Well said Euggio.  We could all stand to have a bit more of a "live and let live" attitude about this stuff, myself included.

https://blockchain.info/address/3MrNuksZ1VePU3dGiSQFiouWerJUJgDkfH
So what did we bet?  If I was right you had to post "HunterGatherer, you were right about this and I'm sorry for being so negative and cynical and I will try to stop posting FUD in the future."  Is that right?

It's all just wind and noise.  That blade cuts both ways...."The presale numbers are probably fake."  It's all just wind and noise.

I have no idea why they preferred to collect presale funds to unique addresses per transaction and then sweep to the multisig address, but who cares as long as the money gets there as they said it would?  As if you could prove that any of these transactions "actually happened" anyway?  Mine happened. So anyway, what is our wager?

Are you saying that because these purchases weren't transferred to the multisig address effectively in realtime that this is somehow problematic?  The woman said they would be transferred once per day, and I'm betting that tomorrow we will see that this is true.  Rather than debate this point, let just place a wager and then we can both zip it until tomorrow - what do you say?  What would you like to wager?

At first I thought this was fearmongering but then I realized that this is funny HYPster.  BTW, Interesting user name.  Do you see yourself as a purveyor of hype?  
I'm trying to figure out, though, if you actually...possibly....believe that you know more about NeuCoin than this woman who does their PR!  No...it was just a joke.  Like if I were to make a joke......
"I am very sorry HYPster that you are the cuckold to your wife as all the shame will be on you once this is exposed. I sure hope you didn't reveal any personal info here. You have been duped sorry to say. I wish you the best!! Stay safe please."
That would be absurd right?

But that's just it - the stuff I'm responding to is *not* fact.  I guess some is opinion, but so much of it is unsubstantiated it comes across as FUD.  Anyway, if you all just want to stew in your negativity then fine, it's your choice.  You should know that from someone who hasn't spent a ton of time here it sounds desperate and pitiful - like your last ditch effort in life is tied to Bitcoin's success, and that means the demise of any Altcoin. No matter what.  But if you plan to do this publicly you should expect a wake-up call every once in a while from people who approach life with an open mind.

Hi "scam confirmed",
So when did you stop beating your wife?

Regardless of whether or not that statement is true, it doesn't cost me anything to say it right?
And if I repeated it a bunch it puts you on the defensive.  Probably would affect how people think/feel about you.  So should I just say it if I want?

Why is it a "confirmed" scam?  Can you share details?

Wow you're cynical!  I guess that's possible but why "likely"?  Especially give the list of angel investors?  I'll admit - I actually did buy some.


I understand the once-bitten-twice-shy feeling if there have been a lot of scumbags running scams in the digital currency community.  That said, I don;t think you can lump them all in the same bucket.  Or you can if you want, but that just means you'll never be an early adopter in a coin like this. 

Nope, not one of their shills.  Just tired of hearing a bunch of guys agree with each others negative blather, as if your communal agreement makes what you say true.

Hi Jonald_fyookball,
I think there are a few but specifically the variable stake modifier was a smart change, shorter block time, and not using coinage to affect your liklihood of creating a block.  But the security enhancements are sort of the baseline of what everyone expects/needs from a coin.  The bigger benefit - and one I feel like not anyone can just "invent" - is the community they bring to the table.  They could drive adoption *fast*.  Time will tell, but their presale has already sold about 35% and they just started it this afternoon.

Can you hear yourself?  Did you read anything about the research they did to identify/quantify/improve issues with existing coins? (specifically around security).  In your dream world do these random Peercoin-forkers also have access to successful business partners with services that have tens of millions of monthly visitors?  This kind of comment just makes you sound uneducated or at least uninformed.  Maybe NeuCoin will succeed, maybe not, but do you really think that they've added no value on top of Peercoin?