Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 1,328 results by Injust
I think I need to clarify myself. I'm not trying to clean a "sold" account's trust rating.
This account was never "sold". You gave me negative trust rating on my account because I bought another account with negative trust on it.
This account was never "sold". You gave me negative trust rating on my account because I bought another account with negative trust on it.
Again: "When you buy an account, you buy everything related to it". You bought jasonslow, thus buying its defaulted loans. I've also told you before that I'll not remove my negative.
I bought an account with negative trust. I didn't buy any responsibility for the previous owner's actions, nor am I liable for whatever the previous owner did.
When you buy an account, you buy everything related to it. I will not clean someone's trust rating just because the account was "sold".
I think I need to clarify myself. I'm not trying to clean a "sold" account's trust rating.
This account was never "sold". You gave me negative trust rating on my account because I bought another account with negative trust on it.
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
Wow, that's a completely new excuse never used by any scammer. /s
Get real.
That's why I'm asking for proof of my "scam" activity.
I have a fair amount of positive trust, as well.
You're missing the point. It's been proven that you have alts. There is no way to prove that you're not a multi-alt scammer just trying to resurrect one of your accounts by faking a "sale". Even if your story was true - tough shit, that's the risk you take buying accounts.
Even ignoring the above - as far as I can see your neg trust is factual. Your best hope is to work it out with via PM because posting this shit publicly is more likely to earn you another one.
About the multi-alt scammer thing.
I haven't even TRIED hiding my transactions.
Literally, ALL MY TRANSACTIONS are around the same 20 or so addresses, back and forth.
I've been entirely open about this.
Also, the account purchases were done with redsn0w as escrow, he would still have the PMs.
And yes, I have messaged him. Thanks for the advice again.
Is it not possible you sold the accounts to yourself? Others have gone through great lenghts to pull that off - I think that's the point he's trying to make.
I see what you mean. If it is indeed true, because I can't think of a way to prove that those weren't previously owned by me, then well, I have nothing to go on, I guess.
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
Wow, that's a completely new excuse never used by any scammer. /s
Get real.
That's why I'm asking for proof of my "scam" activity.
I have a fair amount of positive trust, as well.
You're missing the point. It's been proven that you have alts. There is no way to prove that you're not a multi-alt scammer just trying to resurrect one of your accounts by faking a "sale". Even if your story was true - tough shit, that's the risk you take buying accounts.
Even ignoring the above - as far as I can see your neg trust is factual. Your best hope is to work it out with via PM because posting this shit publicly is more likely to earn you another one.
About the multi-alt scammer thing.
I haven't even TRIED hiding my transactions.
Literally, ALL MY TRANSACTIONS are around the same 20 or so addresses, back and forth.
I've been entirely open about this.
Also, the account purchases were done with redsn0w as escrow, he would still have the PMs.
And yes, I have messaged him. And the 777Coin posts happened before I joined a signature campaign, or when I was in a signature campaign that didn't count posts in that board.
I never constantly posted in there for signature campaign, that's something I'd never do.
Thanks for the advice again.
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
Wow, that's a completely new excuse never used by any scammer. /s
Get real.
Quickseller gets what I'm talking about.
Thank you.
I'd just like to post in here, since most of the people giving me negative reputation seem to have done it after seeing this thread.
Exactly what evidence is there of me scamming?
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
For anybody who has openly (or in PM too) questioned me about purchasing accounts, I have never hid anything.
I'm not even active on my purchased accounts anymore.
All I ask, is for you to consider the evidence against me (which doesn't even exist) and consider removing your negative trust.
Also, like some other users have done, feel free to give me some neutral trust as a comment, noting that I am the owner of multiple accounts.
Again, I have always been open about the accounts that I own.
Thank you.
Exactly what evidence is there of me scamming?
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
For anybody who has openly (or in PM too) questioned me about purchasing accounts, I have never hid anything.
I'm not even active on my purchased accounts anymore.
All I ask, is for you to consider the evidence against me (which doesn't even exist) and consider removing your negative trust.
Also, like some other users have done, feel free to give me some neutral trust as a comment, noting that I am the owner of multiple accounts.
Again, I have always been open about the accounts that I own.
Thank you.
you have openly asked members to remove negative trust on your purchased accounts and questioned if they have proof of the scams. imagine how that feels to someone who has lost significant amounts of money to the accounts you have purchased.
I did that on the first account I purchased, not entirely realizing the consequences. The negative trust was indeed removed, because it was on a personal basis and not because of a scammer.
After realizing that I shouldn't do that when the negative trust rolled in, I haven't done that again.
But then, I'm not asking to remove the negative trust on my purchased account. Just this account.
I'm not even questioning the scams on those accounts. I never have asked for proof of those scams.
I only ask for proof of MY scams, because I never have, yet I am accused of being a scammer because I purchased accounts and asked the wrong questions.
For that, I apologize to those who were scammed by the accounts' previous owners. But labelling me as a scammer, please reconsider that.
you asked to remove the negative trust on a scammer account you supposedly bought and asked for evidence of the scams. negative trust was then applied to your account for this reason.
I never asked for evidence of the scams done by previous owners of accounts I purchased.
I'm asking for evidence of MY apparent scams.
Even in the negative trust left on my account, it has nothing to do with ME scamming.
"Injust purchased the account jasonslow (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=69911)."
"injust asked to remove my negative feedback, jasonslow still owes me 2 btc. account bought by a scammer."
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
Wow, that's a completely new excuse never used by any scammer. /s
Get real.
That's why I'm asking for proof of my "scam" activity.
I have a fair amount of positive trust, as well.
I don't think I'm making myself clear.
I bought accounts with negative reputation. Until then, I only had positive reputation on this account.
I haven't scammed on this account. I haven't scammed on accounts I purchased.
Yet I'm labelled as a scammer, and nobody can bring forward even questionable, never mind solid, proof.
I'd just like to post in here, since most of the people giving me negative reputation seem to have done it after seeing this thread.
Exactly what evidence is there of me scamming?
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
For anybody who has openly (or in PM too) questioned me about purchasing accounts, I have never hid anything.
I'm not even active on my purchased accounts anymore.
All I ask, is for you to consider the evidence against me (which doesn't even exist) and consider removing your negative trust.
Also, like some other users have done, feel free to give me some neutral trust as a comment, noting that I am the owner of multiple accounts.
Again, I have always been open about the accounts that I own.
Thank you.
Exactly what evidence is there of me scamming?
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
For anybody who has openly (or in PM too) questioned me about purchasing accounts, I have never hid anything.
I'm not even active on my purchased accounts anymore.
All I ask, is for you to consider the evidence against me (which doesn't even exist) and consider removing your negative trust.
Also, like some other users have done, feel free to give me some neutral trust as a comment, noting that I am the owner of multiple accounts.
Again, I have always been open about the accounts that I own.
Thank you.
you have openly asked members to remove negative trust on your purchased accounts and questioned if they have proof of the scams. imagine how that feels to someone who has lost significant amounts of money to the accounts you have purchased.
I did that on the first account I purchased, not entirely realizing the consequences. The negative trust was indeed removed, because it was on a personal basis and not because of a scammer.
After realizing that I shouldn't do that when the negative trust rolled in, I haven't done that again.
But then, I'm not asking to remove the negative trust on my purchased account. Just this account.
I'm not even questioning the scams on those accounts. I never have asked for proof of those scams.
I only ask for proof of MY scams, because I never have, yet I am accused of being a scammer because I purchased accounts and asked the wrong questions.
For that, I apologize to those who were scammed by the accounts' previous owners. But labelling me as a scammer, please reconsider that.
I'd just like to post in here, since most of the people giving me negative reputation seem to have done it after seeing this thread.
Exactly what evidence is there of me scamming?
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
For anybody who has openly (or in PM too) questioned me about purchasing accounts, I have never hid anything.
I'm not even active on my purchased accounts anymore.
All I ask, is for you to consider the evidence against me (which doesn't even exist) and consider removing your negative trust.
Also, like some other users have done, feel free to give me some neutral trust as a comment, noting that I am the owner of multiple accounts.
Again, I have always been open about the accounts that I own.
Thank you.
Exactly what evidence is there of me scamming?
I have bought a negative-repped account. I have not scammed.
For anybody who has openly (or in PM too) questioned me about purchasing accounts, I have never hid anything.
I'm not even active on my purchased accounts anymore.
All I ask, is for you to consider the evidence against me (which doesn't even exist) and consider removing your negative trust.
Also, like some other users have done, feel free to give me some neutral trust as a comment, noting that I am the owner of multiple accounts.
Again, I have always been open about the accounts that I own.
Thank you.
Re: [LONTONG SAYUR Giveway] - Answer & Win total 0.1 - CHAMPION
https://twitter.com/sid_itachi
39RRBjy1Dr6bFgComopyHkxfNXLRDtKbFL
Answer:
1. ~p
2.
HTML:
| Name | price |
| card | $ 1 |
| diamond | $ 1000 |
| tie | $ 50 |
SQL:
CREATE TABLE new(Name text, price text);
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('card','$ 1');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('diamond','$ 1000');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('tie','$ 50');
SELECT * FROM new
3. Crash Bash
4. Sudoku invented by Howard Garns
HMMMM...that answer certainly looks similar to something I've seen before, doesn't it?
It's called smart work if the code works.
Which it doesn't.
Re: [LONTONG SAYUR Giveway] - Answer & Win total 0.1 - CHAMPION
https://twitter.com/sid_itachi
39RRBjy1Dr6bFgComopyHkxfNXLRDtKbFL
Answer:
1. ~p
2.
HTML:
| Name | price |
| card | $ 1 |
| diamond | $ 1000 |
| tie | $ 50 |
SQL:
CREATE TABLE new(Name text, price text);
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('card','$ 1');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('diamond','$ 1000');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('tie','$ 50');
SELECT * FROM new
3. Crash Bash
4. Sudoku invented by Howard Garns
HMMMM...that answer certainly looks similar to something I've seen before, doesn't it?
Re: [LONTONG SAYUR Giveway] - Answer & Win total 0.1 - CHAMPION
https://twitter.com/Injustsu
1NJUSTv7ikwJ33J6D8HLfAv1jz325BfnF9
Answer:
1. p
2.
HTML
HTML
SQL
CREATE TABLE Costs(`Name` text, `price` text);
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('card','$ 1');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('diamond','$ 1000');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('tie','$ 50');
SELECT * FROM Costs;
SQL
3. Crash Bash
4. Sudoku, Howard Garns
1NJUSTv7ikwJ33J6D8HLfAv1jz325BfnF9
Answer:
1. p
2.
HTML
| Name | price |
| card | $ 1 |
| diamond | $ 1000 |
| tie | $ 50 |
HTML
SQL
CREATE TABLE Costs(`Name` text, `price` text);
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('card','$ 1');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('diamond','$ 1000');
INSERT INTO Costs (Name, price)
VALUES ('tie','$ 50');
SELECT * FROM Costs;
SQL
3. Crash Bash
4. Sudoku, Howard Garns
Re: [LONTONG SAYUR Giveway] - Answer & Win total 0.1 - Level : HARD
https://twitter.com/Injustsu
1NJUSTv7ikwJ33J6D8HLfAv1jz325BfnF9
Answer:
1. 35 days
2. 24 years old
3. 25 four-sided figures
4. Deoxyribo nucleic acid
5. 13.3% recurring (2/15)
1NJUSTv7ikwJ33J6D8HLfAv1jz325BfnF9
Answer:
1. 35 days
2. 24 years old
3. 25 four-sided figures
4. Deoxyribo nucleic acid
5. 13.3% recurring (2/15)
Re: [LONTONG SAYUR Giveway] - Answer & Win total 0.1 - Level : Intermediate
https://twitter.com/Injustsu
1NJUSTv7ikwJ33J6D8HLfAv1jz325BfnF9
Answer:
1. They weigh the same
2. Robert Oppenheimer
3. Sunday & Thursday
4. Hydrogen dioxide
5. 135/11
1NJUSTv7ikwJ33J6D8HLfAv1jz325BfnF9
Answer:
1. They weigh the same
2. Robert Oppenheimer
3. Sunday & Thursday
4. Hydrogen dioxide
5. 135/11
The file that is available for download has some interesting metadata.
File description: Jolanta6
Product name: Phocaceous8
Language: Bulgarian (Bulgaria)
Original filename: Qaplus.exe
EDIT: More metadata
TRANSLATION 0x0402 0x04b0
INTERNALNAME Qaplus
FILEVERSION 1.00
COMPANYNAME Astonsoft Ltd.
COMMENTS Oxyuriasis
PRODUCTNAME Phocaceous8
PRODUCTVERSION 1.00
FILEDESCRIPTION Jolanta6
ORIGINALFILENAME Qaplus.exe
File description: Jolanta6
Product name: Phocaceous8
Language: Bulgarian (Bulgaria)
Original filename: Qaplus.exe
EDIT: More metadata
TRANSLATION 0x0402 0x04b0
INTERNALNAME Qaplus
FILEVERSION 1.00
COMPANYNAME Astonsoft Ltd.
COMMENTS Oxyuriasis
PRODUCTNAME Phocaceous8
PRODUCTVERSION 1.00
FILEDESCRIPTION Jolanta6
ORIGINALFILENAME Qaplus.exe
So how did you get to the file? Have you entered the site? Or you used some other way to scan the file?
Downloaded the file and ran it sandboxed. It's a nasty piece of work.
Runs a process disguised as scvhost.exe.
Also copies itself to several places in your user profile.
It corrupts the Computer Management shortcut in the Start Menu too.
Nasty piece of shit.