I read all of Hal's posts and one of them really caught my attention. On January 15, 2010, he suggested to raise bitcoins to send Satoshi to the Financial Cryptography conference. Right after, one of the participants said that Satoshi would hardly accept because he wanted to remain anonymous. This was obvious to everyone on the forum. Why would Hal suggest this? He was an experient cypherpunk who communicated with Satoshi in early days of the project, and obviously knew that Satoshi was a pseudonym. This sounds really strange.
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: FBI's recent response to the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto
by
JCCN11
on 17/08/2024, 19:49:09 UTC
I also believe Nick Szabo was the leader, but Hal Finney was also involved. His neighbor was called Satoshi Nakamoto, it's such a coincidence!
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Nenolod, the guy that wants to prove Bitcoin doesn't work.