You should run the cuda 11.5 build for the best speed.
hashrate bugs in 1.28
When a solution was found, it exited the solver immediately without scanning the whole range of nonces, but the full hashrate was added. This is caused a inflated hashrate. Worse on on low difficulty. An index bug sometimes caused hash to be added to the wrong gpu, so if you run with a good gpu and a poor gpu in the rig, the poor gpu's hashrate could be inflated.
In 1.29 we don't send shares to the pool if the diff hash changed. On a vardiff pools (p2p style) or simulator pools this might reduce the hashrate, but we did it to reduce rejected shares on real pools like Nicehash.
in v1.36 we have increased the number of samples in the average hashrate, so you should run for a longer period of time. We reduced the default intensity to reduce the stale shares.
Poolside the cuda_11_5 1.36 should be better, but the defaults might not.
f.ex for AMD cards --xintensity 512 is pretty good on 2miners.com . Much better than 24.
I see, so the reported hashrate should now be more accurate, right? However, why does the latest version show higher hashrate in the beginning and then it drops?
Post
Topic
BoardMining (Altcoins)
Re: Team Black Miner (Ethereum Ethereum classic Vertcoin Zilliqa 0.5% fee)LHR unlock
Changing pool and increasing the intensity will increase the poolside speed. This miner is a staleshare miner. It's by design. In 1.36 we have identified and fixed a couple of buffer errors that could cause crashes. The AMD kernel has been rewritten and optimized. Will release soon.
I have been using miningpoolhub with high intensity, but seems like pool hashrate has been lower with versions since the timeout bug occurred.
Post
Topic
BoardMining (Altcoins)
Re: Team Black Miner (Ethereum, Ethereum classic, Vertcoin, Zilliqa+dual 0.5% fee)
Actually, Claymore, please don't release it too soon, probably not until other people start to significantly improve Sol/s. Now we are making a pretty decent profit without torturing our GPUs, and if you keep your miner to yourself you can make a really good profit with your own GPUs. Please don't put being a heater as a requirement to be a miner for our rigs too soon, thank you
Big farm operator using paid for miner? Scared you gonna lose a little profit once Claymore releases his miner? Lol!
Yeah, but at least I don't see the network hashrate and difficulty booming, it's even a bit below the slow launch linear increase. In very short term (like one day or so)a public good miner probably can boost us who watch over this thread all the time, also may cause price fluctuation. Maybe in long term, a good miner might provide some price support impact. Anyway, I don't see much reason to jump into high power consumption this early.
Actually, Claymore, please don't release it too soon, probably not until other people start to significantly improve Sol/s. Now we are making a pretty decent profit without torturing our GPUs, and if you keep your miner to yourself you can make a really good profit with your own GPUs. Please don't put being a heater as a requirement to be a miner for our rigs too soon, thank you