Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 27 results by HonestAbeX1
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
DeFi Mining/Farming with New Money Market Protocol on TRON
by
HonestAbeX1
on 13/11/2020, 06:53:47 UTC
Circulate Finance will launch sometime this weekend Nov 13 to 15, 2020.  It is essentially an Aave like protocol except on TRON with faster transaction processing and significantly lower energy/gas cost.  With regular activities such as depositing tokens to earn interest income or borrowing funds using deposited tokens as collateral, users will mine/farm the platform's native governance token CIR and also get to share in a portion of the fee revenues.

Check out more detailed info in the altcoin announcement post:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5288626.0

Website:  https://www.circulate.finance/
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][CIR] Circulate Finance - New Money Market Protocol Launching on TRON
by
HonestAbeX1
on 13/11/2020, 04:56:40 UTC
Yes, it is TRC-20
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Topic OP
[ANN][CIR] Circulate Finance - New Money Market Protocol Launching on TRON
by
HonestAbeX1
on 11/11/2020, 23:56:59 UTC
Circulate Finance is a new decentralized, non-custodial money market protocol that addresses and improves upon identified issues resulting from a thorough analysis of current mainstream projects in DeFi. Users can participate as depositors to earn passive income or as borrowers with over-collateralized (perpetual) or under-collateralized (one-block liquidity) positions.

The primary innovation is a sustainable DeFi tokenomics model that extends beyond traditional LP mining by supporting a progressively growing price floor on CIR, the native platform token. Platform profits are also shared directly with its users in order to foster adoption and create further value in the eco-system. Fast transaction execution speed and significantly lower cost energy/gas fees measured in pennies on TRON blockchain ensure a superior user experience relative to comparable Ethereum Dapps.

Presale Details:
· Token Ticker Symbol:  CIR (TRC-20)
· Start of the presale: November 10, 2020 12:00 UTC
· End of the presale: November 15, 2020 12:00 UTC
· Presale amount: 500,000 (5%)
· Max supply: 10,000,000
· Price of a CIR token: 1.49253731 USDT
· Hard Cap: 746,268.655 USDT
· Min & Max buy: no limits
· Unsold token: 100% to Circulate DAO Governance

Where To Buy:
Official site: https://www.circulate.finance/
Supported wallet: Tronlink
Accepted payment: USDT (TRC-20)

Token Distribution:
Tokens purchased in the presale will be distributed following the schedule below:
10% upon launch (November 15, 2020)
20% on day 8.
30% on day 15.
20% on day 21.
20% on day 28.

Website: https://www.circulate.finance/
Telegram: https://t.me/circulatefinance
Twitter: https://twitter.com/CirculateTeam
Medium: https://circulatefinance.medium.com
Github: https://github.com/Circulate-Finance/Circulate-Protocol
Test Beta: https://alpha.circulate.finance/

Screenshot Mockup: https://imgur.com/a/qsUd7sc
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ, a new fast and friendly Equihash <144,5> <192,7> <96,5> Cuda miner.
by
HonestAbeX1
on 08/04/2019, 08:38:48 UTC
Hi, starting with the latest version m, it seems the argument --cuda-devices # # is no longer recognized because the miner seems to ignore it and just mines with all gpus.  It worked with all prior versions up to version l correctly.  Could you investigate and resolve please?  Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: TT-Miner: ProgPoW, MTP, UBQHASH, ETHASH for Windows, CUDA 10.0 & 9.2
by
HonestAbeX1
on 15/01/2019, 19:10:52 UTC
Hey, recently discovered your TTminer and now tinkering with version 0.2.15 mining with MTP algo.

One interesting thing running it on a rig with 4x 1080s is that I tried various settings to core and mem overclock, yet no matter what setting I use it seems to not have any effect on the hash rate.  I also ran eth-pill but that also seem to not have any effect for me either.

So observing this I even try weird combo of underclock both core -200 and mem -450, and still hashing at the same rate, almost like it runs at a predefined fixed setting on my 1080s.  Could this actually be the case?

Also, when it mines for Dev fee, does the miner ever display that it is doing so?  Not sure since I do not notice much.

BTW it looks like you put in a lot of hard work into developing and refining TTminer, and this latest version (for MTP) seems quite stable and problem free so far.  Kudos to you.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
HonestAbeX1
on 16/12/2018, 19:03:30 UTC
The one thing that really caught my attention about SUQA from the very beginning was the talk about the creation of a SUQA ecosystem that fostered transactions exclusively in SUQA.  This news was supposed to be originally elaborated on back in late Oct to early Nov and nothing.  On the latest timeline I see that ecosystem commencement to be started on Dec 30, 2018.

Is there any detailed information on what the heck this SUQA ecosystem exactly is, considering SUQA Foundation plans to start registering members in just two weeks?  Is it not just basic logic to provide some more information prior to user registration if one is to expect to get any user registrations or do they merely expect pure blind faith on our part?!!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POW]SCC Probably the only parallel blockchain in the world can succeed
by
HonestAbeX1
on 03/12/2018, 08:08:23 UTC
There is another coin with the same ticker SCC - StakeCubeCoin making this very confusing!
Even worse is StakeCubeCoin got involved in some recent hack where many investors lost all of their staking coins that resided on some server.
Post
Topic
Board Mining speculation
Re: BITTECH Announces New 28 TH/s ASIC
by
HonestAbeX1
on 27/09/2018, 21:30:25 UTC
I checked Bittech website today and all 3 of their SHA-256 ASICs are "in stock".  I am intrigued by their One Mini model due to the quieter sound rating.

So what is the scoop?  Is this real physical product or just complete vapourware?!!  Did ANYONE actually order and receive any of these ASICs?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] FutureBit Project Apollo: Bringing ASIC Mining Back to the Home Miner!
by
HonestAbeX1
on 02/09/2018, 07:11:38 UTC
Just wanted to confirm that this Apollo ASIC is able to mine any Scrypt-based coin including Digibyte-Scrypt?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Bytom Mining - ASIC algorithm now cracked by GPU miners? Big profits?
by
HonestAbeX1
on 27/08/2018, 03:08:04 UTC
Difficulty is cranking up for the past 3 days.
Went from 118/day to 102/day

What is your rig set up like? You are doing 102/day on how many cards? Do you mind sharing these details? I would like to try this with my test rig, it has 5 x GTX 1070s. How much can they pull in per day? You can PM me if you want to share things privately. I will most likely give this a shot if it's 2x - 3x more profitable than Ethereum as claimed on their website.

Your 5x 1070 if run at 1,250 h/s per gpu will probably net you maybe 20 coins right now.  No where near 2x - 3x ethereum profitability but definitely bit more profitable.  I have a 1070Ti directly on a 16x slot that ran at 1,550 h/s so unsure if such a big difference between a 1070 or Ti or due to 16x slot vs 1x riser.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Bytom Mining - ASIC algorithm now cracked by GPU miners? Big profits?
by
HonestAbeX1
on 18/08/2018, 21:10:08 UTC
Wow, this back and forth hashing battle between Bminer and NebuTech has resulted in gpu hashing peformance more than doubling (close to triple?) in just several months for same hardware as before.  I do not recall any other miner on another algo that has resulted in such significant performance gain just due solely to software code.

This leaves one to contemplate how terribly inefficient the original code must have been possibly?  Or were devs intentionally holding back code improvements for later to allow for miner upgrades?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Bytom Mining - ASIC algorithm now cracked by GPU miners? Big profits?
by
HonestAbeX1
on 25/07/2018, 17:18:38 UTC
this algo doesn't need memory overclock youre saying? just core?

Yes, I don't see much, if any difference applying memory overclock as opposed to underclocking, so might as well run it lighter.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Bytom Mining - ASIC algorithm now cracked by GPU miners? Big profits?
by
HonestAbeX1
on 24/07/2018, 07:20:24 UTC
Have you tried out the latest Nebutech 5.1 Windows miner?  It currently blows away the previously vast imorovements of Bminer 9.0!  I tested on a 1080 and 1060 6GB and got approx +25% faster hash on the 1080 and +10% on the 1060, which is significant.

With core overclock slightly and memory underclock, I got one 1080 hashing at 1080 h/s and 1120 h/s on the other, and 550 h/s on 1060 6GB.

I can also confirm previous poster that Kucoin mainnet token waller is now operational.  I checked last week and it was still disabled, so must be very recent.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Bytom Mining - ASIC algorithm now cracked by GPU miners? Big profits?
by
HonestAbeX1
on 23/07/2018, 01:45:11 UTC

how many btm a day is that pulling in now?
Not mining it right now but a few days ago it was 17-19 BTM and then it came down to 12-14 BTM.
 WTM says I should get 15 BTM now.

Such a swamped algo, any new exchanges trading mainnet tokens that USA citizens can use?

In early July, Kucoin announced they would support BTM mainnet tokens, but no ETA was provided and so far the wallet is still not operational yet.  I am waiting because that appears to be the only option.  Gate.io does not accept USA or Canadian accounts which appeared to be the only viable option working right now.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: WildRig: new miner for Wild Keccak algo
by
HonestAbeX1
on 16/07/2018, 17:57:34 UTC
Andrucrypt, running 0.9.17 for extended time period leads me to the following observation.  For whatever reason, the hashing for this miner when it has been running continously for many hours to days seems to slow down due to increased rate of rejected shares.  Maybe it is a memory leak type issue, I dunno.

I do observe that the first hour or two has very low rejected shares rate, and this observation is consistent when you close and reopen the miner.  So for now, what works best for me is to run a .bat file that runs the miner for 2 to 3 hours, shut it down, and reopen it again for optimal performance.

Don't know how you can easily troubleshoot this type of issue but I am at least pointing it out.  I do think your miner outperforms both ccminer and the openCl miner in terms of net raw performance at the pool side, but this rejected shares issue is inhibiting optimal overall speed.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: WildRig: new miner for Wild Keccak algo
by
HonestAbeX1
on 15/07/2018, 18:04:44 UTC
Okay, after some further testing some weird stuff occurs.

One rig (3-560/1-580) hashes away just fine for nearly 1,000 submitted shares after 3.5 hours at just 1% rejection rate and around that time suddenly the rejection rate sky rockets with lots of "low difficulty shares" rejected and also "stale shares ... ignore it" that take the rejection rate above 10%.  I basically just close and restart the miner and it likely will be fine again for the initial few hours.

On my other rig (1-560/5-580) it is working a bit better at also roughly 1% rejection rate, but then encountered inability to find mining pools and some disconnects/reconnects including a 3 minute span that resulted in over 30 rejected shares consecutively that caused the miner to restart.

Cannot figure out how to paste a picture so here is some text on the errors:

rejected(2449/22) diff 50.53M "Duplicate share"
waiting for a new job more than 60 seconds, disconnect
reconnect in 10 seconds
no active pools, stop mining
use pool pool.purkproject.com:7777
accepted(2456/22) diff 50.53M luck 123.67%
 ....
rejected(2456/23) diff 50.53M "Low difficulty share"

new job from pool.purkproject.com:7777 diff 85.90M
ADDENDUM APPLIED: 104175 --> 104176  7 blocks added
JSON invalid target:
rejected(2456/24) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/25) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/26) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/27) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/28) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/29) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/30) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/31) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
This one is weird. Seems I need more testing with official Purk pool, and probably do something with gpu mixed rigs. Can you please try new version?

I ran the 0.9.17 version overnight and after 10 hours and nearly 5,000 shares accepted, the rig (that previously had the 10%+ rejected shares rate) only had 1.5% rejected shares.  So seems a lot better.  Will continue running it for few days to reassess.  Now I will also run it on the 5-580/1-560 rig and monitor that.  Thanks for all of the updates and keep up the hard work … it is getting there!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: WildRig: new miner for Wild Keccak algo
by
HonestAbeX1
on 15/07/2018, 04:00:56 UTC
I was previously running 0.9.7 and getting rejected shares in the 3%-4% range which is not out of line.  However, now running both 0.9.7 and 0.9.14 the rejected shares have sky rocketed to the 10% to 10.5% range.  Just wondering what has recently happened? Occurs now on both my AMD 560/580 rigs.
Man, this is too high values. Even 3%-4% not good. Can you update to newer version? 0.9.16 should reduce a bit. Also, what intensity do you use?

Okay, I recheck and on my 3-560/1-580 rig it was 11.5% rejected shares running 0.9.7 and on the 1-560/5-580 rig it was 1.3% rejection running 0.9.14.

I just load and running 0.9.16 and so far after submitting 500 shares the 3-560/1-580 rig now has 1% rejected shares and the other rig down to just 0.5% rejected shares.  So looking good.

I run the 560s at 256 and 580s at 512 intensity respectively.

The other odd quirk is I tested port 7777 on the slower 5 Mh/s rig (3-560/1-580) and it cannot hash at all with 0.9.16 ... only works on port 5555 on Purk pool.

Okay, after some further testing some weird stuff occurs.

One rig (3-560/1-580) hashes away just fine for nearly 1,000 submitted shares after 3.5 hours at just 1% rejection rate and around that time suddenly the rejection rate sky rockets with lots of "low difficulty shares" rejected and also "stale shares ... ignore it" that take the rejection rate above 10%.  I basically just close and restart the miner and it likely will be fine again for the initial few hours.

On my other rig (1-560/5-580) it is working a bit better at also roughly 1% rejection rate, but then encountered inability to find mining pools and some disconnects/reconnects including a 3 minute span that resulted in over 30 rejected shares consecutively that caused the miner to restart.

Cannot figure out how to paste a picture so here is some text on the errors:

rejected(2449/22) diff 50.53M "Duplicate share"
waiting for a new job more than 60 seconds, disconnect
reconnect in 10 seconds
no active pools, stop mining
use pool pool.purkproject.com:7777
accepted(2456/22) diff 50.53M luck 123.67%
 ....
rejected(2456/23) diff 50.53M "Low difficulty share"

new job from pool.purkproject.com:7777 diff 85.90M
ADDENDUM APPLIED: 104175 --> 104176  7 blocks added
JSON invalid target:
rejected(2456/24) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/25) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/26) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/27) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/28) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/29) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/30) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"
rejected(2456/31) diff 85.90M "Low difficulty share"






Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: WildRig: new miner for Wild Keccak algo
by
HonestAbeX1
on 14/07/2018, 22:54:36 UTC
I was previously running 0.9.7 and getting rejected shares in the 3%-4% range which is not out of line.  However, now running both 0.9.7 and 0.9.14 the rejected shares have sky rocketed to the 10% to 10.5% range.  Just wondering what has recently happened? Occurs now on both my AMD 560/580 rigs.
Man, this is too high values. Even 3%-4% not good. Can you update to newer version? 0.9.16 should reduce a bit. Also, what intensity do you use?

Okay, I recheck and on my 3-560/1-580 rig it was 11.5% rejected shares running 0.9.7 and on the 1-560/5-580 rig it was 1.3% rejection running 0.9.14.

I just load and running 0.9.16 and so far after submitting 500 shares the 3-560/1-580 rig now has 1% rejected shares and the other rig down to just 0.5% rejected shares.  So looking good.

I run the 560s at 256 and 580s at 512 intensity respectively.

The other odd quirk is I tested port 7777 on the slower 5 Mh/s rig (3-560/1-580) and it cannot hash at all with 0.9.16 ... only works on port 5555 on Purk pool.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: WildRig: new miner for Wild Keccak algo
by
HonestAbeX1
on 14/07/2018, 17:28:20 UTC
I was previously running 0.9.7 and getting rejected shares in the 3%-4% range which is not out of line.  However, now running both 0.9.7 and 0.9.14 the rejected shares have sky rocketed to the 10% to 10.5% range.  Just wondering what has recently happened? Occurs now on both my AMD 560/580 rigs.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: CryptoDredge 0.6.0: ‎NVIDIA GPU Miner (Windows)
by
HonestAbeX1
on 04/07/2018, 18:57:12 UTC
Any lyra2z hashrates from 1080 users out there?

With CD 0.6, I am getting on a 1080 with 60% pwr +125/-200 core/mem oc about 2.8 Mh/s.  On ccminer 2.3 a similar 1080 tops out at 2.4 Mh/s.