Even if a 1TH/s miner was produced every minute the difficulty would only increase about 212M per day. If we assume an exponential growth rate of 20% per difficulty change, the increase in hash rate would exceed the production rate of miners in early June. The growth in difficulty will become linear.

Could this be the IceDrill? http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX

HF can determine whatever exchange rate they want. There's no way you'll win in court unless they promised you, specifically, full BTC refunds.

The user just added another 40TH/s.

Can you make one for supermicro power supplies too? I'd be willing to buy a ton of them if they were supermicro compatible.
Something like this  http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-SuperMicro-CSE-PT823-PD5i2-2U-Power-Supply-Backplane-/220979395258 except made with PCI-E connectors in mind.

That "update" was a fake update written by a forum member, and not HashFast.

They have fixed the power consumption since that test, at least that's what I was told when I called them yesterday.

What makes you think that they will be using so much power? 422*.65*1.2=330W is the nominal power usage with 20% added on in case there is a bad die.

-Twitter

Do you think this could be HF too? http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1D5FhoiuLMJJ43BCMGidwvbKWfr71g1vH9

iCEBREAKER hasn't been active since Christmas. Also, he has posted in this thread.

How many times must I tell you, I'm not their puppet.

How perfect is it that this email was sent on a Friday, right before they close for 2 days?

I wonder how long it will take them to realize their mistake.

Can someone with the email verify if it is CAN-SPAM complaint?

Maybe they had the boards, then during testing they found that they were unstable.

And now they violate their privacy policy. https://hashfast.com/privacy-policy/

Well that explains the eligius mining. They are probably using those rev1 modules.