Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 499 results by HardwarePal
Re: [ANN] [BCAP] THE FIRST DIGITAL LIQUID VENTURE FUND - BLOCKCHAIN CAPITAL FUND
WHY! Is it because the TokenHub only had one purpose, namely for BCAP's ICO? That's my guess. What's yours?
My guess is they had an agreement so that they gain traction to run future ICOs.
Re: [ANN] [BCAP] THE FIRST DIGITAL LIQUID VENTURE FUND - BLOCKCHAIN CAPITAL FUND
A lot ppl here seem to smoke crack....
Yes, it's us crack smokers protecting Newbie assholes like yourself.
You're such a retard for investing in an entity specifically designed to fund their pet projects, thus double-dipping into your kind investment while you sit back and hope for a scant ROI. You have no fuckin idea what you invested in or why a third-party thingy made up of Russians acted as the intermediary for this ICO, then immediately after the ICO ended, the following were expunged from the website:
31: https://tokenhub.com/ico/31 ~ Humaniq ~ April 6 - April 27
32: https://tokenhub.com/ico/32 ~ Melonport ~ February 15 - March 16
33: https://tokenhub.com/ico/33 ~ WeTrust ~ March 2 - April 14
34: https://tokenhub.com/ico/34 ~ TaaS ~ March 27 - April 27
35: https://tokenhub.com/ico/35 ~ Embermine ~ April 13 - May 13
I now suggest you go and get a blowjob from a snappy turtle since you love pain so much.
Interesting finds Gleb but I think you don't understand what Tokenhub is.
Maybe look at Aragon.one / Cofound / Tokenmarket to get a better idea.
Re: [ANN] [BCAP] THE FIRST DIGITAL LIQUID VENTURE FUND - BLOCKCHAIN CAPITAL FUND
Was interested but now the memorandum states :
10 million tokens + 40 million tokens (total 50 million) with prior notice from Tokenhub.
This shouldn't be a fixed price offering at $1
10 million tokens + 40 million tokens (total 50 million) with prior notice from Tokenhub.
This shouldn't be a fixed price offering at $1
Re: [ANN] [ICO] TaaS: Token-as-a-Service | Closed-End Fund | ICO 27th March 2017
How do you prevent people pump and dump on your actions, making you pay more at the end?
I mean transparency is a good point, but isn´t it a bit contraproductive in that case or will you always market-buy all at once?^^
I mean transparency is a good point, but isn´t it a bit contraproductive in that case or will you always market-buy all at once?^^
Had this same thought today. By having a view only API key from exchanges (without a time delay) you are basically showing all your trades so you can't average in (and basically get punished from other faster/more knowledgeable traders or bots).
This shows how little thought was put into it and their whole service which is based on trading/investing of what seems like it's coming from a bunch of amateurs.
To Be Or Not To Be? That Is The Big Bitcoin Question
By Tim Zagar, Co-founder of ICONOMI
http://www.nasdaq.com/article/to-be-or-not-to-be-that-is-the-big-bitcoin-question-cm758714
By Tim Zagar, Co-founder of ICONOMI
http://www.nasdaq.com/article/to-be-or-not-to-be-that-is-the-big-bitcoin-question-cm758714
Someone in slack mentioned a new round of beta testers will get access
6.5m$ without ICOs ? or that somehow include ICOs but those are not listed?
ICOs: Byteball/Golem/Sentiel ?
Fiat/Tokens on the left are the amounts they have left to invest in ICOs for ICNP.
Someone in slack mentioned a new round of beta testers will get access
Does this read that ICNX is indeed down today % wise?
That is ICNP not ICNX chart
30% sounds a lot
30% of the set fee from the fund managers %
Are these FUDders paid to do this? Why on Earth would anyone waste their time like this? Amazingly stupid allocation of time.
Only reason they would FUD is to get back in cheaper and get more ICN or it's a competing project. There's no ICN margin trading so that's my guess.
Re: Melonport [MLN] Blockchain Software for Asset Management
From TOS:
"User understands and accepts that MELONPORT has the right to implement in the SMART-CONTRACT SYSTEM a pre-allocation of up to 25% of Pool A MLN TOKEN to third parties for public sale at the same price"
25% is not 170K ETH from Pool A
WTF is going on ?
"User understands and accepts that MELONPORT has the right to implement in the SMART-CONTRACT SYSTEM a pre-allocation of up to 25% of Pool A MLN TOKEN to third parties for public sale at the same price"
25% is not 170K ETH from Pool A
WTF is going on ?
Re: Melonport [MLN] Blockchain Software for Asset Management
Can you explain why the end point for the contract already had 170K ETH in it 6hrs prior to ICO ?
Contract
https://etherscan.io/address/0x3bf541f87056d134e0109be1be92978b26cb09e0
End point
https://etherscan.io/address/0x00ec6379d7186193983e90ba58d3cf169f7e4af3
Contract
https://etherscan.io/address/0x3bf541f87056d134e0109be1be92978b26cb09e0
End point
https://etherscan.io/address/0x00ec6379d7186193983e90ba58d3cf169f7e4af3