Search content
Sort by

Showing 9 of 9 results by InspireTTK
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 21/01/2018, 00:54:56 UTC
And that is why they created and planted Bitcoin as a surreptitious creative destruction of the nation-state central banking system with the USD as the reserve
This just doesn't make sense to me. Who is They. If They are elites that's controlling the human population, making bitcoin just don't make sense because they can't control it fully, and from bitcoin so many other coins have been created that's even more private and secure. I think you're assuming too much here. I believe bitcoin was created by someone that was sick of the corrupted financial system, and wants to great something that can free people from it.
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 20/01/2018, 02:25:45 UTC
Or it could be like the peak in April 2013 and the drop from $214 to $64, then rise to $1200 months after:
I think the Futures Exchange opening up, the bull up was massive. Now Dollars can Short bitcoin. I think there's going to be more Shorts of bitcoin in the Futures market. It will keep pushing bitcoin down for a period of time. When Lightning starts to get massive adoption, the new bitcoin boom will start. The Futures Traders that short will get squeezed out, transfer of wealth will go away from them and into bitcoin holders, and the next boom starts. End of this year looks like a good time as any, but can even go into next year.

I hear rumours that Wordpress will soon be able to accept bitcoin using Lightning, that's going to be a huge technology that will increase bitcoin usage.
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 19/01/2018, 02:43:53 UTC
Price looks like same as when it peaked at 1k back in the days a couple of years ago. Same pattern. We will go down, down, down, steady out, then one day up, up, up and another boom.

Just compare the 1k peak with the 20k peak. The only difference will be the time, but pattern seems to be the same.
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 16/01/2018, 01:40:39 UTC
Can anyone explain today's Armstrong s posts on euro?
Europe's Central Bank is not printing money anymore and giving it to the Governments. This decrease in money supply will cause interest rates to go up because there's still demand from Governments to borrow money. Short term this will increase interest rates and will attract investments. However, if interest rates go up too much, it's going to destroy the economic confidence, and things go down hill. All this info is not 100% correct, just summarised points in my interpretation.
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 14/01/2018, 02:51:09 UTC
Quote
I saw those videos, and more. Did you see that Marshal put that Teacher in handcuffs and forcing her out the door? Hardcore. They ended up not pressing charges (because they have no grounds). I think they're abusing their powers when somebody speaks out and they want to shut them up. It's uncalled for. You can see in their actions they're corrupted.
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 12/01/2018, 04:06:38 UTC
Correlation is not causation. Notice he doesn't predict the specific event that correlated to a turn date on his cyclical models.
He predicts dates, and sees what happens when those dates come. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/understanding-cycles/did-the-economic-confidence-model-pick-the-trump-tax-reform/

Quote
If his model really works, he should be abundantly wealthy already. Advancing the known science would be the next logical goal for someone who claims to value humanity so much.
I'm sure he's wealthy. He's not in it to be mega rich, he's here to help the world. He states that many times on his blog https://www.armstrongeconomics.com

Quote
But I'm not convinced that he has invented any new science. But I'm not accusing him of not. I'm just saying I will be skeptical until Armstrong explains his work in technical terms, not just glossing over the details to convince laymen.
He hasn't invented any science. All he saw was that everything has patterns, and it's related to Pi. That's his break through. One of his latest focus is the global cooling, which it's looking correct. Martin Armstrong is a genius for finding the pattern (in my opinion)
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 11/01/2018, 03:04:59 UTC
Btw, I had some private discussions about Armstrong recently. And the gist of it, is that I think perhaps Armstrong is applying the scientific method of building cause & effect hypothesis via his stochastic and pattern modeling of events in time, but it's disconcerning that he doesn't open source nor publish any of his work in sufficient technological detail such that real peer review could be done.
So it's possible Armstrong is a con artist, although his extensive knowledge of history and the full body of evidence, causes me to take him somewhat seriously. Yet I also remain skeptical.
He is applying his Pi model on the timing of whatever he follows. I don't exactly know how it works, but everything has patterns, and it's related to Pi.

Why would he open source his work for? That's his livelihood. He makes money with his work. You can access his data at a monthly cost, he provides that as a service. How is he a con artist, and con artist for what?

You can be skeptical, but when you state it's possible he is a con artist, give links to verify your claims.
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 07/01/2018, 03:20:30 UTC
Everything you need is available on his website. Start with 'Its Just Time'
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/its-just-time-martin-armstrong.pdf
Thanks for that link! Awesome material. Do you have any more? I've only been following his blog, which is very refreshing.
Post
Topic
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
InspireTTK
on 23/12/2017, 07:55:53 UTC
Did anyone read the blog BitCoin Crash Dec 22, 2017?
It's a Q and A. It says Socrates called the high in bitcoin. Anyone subscribed to socrates and can verify?