I just watched the first one but I can already say that it is quite lame. The guy is just stating "no it wasn't a hoax" as if it was any proof. About the technology, how the hell does he know what tech the government possessed back then? It's a long known truth that the tech we use today is "20 years old" for the military.
Sigh...
This thread contains many examples of why scientific literacy is so important.
I don't know that there's much hope for Hyena in terms of readjusting their thought processes.
Given that his/her posts are riddled with absolutes, they don't appear to realize that this undermines their credibility, regardless of the topic.
This displays a fundamental lack of knowledge regarding what our science has discovered about the nature of reality since the mid-1900's.
...
Instead of telling us something useful and educating you keep on sticking insulting labels on me without anything backing them up. You could as well as tell me to fuck off and that I suck which would be the TLDR version of your message. You are either butthurt or trolling, I don't know and I don't care.
One part of your text was interesting though. You encouraged people to question themselves

which is not a bad idea by the way. You should do it as well. However, equally important is to question everything external to yourself too. For example, one should always question the official story.
Do yourself a favor and research what film technology was available back then.
From there, start watching NASA footage, especially the film For All Mankind.
Conspiracy theorists seem to only reference a few images that they think have some sort of position on. There is too much real footage to be a fake or a hoax. Sure mankind went to space for political reasons, but who cares, it happened.