Hey, it is an interesting topic.
In my experience, most galleries are not interested because the audience is simply “still” too small. Some galleries are of course open and delighted when more “traditionally known” artists work with NFTs and other digital layers and have a target audience for it, but in my perception “CryptoArt” is simply not established enough yet.... And even less if we want to talk about “Bitcoin Art” in particular.
“Crypto Art” / “Bitcoin Art” is still more by and for crypto people at the moment, isn't it? Most collectors have a strong affinity to cryptos, but this group of collectors is generally still small and not very relevant in the art scene.
We don't even need to discuss the fact that blockchain has changed “digital art” forever. NFTs, Ordinals, everything around WEB3 is revolutionary and, in my opinion, still unrecognized. The legendary Beeple Drop in 2021 has certainly changed awareness, but unfortunately, in combination with the strong setback or bear market, it also left a stale taste that NFTs are a scam.
There are always well-known artists like Hirst and others who do something with NFTs, but the big breakthrough has yet to happen. This would require an alliance of galleries such as the Königsgallerie in New York and other large established galleries that are firmly committed to “art on the blockchain”. It's probably all a big process.
It's also important to remember that gallery and museum curators live in their bubble and have a particular view of art.... Not all physicals centered around Bitcoin and its ideology, history, characters, memes and so on will be considered here, although they will be considered worthy of attention from our perspective.
For sure CryptoArt has its spot in the history of art.... the process is ongoing and in the end an artwork is only that much worth, how much a buyer is ready to pay.