Search content
Sort by

Showing 11 of 11 results by HavingItAll
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 05/03/2025, 11:26:15 UTC
He has accumulated enough so it those not really matter if he buy in the dip all not,

Well, it seems that it does matter but nor for the wrong reason. I wanted to share a video here:

MSTR Stock: Why Volatility Makes the Stock More Attractive, and How It Benefits Long-Term Holders!

The guy has a heavy accent but he is easy to understand. I would say he is French maybe? Anyway, according to this analysis Saylor is trying to be unpredictable to keep his stock as the most volatile one. I don't know to what extent he's right, but he usually provides interesting analyses.
maybe that is what his trying to do, what I believe is that what ever Michel Saylor is doing his doing it to make Bitcoin grow more.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 03/03/2025, 10:40:48 UTC
It looks like there won’t be a weekly purchase announcement today, judging by Saylor’s post on X. A shame he didn’t buy the dip, but I guess with the expected price growth, it’ll be easier for him. In recent weeks, not only had Bitcoin’s price dropped, but also the premium paid for MSTR common stock. If both start rising again, Saylor will be able to easily use the money-making machine of the ATM offering.

He has accumulated enough so it those not really matter if he buy in the dip all not, he believes so much in Bitcoin he can even buy when Bitcoin hits $120k, maybe he is not with enough money to accumulate in this dip.
Like me I didn't accumulate that much this dip because I'm not really stable financially this period so is better I accumulate slowly this period to avoid facing financial challenge later.
I think we should always support Michael Saylor and encourage him his really trying and thank God for people like him in the Bitcoin investment.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 02/03/2025, 12:15:37 UTC
First, the news:

MicroStrategy Adopts Bitcoin as Primary Treasury Reserve Asset
Quote
TYSONS CORNER, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--MicroStrategy® Incorporated (Nasdaq: MSTR), the largest independent publicly-traded business intelligence company, today announced that it has purchased 21,454 bitcoins at an aggregate purchase price of $250 million, inclusive of fees and expenses. The purchase of Bitcoin cryptocurrency was made pursuant to the two-pronged capital allocation strategy previously announced by the company when it released its second quarter 2020 financial results on July 28, 2020.

Source link: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200811005331/en/MicroStrategy-Adopts-Bitcoin-Primary-Treasury-Reserve-Asset

This is the main statement:

Quote
“Our investment in Bitcoin is part of our new capital allocation strategy, which seeks to maximize long-term value for our shareholders,” said Michael J. Saylor, CEO, MicroStrategy Incorporated. “This investment reflects our belief that Bitcoin, as the world’s most widely-adopted cryptocurrency, is a dependable store of value and an attractive investment asset with more long-term appreciation potential than holding cash. Since its inception over a decade ago, Bitcoin has emerged as a significant addition to the global financial system, with characteristics that are useful to both individuals and institutions. MicroStrategy has recognized Bitcoin as a legitimate investment asset that can be superior to cash and accordingly has made Bitcoin the principal holding in its treasury reserve strategy.”


Coindesk realunched the news:


MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’

Quote
Publicly traded business intelligence firm MicroStrategy purchased 21,454 bitcoin on Tuesday, effectively pouring all $250 million of its planned inflation-hedging funds into the digital currency.

  • Disclosing its bitcoin buy alongside an equivalent stock buyback in a Tuesday Securities and Exchange Commission filing, MicroStrategy, a Nasdaq-listed software firm worth over $1.2 billion, said the cryptocurrency provided a "reasonable hedge against inflation" in a press statement shared with CoinDesk.
  • “This investment reflects our belief that bitcoin, as the world’s most widely adopted cryptocurrency, is a dependable store of value and an attractive investment asset with more long-term appreciation potential than holding cash," said CEO Michael J. Saylor.
  • Saylor cited forces working to weaken fiat currencies – COVID-19, global quantitative easing measures, political and economic uncertainty – but also the technical and qualitative aspects that he said give the bitcoin blockchain strength.
  • “We find the global acceptance, brand recognition, ecosystem vitality, network dominance, architectural resilience, technical utility and community ethos of bitcoin to be persuasive evidence of its superiority as an asset class for those seeking a long-term store of value," Saylor said.
  • The capital allocation quickly fulfills Saylor's late July promise to shareholders that his company, which he founded in 1989, would buy back $250 million in stock and invest an additional $250 million in gold and bitcoin over the next 12 months. The belief was that these and other "alternative investments" would protect MicroStrategy's dollar-heavy balance sheet.
  • It is now clear that half of the $500 million bet turns entirely on bitcoin. MicroStrategy "accordingly has made bitcoin the principal holding in its treasury reserve strategy," Saylor said.

Source link: https://www.coindesk.com/microstrategy-bitcoin-buy-protects-against-fiat-inflation


My Commentary:
This is so big: A publicly traded  firm decided to invest half of his 500 millions excess cash reserves buying bitcoin, deliberately dumping the ever value loser, inflationary, exponentially printed fiat currency, to embrace the superior hard money, digital gold, Bitcoin.
This is so bullish. A new era for Bitcoin in the path of a recognition as a superior Store Of Value.


A few tweet about this:

Gabor Gurbacs
Quote
Publicly traded company MicroStrategy adopts #Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset to hedge against fiat inflation. MicroStrategy  allocates $250mm to Bitcoin. This is a big deal and good to see #Bitcoin used as intended: hard money/savings instrument.
https://twitter.com/gaborgurbacs/status/1293153751549784064

PlanB
Quote
#Phase5
https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1293174076299673600?s=20


Barry Silbert, GrayScale CEO:
Quote
MicroStrategy, a $1.2 billion company, just turned itself into a publicly-traded bitcoin play. Smart
Quote
Gradually, then suddenly
https://twitter.com/barrysilbert/status/1293151330467565570?s=20
https://twitter.com/barrysilbert/status/1293162827478335488?s=20



WSJ reported the news, after a few weeks:

[Suspicious link removed]j.com/articles/cash-is-trash-so-lets-bet-425-million-on-bitcoin-11604070071]‘Cash Is Trash,’ So Let’s Bet $425 Million on Bitcoin[/url]

Quote
MicroStrategy could have gotten rid of its excess cash by paying a big dividend or buying back a ton of stock. Instead, the company made a big digital currency bet.


[img [Suspicious link removed]http://j.net/public/resources/images/OG-FE738_202010_M_20201029121819.gif[/img]


Quote
MicroStrategy’s Mr. Saylor says the primary objective of buying bitcoin isn’t to make the stock go up, but to keep the company’s purchasing power from going down.

Thanks to the Federal Reserve’s immense intervention in the economy, the U.S. monetary supply is soaring—by one measure, up more than 20% this year. Mr. Saylor expects that pace to continue at 10% or 15% annually, not just in the U.S. but globally.

“We realized that cash is trash,” he says, “and we needed either to shrink the capital structure or move our cash into something that is going to float on the flood of liquidity and not sink under the flood of liquidity.”


Second Buy:
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob914e4fd82febd5fd.jpeg
https://twitter.com/michael_saylor/status/1305850568531947520?s=20



Third Buy:

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob7818fd78c552c766.png
https://twitter.com/michael_saylor/status/1334990791496884224?s=20



Here a brief recap of their holdings: they bought very close to the ATH, still they are 60% in the money!

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob71fcfbcf48b6b9bf.png

[LINK]





A few words about Micheal Saylor.


Micheal Saylor himself has been interviewed by Antony Pompliano in his Podcast:

The Pomp Podcast #385: Michael Saylor On Buying Bitcoin With His Balance Sheet

Youtube Version:
The Pomp Podcast #385: Michael Saylor On Buying Bitcoin With His Balance Sheet

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob23caa802918587ea.png
Quote
This is an episode of The Pomp Podcast with host Anthony "Pomp" Pompliano and guest, Michael Saylor, an entrepreneur and business executive, who co-founded and leads MicroStrategy, a company which provides business intelligence, mobile software, and cloud-based services. He has become well known in the Bitcoin community for using the company's ibalance sheet to purchase more than $400 million of Bitcoin.

In this conversation, we discuss how Michael built MicroStrategy, what his $500 million dilemma earlier this year was, and why he choose to put more than $400 million into Bitcoin with the company's balance sheet.



Also thanks to @lucius, a nice article from Bloomberg, detailing a few interesting bits.

Firstly: Saylor is not a bitcoin zealot:
CEO Says Bitcoin Is Safer After Moving Firm’s Cash to Crypto

Quote
Even so, Saylor said he’s not a crypto diehard. If bond yields jump, for instance, he said he won’t hesitate to dump the cryptocurrency, though he has no immediate plans to sell.

“We can liquidate it any day of the week, any hour of the day,”Saylor said. “If I needed to liquidate $200 million of Bitcoin, I believe I could do it on a Saturday. If I took a haircut, I believe it would be 2%.”

Well, we knew that, as for sure he elaborated some thought from 2013:

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob1e156be1c55b824d.jpeg


Another important bit of information, I was already aware of is settlement with the SEC:

Quote

This isn’t the first time Saylor has garnered headlines. He lost billions in personal wealth after the shares tumbled when the company was accused by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of overstating results. Saylor reached a settlement in 2000 without admitting or denying guilt.


More information here.

Micheal Saylor owns 67% of voting rights of MicroStrategy. Just remember that. When he says MicroStrategy decided to" he's actually saying "I decided to".

From their SEC Filing:
Quote
Because of the rights of our two classes of common stock, and because we are controlled by our existing holders of class B common stock, these stockholders could transfer control of MicroStrategy to a third party without the approval of our Board of Directors or our other stockholders, prevent a third party from acquiring MicroStrategy, or limit your ability to influence corporate matters
We have two classes of common stock: class A common stock and class B common stock. Holders of our class A common stock generally have the same rights as holders of our class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share. As of February 2, 2009, holders of our class B common stock owned 2,770,244 shares of class B common stock, or 75.2% of the total voting power. Michael J. Saylor, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned 399,800 shares of class A common stock and 2,429,582 shares of class B common stock, or 67.1% of the total voting power, as of February 2, 2009. Accordingly, Mr. Saylor is able to control MicroStrategy through his ability to determine the outcome of elections of our directors, amend our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and take other actions requiring the vote or consent of stockholders, including mergers, going-private transactions and other extraordinary transactions and their terms.
Source:
https://ir.microstrategy.com/node/17726/html

Recapping with a simple image:

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blobcad67598c6ebb699.png

Saylor controls 67.1% of the voting capital of the company. Hence he can dictate everything in the company.
Of course this can be viewed as a call to stability and focus on business, as they stated in some interviews, but this is actually relevant information not to be ignored while reading the statements in the first paragraph.


Also worth Noticing Salyor himself owns many bitcoins.
 
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob266bb3c29c09c33f.png

https://twitter.com/michael_saylor/status/1321422012380753921?s=20

Again, the point he informed the managers, is laughable.




I love how you write with fact, you have done well in creating this thread here, the more update about Michael Saylor latest Bitcoin accumulation is given here the more it will encourage those who are also Bitcoin investors, I will advise everyone to also follow him in his social media account's in other to get other information from him, Michael Saylor may buy more Bitcoin in this Bitcoin dip there by also encouraging his followers to do same.
I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone not to be scared of this Bitcoin dip is not new so it will rise again just be patient and continue your buying Bitcoin we are all in this together.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 01/03/2025, 13:05:50 UTC
[edited out]
thank you so much for your explanation i was expecting more people to also say something about this.
Many older posters (members) do not tend to enjoy responding to newer members who seem to be adding little to no value, even if you may well consider your questions to have had been probative and/or  interesting.  

Essentially, I consider that your questions hardly show that you are contributing much if any substance either to the conversation or even demonstrating that you are employing meaningful kinds of efforts to grapple with your raised topics in meaningful, interesting and/or real person kinds of ways.
well no problem, it will always be interesting if people who are also buying Bitcoin and holding it for long time have discussions like this, and I may be a new member here but those not mean I'm new into Bitcoin investment and I think I may even be investing in Bitcoin even long than some old members here, is just that I got to know about this place recently, it will be more interesting if people like Michael Saylor knows about a place like this and then join us in discussions.

I doubt that we need Michael Saylor in order to fulfill our abilities to talk about topics, especially since this forum allows anyone to share their ideas and experiences... so you might want to consider weaving in some of your ideas and experiences beyond speaking in generalities and seemingly trite and/or trollish-style questions.

[edited out]
Yea, some older members consider responding to the newbies as a waste of time because some of the new comers neither respond to conversation or flow in a positive way.
Anyone who is close to a decade in this forum must have studied the pattern of most newbies and that is why some of them tend to doubt all the newbies and even show some level of aggressiveness towards them. But it is fine we treat them with meekness or ignore instead of discourage them.

You have your right to strike whatever tone and/or balance that you like in your personal demeanor and your chosen ways of interacting  with other forum members.  That's your choice....   Some forum members may well choose to be more confrontational and/or aggressive, which might not suit your preferences... but what you going to do about it?  Report them?  or try to convince them to be nicer from your point of preferences?

Some threads (and some sections of the forum) have more beginner topics than others. There is even a beginner section of the forum too. 

It seems that the 82 pages of this thread have some more advanced topics especially if we might be describing some variations of how Saylor is employing financial instruments, and historically we have had some pretty dumb questions and repetition of superficial assessments coming into this thread from time to time, so I see nothing wrong with some members (including your truly) choosing to not being as welcoming to some of the various kinds of superficial and/or the seemingly ill-informed posts.  You are free to choose your own style, which I suppose your currently chosen style is to elect to disagree with my chosen style (or my lack of style).

[edited out]
There are several discussions about investing in Bitcoin for a long term in the forum. It is also a pleasure to engage in discussions with like minds since you will be opened up to new ideas that will be beneficial to your Bitcoin investment. The forum promotes privacy, which is why you are not expected to register with your name or go through any KYC process. Michael Saylor might have an account here but his username will not be his real name.

That is correct.  Saylor might already be here.  Perhaps?  This forum allows for talking about ideas rather than getting caught up in identities, even though some members are publicly known, but  many are not.
You are right JayJuanGee you are one of the peoples that supports Bitcoin very well in this forum you know a lot about Bitcoin investment and how to succeed in it keep it up, I went to research about this forum and I discovered the main reason satoshi nakamoto created this forum is for Bitcoin discussion and you are really doing well in it.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 28/02/2025, 23:46:46 UTC
well no problem, it will always be interesting if people who are also buying Bitcoin and holding it for long time have discussions like this, and I may be a new member here but those not mean I'm new into Bitcoin investment and I think I may even be investing in Bitcoin even long than some old members here, is just that I got to know about this place recently, it will be more interesting if people like Michael Saylor knows about a place like this and then join us in discussions.
There are several discussions about investing in Bitcoin for a long term in the forum. It is also a pleasure to engage in discussions with like minds since you will be opened up to new ideas that will be beneficial to your Bitcoin investment. The forum promotes privacy, which is why you are not expected to register with your name or go through any KYC process. Michael Saylor might have an account here but his username will not be his real name.
Bitcoin is indeed very interesting in the long run particularly when one can discuss with other people in the world with similar ideas in mind. Having a space that ensure that we do not cross each other’s personal paths and having that privacy, we are relieved of the burden of identity in our interaction hence making the interaction lee natural. This freedom can enable us access more information that would help in the decision making. Every person has his/her vision about opportunities in the within the crypto space and, of course, the discussion adds extra value. Such diversity is the reason why this kind of forum is useful to anyone aspiring to be a continued growth with regards to Bitcoin investment.
you have spoken well and you are very correct, that privacy will really help us in this forum, like now I can say the account of Bitcoin I have and also seek advice if I should pause my accumulation or continue, i can only mention the amount of Bitcoin I have accumulated here because I know no body really knows my face or my real identity, now I see the reason why nickname is preferred here.
I love the privacy here it gives one freedom to engage in conversation without thinking about ur background or people that will see you.
This privacy also will give room to a lot of scammers here and i don't think I will do any business here it should be only discussion and nothing more to prevent getting scammed.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 28/02/2025, 19:18:38 UTC
well no problem, it will always be interesting if people who are also buying Bitcoin and holding it for long time have discussions like this, and I may be a new member here but those not mean I'm new into Bitcoin investment and I think I may even be investing in Bitcoin even long than some old members here, is just that I got to know about this place recently, it will be more interesting if people like Michael Saylor knows about a place like this and then join us in discussions.
There are several discussions about investing in Bitcoin for a long term in the forum. It is also a pleasure to engage in discussions with like minds since you will be opened up to new ideas that will be beneficial to your Bitcoin investment. The forum promotes privacy, which is why you are not expected to register with your name or go through any KYC process. Michael Saylor might have an account here but his username will not be his real name.
oh that's true he may be using a different name over here, yeah I checked out some places also and I saw they are also engaging in discussion about Bitcoin investment and is a great one, I'm loving it here already.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 28/02/2025, 18:02:12 UTC
[edited out]
thank you so much for your explanation i was expecting more people to also say something about this.

Many older posters (members) do not tend to enjoy responding to newer members who seem to be adding little to no value, even if you may well consider your questions to have had been probative and/or  interesting.  

Essentially, I consider that your questions hardly show that you are contributing much if any substance either to the conversation or even demonstrating that you are employing meaningful kinds of efforts to grapple with your raised topics in meaningful, interesting and/or real person kinds of ways.
well no problem, it will always be interesting if people who are also buying Bitcoin and holding it for long time have discussions like this, and I may be a new member here but those not mean I'm new into Bitcoin investment and I think I may even be investing in Bitcoin even long than some old members here, is just that I got to know about this place recently, it will be more interesting if people like Michael Saylor knows about a place like this and then join us in discussions.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 28/02/2025, 07:19:04 UTC
[edited out]
I read all you said and I must commend you for your wonderful write up, Bitcoin is a very investment, i really don't know why some people don't like Bitcoin investment maybe because Bitcoin is volatile in nature but see nothing wrong with that as long as Bitcoin keeps growing, my regret is not mining Bitcoin and also not starting Bitcoin investment when the price was very small, I have friends who started accumulating and holding Bitcoin when it was not up to $500 and some are still holding till date why some have sold there own and has made huge amount of money that has changed there life and they can never be poor again, but I'm happy I didn't wait till today, one of them introduced me to this forum and I have been that a lot of people here and accumulating and holding Bitcoin you guys should keep it up Bitcoin has a great future.
First:  As Free Market Capitalist mentioned, you do not need to quote my whole post in order to respond to it.

Second:  Even if you have regrets about not entering into mining or not investing into bitcoin at earlier times, that seems meaningless, since we cannot turn back the clock.. and so in that regard, we have to consider what we are going to do from today and here into the future rather than regretting about what we had not done in prior times that are not coming back. Sure, no problem attempting to learn from the past, but more importantly is figuring what to do from today, and hopefully acting upon what we had learned rather than just thinking about it. Of course, MSTR and Saylor may also inspire individuals, even though some of MSTR and Saylor's strategies might have to be modified in the event that individuals are wanting to follow some variation of what MSTR has been doing.

Third: comparing yourself to your friends or to what others are doing or have done also seems quite a bit less meaningful as contrasted with figuring out what your own plan might be and how to act upon such plan, if you were to have one, and of course, in this thread, we are talking about MSTR, so it may be better to try to focus on that (even though I know that I have also been guilty of some divergence from the main topic of this thread)..
ok talking about MSTR is Michael Saylor Bitcoin accumulation really part of what is making Bitcoin grow, because to me I see by buy using those huge amount of money to accumulate Bitcoin and posting it is a way to make bitcoin more valuable, and if people like him who are using huge amount of money to amount Bitcoin sell of all there Bitcoin and stop accumulating and holding them will it result to Bitcoin fall, we where talking about this just today and some set of people said if people like Michael Saylor and others should stop investing in Bitcoin that Bitcoin will lose it value what is your take on that.

I doubt that there is any kind of simple answer since there are all kinds of individuals, entities and governments buying bitcoin, besides what Saylor/MSTR is doing. 

Sure, folks can get caught up on attempts at simple explanations, yet BTC price moves are based on aggregated behaviors across a lot of exchanges around the world, and including OTC buying/selling of bitcoin and other ways that folks might buy or sell their BTC.  BTC spot ETFs have also provided a lot of new avenues for folks to get BTC price exposure, and those BTC spot ETF owners need to buy bitcoin to back up the shares or to run risk of not having the BTC that they claim to have if the BTC prices shoot up.. which could cause them a lot of financial issues if they don't have the BTC they claim to have.

Saylor/MSTR is a pretty good marketer of bitcoin, and yeah they could  stop marketing  bitcoin, and  there are others who  are pretty good marketers of bitcoin, and they could stop as well.  Bitcoin does not have any official marketing team, yet a lot of folks are marketing bitcoin and not really getting specifically paid to market bitcoin, especially the more that they learn about it,  the more they may well talk positively about bitcoin.

Since you are new to this forum, hopefully you are not getting overly caught up upon simple explanations regarding bitcoin's price dynamics, but instead figuring out your own allocation to bitcoin and  figuring out to establish a decently good sized stake in bitcoin, since it can take a pretty long ass time to build a decently good bitcoin stake if you have not already been doing it for a while or if you have not already front loaded your bitcoin investment, and even if you are just getting into bitcoin, it is likely a good idea to plan to either build your investment for 4-10 years or longer and/or to hold your bitcoin investment for 4-10 years or longer, even if you had been able to frontload or to lump sum into bitcoin rather than investing over a longer period of time....

Many times it is practical to invest into bitcoin over a long period of time, since many times many of us are not professional investors with stacks of extra money that we can just move into bitcoin in a short period of time...even though there can be a lot of advantages in regards to front-load investing into bitcoin for folks who have such option.  I think with MSTR, when they started investing into bitcoin, the invested more than 75% of all their cash-reserves into bitcoin, and perhaps they had considered that they were front loading into bitcoin, yet they continued to invest into bitcoin on a fairly regular basis with decently large chunks of any cashflow that they could get, but then to research into various ways to create financial instruments to generate value to  be able to increase their ongoing investment into bitcoin., which they have surely found (and perhaps even created) a unique kind of a niche way of investing into bitcoin, which surely their model is interesting because of the various copy cats  that may or may not be able to execute the model as well as MSTR/Saylor.
thank you so much for your explanation i was expecting more people to also say something about this.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 27/02/2025, 14:38:04 UTC
[edited out]
I read all you said and I must commend you for your wonderful write up, Bitcoin is a very investment, i really don't know why some people don't like Bitcoin investment maybe because Bitcoin is volatile in nature but see nothing wrong with that as long as Bitcoin keeps growing, my regret is not mining Bitcoin and also not starting Bitcoin investment when the price was very small, I have friends who started accumulating and holding Bitcoin when it was not up to $500 and some are still holding till date why some have sold there own and has made huge amount of money that has changed there life and they can never be poor again, but I'm happy I didn't wait till today, one of them introduced me to this forum and I have been that a lot of people here and accumulating and holding Bitcoin you guys should keep it up Bitcoin has a great future.

First:  As Free Market Capitalist mentioned, you do not need to quote my whole post in order to respond to it.

Second:  Even if you have regrets about not entering into mining or not investing into bitcoin at earlier times, that seems meaningless, since we cannot turn back the clock.. and so in that regard, we have to consider what we are going to do from today and here into the future rather than regretting about what we had not done in prior times that are not coming back. Sure, no problem attempting to learn from the past, but more importantly is figuring what to do from today, and hopefully acting upon what we had learned rather than just thinking about it. Of course, MSTR and Saylor may also inspire individuals, even though some of MSTR and Saylor's strategies might have to be modified in the event that individuals are wanting to follow some variation of what MSTR has been doing.

Third: comparing yourself to your friends or to what others are doing or have done also seems quite a bit less meaningful as contrasted with figuring out what your own plan might be and how to act upon such plan, if you were to have one, and of course, in this thread, we are talking about MSTR, so it may be better to try to focus on that (even though I know that I have also been guilty of some divergence from the main topic of this thread)..
ok talking about MSTR is Michael Saylor Bitcoin accumulation really part of what is making Bitcoin grow, because to me I see by buy using those huge amount of money to accumulate Bitcoin and posting it is a way to make bitcoin more valuable, and if people like him who are using huge amount of money to amount Bitcoin sell of all there Bitcoin and stop accumulating and holding them will it result to Bitcoin fall, we where talking about this just today and some set of people said if people like Michael Saylor and others should stop investing in Bitcoin that Bitcoin will lose it value what is your take on that.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 26/02/2025, 21:40:43 UTC
I read all you said and I must commend you for your wonderful write up, Bitcoin is a very investment, i really don't know why some people don't like Bitcoin investment maybe because Bitcoin is volatile in nature but see nothing wrong with that as long as Bitcoin keeps growing, my regret is not mining Bitcoin and also not starting Bitcoin investment when the price was very small, I have friends who started accumulating and holding Bitcoin when it was not up to $500 and some are still holding till date why some have sold there own and has made huge amount of money that has changed there life and they can never be poor again, but I'm happy I didn't wait till today, one of them introduced me to this forum and I have been that a lot of people here and accumulating and holding Bitcoin you guys should keep it up Bitcoin has a great future.

That's great but the first thing you need to do right now is to avoid pyramid quotes.

...

The same. You've been on the forum for a little while but it seems you haven't learned to avoid pyramid quotes.

Michael Saylor of MicroStrategy commented yesterday that Bitcoin is dumping, saying "Bitcoin for sale", in this translation he indicated to grab Bitcoin and hold it more.

It makes sense. He sees Bitcoin as the best financial asset in the world and believes that in the long term, it will keep rising a lot. Any dip is a good opportunity to buy cheap.

Apart from that, I keep reporting all low value posts and they keep getting deleted. Merit fishers are going to have a hard time on this thread. I'm an investor in MSTR, and I'll be keeping an eye on those who come here to make sure they're contributing something constructive, not just repeating information without adding anything of their own.


Thank you Free Market Capitalist, I will go through it and learn what I have to learn, it seems there are a lot of rules and regulations in this forum.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
HavingItAll
on 26/02/2025, 04:32:57 UTC
Generally it is a good idea to figure out some kind of an investment pace into bitcoin that fits within your budget, so you should be taking ONLY from the extra money that you have, and not money that you need for expenses.  Surely there are some kinds of expenses that you might not know that come  up down  the road, so many times it is preferable to keep both an emergency fund and various kinds of back up funds so that you never have to  tap into your bitcoin investment at a time that is not completely of your own choosing.
You are absolutely correct! I have made this mistake before and I know what it cost me to sell part of my Bitcoin at huge losses because I needed to attend to my urgent bills. This is not funny at all and I hope other investors would scrutinize your opinion many times so they can digest it, avoid similar attempt in the future. It is not funny at all when you intend to hold your Bitcoin for as long as possible and suddenly you had an emergency to attend to. I just hope such unfortunate event would never happen to us. Also this was due to unplanned necessity that needed to be put in place before making any financial investment. We just have to keep some funds so that in case of any unforseen bills, one can take care of it asap.
It seems to me that most people should be considering bitcoin as an investment that is 4-10 years or longer, and  the only reason to be thinking about less than 10 years is if you have age and/or health particulars that prevent you from being able to project your bitcoin investment in a longer timeline... .. so if we might presume that you are not fitting in the category of elderly or enfirmed, then we should presume your timeline to be 10 years or longer...

So you don't have to rush your investment.  You can try to invest as aggressively as you are able to without overdoing it, yet if you do not have back up funds, you need to be trying to build them up at the same time that you are building up your bitcoin investment.  Once you get your emergency funds up to 3 months (and then maybe you would have 3 months in bitcoin too), then you may be able to start to become even more aggressive in your bitcoin investment, yet you also have to consider that you don't even want to be tapping into your emergency funds, so you also might have to make sure that you build another month or two  or more of various kinds of back up funds.  I am not claiming to know  your particulars, but each of us has to have these kinds of back up funds so that we are not forced to sell out of any of our BTC and we are not contributing to our own creation of emergencies in situations that no emergency should exist if we had engaged in better preparations.  So it could be the case that you might need 5 months or more of back up funds (that includes your 3 months of emergency funds) before you are really able to become more aggressive in your approach to your bitcoin investment.

I know many of us would like to get rich quick (sooner rather than  later), but investment takes time, and if we let our bitcoin build on itself (and even compound in value over time), we likely will still be able to enjoy greater feelings of wealth based on our having had built up our bitcoin investment, and it is also likely that our  standard of living is able to go up after we have spent some time building our foundation levels of investment into bitcoin and also foundations to good cashflow management practices.
Buddy dont sound like you are not sure that hows it should be. Your right here, because i know this is not the first you figure it our that its truly the best strategy for everyone to consider Bitcoin as a 4-10 year investment plan.

I think that it is dogmatic to attempt to impose your values onto others, and yeah, frequently our posts are going to create impressions that we are recommending or telling others what to do, yet in the end, each person has to come to their own conclusions about whether to invest into bitcoin and how to invest into bitcoin, including recognizing and appreciating that bitcoin is not guaranteed to be successful, yet probably we could guarantee that no one is going to lose more than 100% that they put in, as long as they do not use leverage.

Many times, I use pretty strong language and call people retards who are arguing against investing into bitcoin, yet at the same time, I consider that each person has to figure out how to come to bitcoin under his own direction, and to be responsible for his actions and/or inactions in regards to investing into bitcoin or not doing so.

However its not like its necessary for all investors to set longer time frames because some might have financial situations which make them so set shorter time frames especially based on personal goals.

Some of my own ideas (opinions) have evolved on this topic, and I have come to conclude that investing needs to be 4-10 years or longer other wise it is trading if it is less than 4 years, and even the time frame of 4-10 years would be short term investing and potentially trading, except surely some folks do not have an ability to commit towards investing into bitcoin for more than 4-10 years because of age and/or health considerations. 

I am mostly against trading bitcoin or getting into bitcoin for less than 4 years to try to play bitcoin's price wave, yet I can understand that some folks might choose to take those kinds of chances with money that they believe they need in less than a 4-year time horizon.

There can be exceptions for longer time frames but to invest for less than 10 years, the risk of selling too soon increases. That is why having an emergency fund matters a lot. Emergency fund will prevent the investor from selling their Bitcoin when those health challenges occur.

None of us can really particularize  the extent to which someone might consider that they are not able to commit to investing more than 10 years, and there are some folks with serious health concerns (or degenerative conditions) that the are already expecting to cut into their cashflows, and aging itself is a degenerative condition in which folks might consider that they are not ready, willing or able to increase their income sources, and they might even have income sources that they already know are drying up within certain timeframes, so then they would  be expecting to draw on their bitcoin to supplement their income sources that they expect to be drying up. We cannot necessarily wish away another persons assessments of their timeline based on health/age considerations, and they might already be in  a situation that they acknowledge that they might have fucked up in their younger times, but they have to work within the parameters that they are rather than trying to turn back time and be able to do it over.

Emergency fund is not going to do shit to save some folks from already known financial cashflow constraints, perhaps already known cuts to housing  and food budgets, and perhaps even years of already liquidating various assets and/or properties.  Many times we consider emergency funds to be short term interventions that might deal with sudden loss of income or increase in expenses that might be rectified after some time for someone who might be still able to work, but still some emergencies might be happening when folks are in their late 50s or into their 60s, and maybe they are not in a position to recuperate from any emergencies that might be covered by the emergency fund for the short term, but then they might have to transition into some status in which they have more of a longer term loss of income or increases in their expenses.

Even at old age it does not limit the investor to project their investment to a decade because they can set it aside for their heirs to inherit. Age is not a limitation to how long we can project our investment in my opinion.

You are living in a fantasy, if you are trying to impose your own expectations of your own situation (or how you might prepare yourself) as compared with our talking in generalities about how some folks might be limited by both their age and also by various preparations (or lack of preparations) that they might have had been able to succeed in in their earlier years, perhaps when they still could earn income.

There are financial preparations, social support system preparations (such as family), infrastructure preparations in regards to where a person might be living and there can be a lot of limits in terms of a persons geography or nation or even if they might have various physical limitations.

Sure age might not always be a major factor if some elderly folks might have various fall backs, but we cannot presume certain kinds of fall backs to exist, especially when we are talking about these potential kinds of limitations in general ways.

It seems to me that most people should be considering bitcoin as an investment that is 4-10 years or longer, and  the only reason to be thinking about less than 10 years is if you have age and/or health particulars that prevent you from being able to project your bitcoin investment in a longer timeline... .. so if we might presume that you are not fitting in the category of elderly or enfirmed, then we should presume your timeline to be 10 years or longer...
I have found out that long term holders are the ones that are making the most profits from Bitcoin because of the patience to hold for couples of years as the price of Bitcoin keeps hitting more Xs gradually.

Some of the 3x to 5x to 10x will come in bursts, and sure the BTC price may go back and forth, but there are certain periods that any of us could end up getting fucked if we choose to shave off a certain portion of our BTC hoping to buy back cheaper, but then the BTC price goes shooting up rather than down.

It is not even really that long ago to consider up to 7x between the lows of 2022 until the recent high of $109k in January, so there can be periods in which the price moves up quite a bit and then does not have very much likelihood of correcting back down (even though the extent of any future correction is never completely known, but we get some ideas that at some points, we are not too likely to be revisiting some of the lower price arenas). 

Holding Bitcoin can even be more profitable than trading it because in trading, you can make a profit of $5k this month and by next month you could be lossing $8k because of the uncertainty in the crypto market. But when you are holding Bitcoin, even though price keepa going down, you will see it as an opportunity to buy more bags rather than complaining of your crypto portfolio value reducing. Holding patiently is a great virtue!

I think that there are some truths in the various assessments that there are only a  few days each year (like maybe 10 or so) that most of BTC's profits are made, and if you happen to be out of BTC at that time, then you miss most of the gainz.  It is not easy to really know in advance when those 10-ish days per year are, which causes a decent amount of justification to not even take the chance of being out at one or more of the wrong times.

So you don't have to rush your investment.  You can try to invest as aggressively as you are able to without overdoing it, yet if you do not have back up funds, you need to be trying to build them up at the same time that you are building up your bitcoin investment.  Once you get your emergency funds up to 3 months (and then maybe you would have 3 months in bitcoin too), then you may be able to start to become even more aggressive in your bitcoin investment, yet you also have to consider that you don't even want to be tapping into your emergency funds, so you also might have to make sure that you build another month or two  or more of various kinds of back up funds.  I am not claiming to know  your particulars, but each of us has to have these kinds of back up funds so that we are not forced to sell out of any of our BTC and we are not contributing to our own creation of emergencies in situations that no emergency should exist if we had engaged in better preparations.  So it could be the case that you might need 5 months or more of back up funds (that includes your 3 months of emergency funds) before you are really able to become more aggressive in your approach to your bitcoin investment.
I have some backup funds scattered in fiat so in case of any emergency bills, I can attend to it asap without any panic.
Experience is the best teacher and I've learnt the hard way and I hope that other investors whether short term or long term would make sure they have a backup funds to take care of any emergency that ever comes their way.

There may be several ways in which none of us would completely have 3 months of cash just sitting around, even though the idea of emergency funds is that it should be pretty liquid and it should be in our local currency (or some kind of a stable currency, such as dollars).

There are probably a lot of us who might have cash crunches from time to time, so we may well end up having to move around various funds or to prepare ourselves for some expenses that we know are coming in in the near future.  Sometimes we might have various sources of funds (or assets) upon which we can draw, if we need some cushion money, and we might not even realize, sometimes, how we might be running out of various kinds of cushion funds of if we might  have to attempt to draw on an asset or currency that is less liquid, such as knowing that we might need to have around 4 weeks before we can have that asset/currency available to us.  So one thing is how available the asset/currency is, and then another thing might be questioning how volatile  that asset might be compared with our local currency (presumptively we are paying bills/expenses in our local currency, mostly).

As I am investing in Bitcoin, I am also making sure that I invest in physical business so the profits I'm getting from the business can be used to grow other businesses and as back up funds.

Businesses in themselves might not be a better place to put money as compared with bitcoin, yet if you are involved in a business, then frequently value that you are putting into the business might be able to help to leverage various skills and/or abilities and/or position that you have so that you can earn an income from your labor and/or your skills.  So for sure when we are building our bitcoin investment, we need to be generating income (many times from our labor) to then perhaps later get to a point that we might not need to work in the future to be able to live off of our investments. bitcoin  and perhaps some other investments that we have that may or may not require much if any work input from us.

Yep.  If you are using money that you know that you are going to need, even a few months down the road, then you are trading (gambling) rather than investing, and any of us can make mistakes to take chances with our expenses and then we end up making mistakes. I have made those kinds of mistakes on  more than one occasion, yet we we see that the mistakes tend to have greater repercussions than if we had followed better practices, then we realize that we have to figure out ways to make sure that we are not engaging in behaviors that increase the chances that we are going to end up having to suffer through those kinds of repercussions.

In other words, we have to try to make sure that we are not gambling with our investment, and we are truly using money that we do not need to make our bitcoin investments. It can take a while to build up these kinds of better practices, and sure sometimes we are going to feel that we have too much cash sitting around and not doing anything, yet after we have experienced some of the difficulties we will also come to realize that even cash sitting around is serving a purpose, and we should be able to become more and more  comfortable  with our chosen balance, which means that we are getting better and better at managing our cashflow balances.
To be frank, there are lots of people that tend to invest their money in Bitcoin without knowing that they are indirectly gambling with their investments. Just imagine trying to use a little amount of capital, let's say $100 to make $30k because there are rumors that some people, maybe traders are investing in new projects that is giving them huge profits, maybe as high as $10k from a single crypto projects.

Newbies are the ones that do fall for these kind trap. Instead of them to invest in Bitcoin and keep holding their Bitcoin portfolio even though it's not as much as we think, some would want to make huge profits from the crypto market by invest in memecoins instead of Bitcoin where they have have full relaxation that their invest is safe and secure from rug pulls. Trading is a form of gambling but from a different perspective. A trader can not always be in profit but an investor can always be on profit especially holding great asset like Bitcoin without selling your portfolio even when the price of Bitcoin is down.

Yes, having bitcoin can create opportunities to be  able to enter into other kinds of investment (trades/projects/shitcoins), and so there can be an alure of being able to leverage bitcoin and to be able to increase the bitcoin, which like you say, may not end up doing too well in terms of how a person is choosing to use his time, energies and his bitcoin.. and he may well would have had been better to just focus on building his bitcoin through more mundane ways of buying it on a regular basis and working on earning income in other ways to just buy bitcoin.  So if we keep buying bitcoin persistently, consistently and regularly, there should be some assurance that our bitcoin stash is growing larger, yet we cannot always have confidence that our bitcoin is going to go up in value. 

If we study and understand bitcoin, we should be able to recognize and appreciate that bitcoin as an asymmetric bet to the upside, so the most we could lose is 100%, while at the same time there is ongoingly great upside potential including that it might be the best investment available, yet even if bitcoin is the best investment available, it is still not guaranteed to go up in value.

Surely it tends to be a much better feeling when our bitcoin holdings are in profits as compared to when they are not in profits, so there can be degrees of bad management, and the worst would be selling at a loss, and surely it is not as bad to sell at a profit, yet it is still not good BTC portfolio management to be selling your investment merely because you are either engaging in poor cashflow management or you are tempted to tap into your bitcoin investment at a time that is way before your 10 years or more investment timeline.

Another value of holding onto your bitcoin investment for a long time is that its value continues to compound upon itself, so instead of getting profits that are less than one doubling, you may well end up getting several doublings, and the doublings really compound upon themselves.

In one of my earlier posts I outline 9-ish doubling from 2015 to present, which also shows that each doubling becomes more powerful resulting in 256x in profits or maybe even 512x in profits after the next doubling.  If you continuously take money out, you end up missing out on the compounding events that are not guaranteed but still bitcoin has not really weakened in the strength in its investment thesis over the past 10-ish  years, even if some of the upside potential is not as exponential.
So, let's look at the historical numbers and the timeline from 2015 to present again.
0)   $250  (2015)                                    1X
1)    $500  (2015-2016)                           2X
2)    $1,000    (2016-2017)        2X * 2 = 4X
3)    $2,000  (2017)                  4X * 2 = 8X
4)    $4,000  (2017-2020)          8X * 2 = 16X
5)    $8,000   (2017-2020)        16X * 2 = 32X
6)    $16,000  (2017-2022)       32X * 2 = 64X
7)    $32,000  (2021-2023?)      64X * 2 = 128X
8 )    $64,000  (2021-?)             128X * 2 = 256X
9)    $128,000  (?)                    256X * 2 = 512X
Bitcoin has really appreciated from nothing to a great project many firms and whales are looking ahead to accumulate for a lifestime profitability. For Bitcoin to have 512X since 2015, it means that the future is bright and Bitcoin could hit more worth as the adoption keeps increasing. It means that if we start counting how many x Bitcoin has reach from 2010, it could exceed 2000x from the beginning.

I suppose that I was choosing to depict bitcoin within my own timeline of being in bitcoin, even though frequently, I don't like to go back before 2012 when making comparisons of bitcoin to other assets, since prior to 2012, bitcoin had a price less than $5 for much of that time (even though I know it shot up to $32 in 2011), but still I don't tend to  consider it fair to be using bitcoin prices prior to January 2012, and  January 2012 we can use $5 as kind of nice round number  as bitcoin's price starting point (in order to attempt to be more fair).  I know that there are some folks who are starting from even later dates than  me, and I am not even opposed to some ideas of starting out looking at bitcoin at $1k in order to make comparisons to other assets/investment possibilities.
I read all you said and I must commend you for your wonderful write up, Bitcoin is a very investment, i really don't know why some people don't like Bitcoin investment maybe because Bitcoin is volatile in nature but see nothing wrong with that as long as Bitcoin keeps growing, my regret is not mining Bitcoin and also not starting Bitcoin investment when the price was very small, I have friends who started accumulating and holding Bitcoin when it was not up to $500 and some are still holding till date why some have sold there own and has made huge amount of money that has changed there life and they can never be poor again, but I'm happy I didn't wait till today, one of them introduced me to this forum and I have been that a lot of people here and accumulating and holding Bitcoin you guys should keep it up Bitcoin has a great future.