Search content
Sort by
Showing 13 of 13 results by Haemophilus
Re: [ANN][ICO] Ethbet: Peer-to-Peer Ethereum-Based Dicing With No House Edge
If the reputation or name of the devs is not on the line, what guarantee do I have that your're not going to run away with all my eth? please don't take this as an offence, just trying to be careful, all these hacks in the past months have me on edge.
Re: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - Cryptopia
Hi all,
So I just wanted to come on and give my perspective on SIGT from a non miner point of view.
This is my first post here but ive been lurking a long time I'm just normally not very vocal on these types on forums
SIGT really is a very special opportunity. This is a coin the is community run and backed, we have gotten so much interest so fast because this is what the community has been waiting for to spark back up the old days when crypto was young and so much fun for a lot of us. The devs are not ppl getting paid tens of millions of dollars from ICOS that isn't even needed to run these projects. No the devs are also community members and ppl that are just as much invested into crypto as all of you... Ive been with SIGT since the get go and some of the ideas ive seen so far are just revolutionary! Instead of a vague answer and getting blown off when we voice our opinions we are being engaged and made part of the growth! Now I get it everyone is always careful in crypto and we never believe anything we hear from the teams we invest in 100%, I'm right there with you even coins I really believe in I doubt from time to time but with SIGT we are the team and most ppl don't doubt themselves Honestly I don't recommend anyone ever invest in anything just on someone elses words, no what I'm saying is instead of following the whales and the mobs or the giant ICO millionaires come on over to SIGT and voice your ideas and opinions and hang out with the community of like minded individuals and make your own decisions. There will always be haters but 98% of the time the haters are the ppl that are just mad that they couldn't get in early enough to play with the prices and try and take our money.. The SIGT community has shown our stance and we our here to stay I know you wont find me dogging on any other coin even if I don't like it because my opinion shouldn't effect other ppl.
Thank you for even reading if you did and I wish you all the best on your crypto journey! Have fun and enjoy this amazing digital world
So I just wanted to come on and give my perspective on SIGT from a non miner point of view.
This is my first post here but ive been lurking a long time I'm just normally not very vocal on these types on forums
SIGT really is a very special opportunity. This is a coin the is community run and backed, we have gotten so much interest so fast because this is what the community has been waiting for to spark back up the old days when crypto was young and so much fun for a lot of us. The devs are not ppl getting paid tens of millions of dollars from ICOS that isn't even needed to run these projects. No the devs are also community members and ppl that are just as much invested into crypto as all of you... Ive been with SIGT since the get go and some of the ideas ive seen so far are just revolutionary! Instead of a vague answer and getting blown off when we voice our opinions we are being engaged and made part of the growth! Now I get it everyone is always careful in crypto and we never believe anything we hear from the teams we invest in 100%, I'm right there with you even coins I really believe in I doubt from time to time but with SIGT we are the team and most ppl don't doubt themselves
Honestly I don't recommend anyone ever invest in anything just on someone elses words, no what I'm saying is instead of following the whales and the mobs or the giant ICO millionaires come on over to SIGT and voice your ideas and opinions and hang out with the community of like minded individuals and make your own decisions. There will always be haters but 98% of the time the haters are the ppl that are just mad that they couldn't get in early enough to play with the prices and try and take our money.. The SIGT community has shown our stance and we our here to stay I know you wont find me dogging on any other coin even if I don't like it because my opinion shouldn't effect other ppl.Thank you for even reading if you did and I wish you all the best on your crypto journey! Have fun and enjoy this amazing digital world
Thank you for your insight, completely agree. You know what a fair distribution gives? a huge community, involved and dedicated. No whales holding 30%+ of the supply, no bulshit. Just a fair coin and a motivated community.
Re: [1800+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
Interested, but after watching the Youtube clip of the guy on Coin Interview... I am quite concerned about this. Doesn't appear knowledgable, but worse than that, he seems quite shifty. Can't answer basic questions about his service which is now, I suppose technically, valuated at about $2Mil. Something's wrong here.
EDIT: Seriously - check out this interview and then tell me that you're comfortable sending any money or crypto to this guy. He's a co-founder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cSK1d-7Irc
EDIT 2: I am getting a bad vibe from these guys, all around. Good luck investors. I am out.
EDIT 3: In that interview, I noticed that Dimitri Chupryna really struggled answering any technical questions. I'll point out that his title, according to the Whitepaper, and the fund's website is as follows: Co-founder, Technology & Analytics.
EDIT: Seriously - check out this interview and then tell me that you're comfortable sending any money or crypto to this guy. He's a co-founder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cSK1d-7Irc
EDIT 2: I am getting a bad vibe from these guys, all around. Good luck investors. I am out.
EDIT 3: In that interview, I noticed that Dimitri Chupryna really struggled answering any technical questions. I'll point out that his title, according to the Whitepaper, and the fund's website is as follows: Co-founder, Technology & Analytics.
It doesn't seem like Evan is convinced at all in that interview, he seems extremely skeptical. Not to mention he has to correct Dimitri multiple times during the interview, correct him on things you would hope he is an expert on considering his position in TaaS and the supposed expertise you would hope would go along with such a position. Evan appears to know more than he does... Dimitri didn't even know what a fiduciary was and people are okay with trusting him with millions? Lol.
Also a lot of "maybe's", "I think so's", "should be's", "in the future's", etc coming from Dimitri.
And yeah, his body language is shifty as fuck.
Yeah, this just reeks. I hope nobody gets screwed out of their hard-earned funds. I've been involved in enough Security-scams to be have a pretty good spidey-sense and it is definitely going off here.
I don't really think you can nail him with that performance, some people are very nervous on camera especially if you are doing it for the first time
And I really wish somebody would respond to my post about what seem to be inconsistencies in their proclaimed experience on their website and what they actually have done according to their work history on their linkedins. I just feel like these guys are trying to sell themselves a little more than they can reasonably attest to, which I guess makes sense considering they are trying to raise 101 million USD which would be the largest ICO in history.
Call me crazy but if you want to hold the largest ICO in history I feel like there should be some pretty damn good/distinguished/recognized experts leading the project or something that can justify that level of trust and confidence from investors.
Hi dear.
it is really nice to see that you've researched about TaaS very deeply and pointed out those points and weakness above.. I am really not able to answer them because I don't belong to technical department. but I've sent your questions to all founders and asked them to must answer them because these questions are really important and must be answered. I hope someone from core team will come online and give you a detailed answer. and you can join telegram and talk to them live and ask any question you have in mind.
thank you so much for your time.
Okay so TaaS has been pretty active in here since this but still no response, kind of discouraging tbh.
Agree, this should have been adressed already...jamalaezaz??
Re: [2000+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
Hello, therefore Taas token is something like a mutual fund service? where peole invest in the tokens, taas use the funds to trade and we are publicly accessible to the trade ledger and 50% profit will be payback to investor?
Thanks
Thanks
That's right, it is a closed-end fund that will accept investors only during the ICO, distributing tokens as a proof of membership of the fund, this tokens will be tradeable in different exchanges after the ICO ends. 50% of the profits made quarterly will be distributed between the token holders (Proportionally to the number of tokens in possesion), 25% of the profits will be reinvestend in the portfolio and the remaining 25% will be stored in a fund. You can read the whitepaper here:
http://taas.fund/media/whitepaper.pdf
Re: [2000+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
So I saw there is cap at 101 million, but is there a minimum for ico to succeed? If, for example, ico collects 10mil, there will be only 10 million coins and the rest 90 million will be burned? maybe there is white paper to read with all that stuff available? It would be nice if you have one in russian
Thats right, there are 101.000.000 tokens available during the ICO. All the tokens not acquired during this period will be burned. No new tokens will ever be made so the supply will be limited, this usually represents a premium on the price.
Whitepaper in russian:
http://taas.fund/media/whitepaper_rus.pdf
Re: [1800+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
why are americans specifically excluded from the ICO?
I asked that to Dimitri Chupryna in the telegram group and this is his answer verbatim:
"We are incorporated in Singapore and follow the regulations and laws of Singapore. ICO activity might fall under other regulations in USA as well as many cryptocurrency activities are not defined.
so combination of facts excludes current possibility for USA citizens to participate in Initial coin offering to avoid possible legal incongruities. It is TaaS management decision that is based on our Legal team recommendations."
Re: [1800+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
We will see about that after first payout this year.
I'm sure their first payout will be good and enticing - I am more concerned about the long-term viability of this fund.
Take into account remaining tokens will be burned, so there might be as little as 4-8 000 000 TaaS making tem very scarce. Even if they earn nothing, they will trade extremely well.
Perhaps. I'm not saying that early investors won't take a profit. I'm just saying that I am highly skeptical of their entire scheme. Starting with Dimitri. His shiftiness in interviews, ignorance, and refusal to talk specifics, concerns me greatly.
Don't be that guy we need to give them some credit, so far we have a webpage that accepts payments and it works, displays some shit, gives you tokens and so on.
This alone means they can do at least one thing correctly.
That... is a terrible way to measure the legitimacy and viability of a prospective startup.
Terrible.
And the little background you know about this guys is enough to discredit the project? Vitalik Buterin dropped university and wrote articles for 3 usd each before the creation of ethereum, I'm not saying that you are wrong and I dont want to be disrepectful, but we should wait before making assumptions.
The wait, and let's see methodology is fair, but I don't think that logic applies when it is applied to a startup valuated at over $2 million dollars. I don't wait and see if my $10,000 investment is a scam or not. I do research.
If I thought this project was legitimate, I would absolutely be all over it and a happy investor. Do your own research if you feel that I am not being fair and reasonable. I will happily retract any and all of my statements if someone can correct me.
I agree, you should not invest if you are not comfortable doing it, and I understand that you are being vocal about the things that worry you because you expect and explanation from the developers and want to help people, you are doing what any reasonable investor and good human being would do and I thank you for that. I find the team and advisors trustworthy and I think that the project will get me some profits, so I decided to invest.
Re: [1800+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
We will see about that after first payout this year.
I'm sure their first payout will be good and enticing - I am more concerned about the long-term viability of this fund.
Take into account remaining tokens will be burned, so there might be as little as 4-8 000 000 TaaS making tem very scarce. Even if they earn nothing, they will trade extremely well.
Perhaps. I'm not saying that early investors won't take a profit. I'm just saying that I am highly skeptical of their entire scheme. Starting with Dimitri. His shiftiness in interviews, ignorance, and refusal to talk specifics, concerns me greatly.
Don't be that guy we need to give them some credit, so far we have a webpage that accepts payments and it works, displays some shit, gives you tokens and so on.
This alone means they can do at least one thing correctly.
That... is a terrible way to measure the legitimacy and viability of a prospective startup.
Terrible.
And the little background you know about this guys is enough to discredit the project? Vitalik Buterin dropped university and wrote articles for 3 usd each before the creation of ethereum, I'm not saying that you are wrong and I dont want to be disrepectful, but we should wait before making assumptions.
Re: [1800+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
TaaS project is awesome, is the first closed-end fund in crypto land, we may be the most profitable fund here. Surpass Iconomi and melonport.
Hi . thanks for the interest. yes we are also hopping a big sucess. we are almost at 2000 BTC investment.The roadmap shows that the Q1 payout will be made in july 2017... is this correct?
The first payout will be 3 months after we begin operations, so approximate date is late July - August.
So operations will begin immediately after the ICO finalices?
Re: [1800+ BTC RAISED] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End fund [JOIN ICO]
TaaS project is awesome, is the first closed-end fund in crypto land, we may be the most profitable fund here. Surpass Iconomi and melonport.
Hi . thanks for the interest. yes we are also hopping a big sucess. we are almost at 2000 BTC investment.The roadmap shows that the Q1 payout will be made in july 2017... is this correct?
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
Lots of investors are accumulating some LISK before they announce the SDK.
The following hype could drive LISK to new heights.
The following hype could drive LISK to new heights.
When is SDK planned to be ready?
Between October-December 2017