I understand the frustration, but I think there’s a bigger picture to consider here. While Bitcoin may not be classified as "money" in a traditional sense by governments, it still holds value, and that's what matters. From the perspective of regulators, if users are risking something of value (whether it's fiat or crypto), there’s a need to ensure the integrity of the system, protect users, and prevent illegal activities like money laundering.
Licenses, in theory, are meant to provide a level of trust, fairness, and transparency in gambling operations. The fact that Bitcoin isn’t "officially" money doesn't change the reality that it’s used for transactions and people can lose or gain significant amounts through gambling.
Regarding Curaçao or any other regulatory body, yes, they’re capitalizing on the booming crypto gambling industry, but regulation doesn't necessarily mean a bad thing if it's done properly. It can help legitimize the space and protect users.
As much as I appreciate the freedom crypto offers, I think we have to strike a balance between innovation and responsibility.