nist5 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4340",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "nist5"
}
]
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
I get 5mh/s on x11 and 150mh/s on nist5 per card on average although I can get more like 190mh/s if I can keep my cards cool enough
150mh@nist5 per card? Unbelievable 
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
Make sure you use same factors and costs for all connections made. If these are not the same, then this is exactly what you can see - multiple stratums being alive and ready to serve work.
Please advise, where I'm wrong. f=Numbers are my Mhs:Code:
"pools": [
{
"name": "NH x11 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name": "NH x13 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x13"
},
{
"name": "NH x15 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x15"
},
{
"name": "NH Nist5 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4340",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "nist5"
},
{
"name": "NH x11",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3336",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "x",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name": "NH x13",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3337",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "x",
"profile": "x13"
},
{
"name": "NH x15",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3339",
"user" : "***",
"pass" : "x",
"profile": "x15"
},
{
"name": "NH Nist5",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3340",
"user" : "***",
"pass" : "x",
"profile": "nist5"
}
]
{
"name": "NH x11 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name": "NH x13 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x13"
},
{
"name": "NH x15 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "x15"
},
{
"name": "NH Nist5 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4340",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "f0=0;f2=0;f3=145;f4=117;f5=0;f6=101;f7=455",
"profile": "nist5"
},
{
"name": "NH x11",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3336",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "x",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name": "NH x13",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3337",
"user" : "***",
"pass": "x",
"profile": "x13"
},
{
"name": "NH x15",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3339",
"user" : "***",
"pass" : "x",
"profile": "x15"
},
{
"name": "NH Nist5",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3340",
"user" : "***",
"pass" : "x",
"profile": "nist5"
}
]
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
MultiAlgo ports are not sharp.
In the same moment a few multialgo ports were open (4337, 4339 on the picture).
But the table on the site was saying 4339 much more profitable (In the moment when I made screen).
How can I solve that?
Thank you!
In the same moment a few multialgo ports were open (4337, 4339 on the picture).
But the table on the site was saying 4339 much more profitable (In the moment when I made screen).
How can I solve that?
Thank you!