Search content
Sort by

Showing 4 of 4 results by IB
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Spaincoin, the new Auroracoin PUMP
by
IB
on 16/03/2014, 15:08:21 UTC
Greetings, I am https://twitter.com/BTCWhale https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=509928.0

I'm just merely announcing that the my next work is Spaincoin. It's just like Auroracoin, only that in Spain it's actually legal to use digital currencies whereas in Iceland it's not. Which leads me to believe it holds potential and will go beyond Auroracoin. You want to hop on? You're not too late - announced some minutes ago. If not, stay by the sidelines. If you aren't an investor yourself please refrain from talking here.

@BTCWhale on twitter is a known scammer, he's taken credit for pumps he didn't actually do (blackcoin for example) and his pumps have been proven to be unfair and scams at least the ones he holds for his twitter followers. I hope you guys realize that if SPA gets pumped, its not actually because of him, its just him trying to take credit for a pump he didn't do. Below is a link with proof that he is a scammer
http://cryptopumpclub.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5

What he says
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: delete
by
IB
on 13/03/2014, 18:01:53 UTC
If you could spare the time, would you answer my questions, BCX?

How would you see this happen, in order for it to be something trustworthy in your view? What would you consider a trusted third party escrow?
Is there no way to test this, without damage, from where you could constructively aid the developer in strengthening the code? (this is an actual question)

I'm sure you wouldn't be inclined to help something you don't trust, but as I read it, your only objection is the airdrop... Should you know the plan behind the airdrop, or the airdrop take place with the use of an escrow, would that change your mind?
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: delete
by
IB
on 13/03/2014, 10:27:41 UTC
...And since you implicitely stated you are ethical, BCX... is there not a way to test this, without damage, from where you could constructively aid the developer in strengthening the code? (this is an actual question)

I'm sure you wouldn't be inclined to help something you don't trust, but as I read it, your only objection is the airdrop... Should you know the plan behind the airdrop, or the airdrop take place with the use of an escrow, would that change your mind?

To take your worries away the developer could let you in on the exact details of the airdrop plan... It's too bad that, looking at the contents of this thread, there are probably alot of people that would consider that a worrying idea.
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: delete
by
IB
on 13/03/2014, 10:18:21 UTC
There is no logical solution for the "air drop" being anything other than a scam or better said a laundering mechanism for the premine. This is amplified by the fact the AUR Devs have categorically refused to even consider moving the premine to a trusted third party escrow and removing themselves from the air drop. There is one reason they won't.

Add in the fact there is no plan in place to perform a logistics miracle and notify 330,000 Icelandic residents, educate them on what crypto is and disburse the coins in an accurate manner. in less than 11 days...
The airdrop concept is a very logically constructed method of distribution. Whether or not this would be a scam is not a factor in this. The way it is executed could lead one to believe it creates an indication that something may not be quite right (read: scam), but the idea itself nowhere near necessarilly constitutes it.

How would you see this happen, in order for it to be something trustworthy in your view? What would you consider a trusted third party escrow?