It's a exchange , they will charge something , I mean its impossible like them to give you same value with 1 ETH ( actually 340 $ ).

bro , they have lowest fees than others exchanges , and also you do not need to be verified with ID or other documents , if you go on kraken or other trading site you will need to be first time verified if you want to exchange crypto to USD

What are the differences from other ICOs???

Is MineBig really not finding any Aiden blocks, or is it just not updating?

It's back up.

N Factor changes tomorrow, correct? Maybe in some time zones this has happened already?

More on this please. Someone smart speculate what running an Xnode would bring in daily coinwise.

Is there more info to dirtydiggers? What are the "low fees"? How often are we paid, as blocks are found?

Thanks!

Bigger logo (lunch is late being delivered):

http://i.imgur.com/qypdtoV.jpg?1

Filthy, you asked for this yesterday on page 668

http://i.imgur.com/i6GYdPv.jpg?1

Let me know if you want anything tweaked.

Go ahead and submit. If you need it smaller or cropped, just let me know (I can supply the PSD as well if needed).

My XC address:
XDp8cyLKByuJdUnrmB8phaypSVu2v3LCaU

I've been looking, but I probably don't know the correct terms. Is there a way to convert the current UTC Net Hashrate and Difficulty to "scrypt" numbers?

I've been mining on cryptotrain for a while now and every now and then I switch to direct UTC pool mining, just to compare numbers which have always been pretty close (need to mine on cryptotrain for 3+ days to get full results).

But now since I updated to AMD 14.4 drivers (which do increase speed and lower temps for X11 at least) I get nothing but hardware errors from my old configs. I had used the config generator to set me up and everything was working correctly. Now I get tons of HW errors. Any experiencing the same or have working 280x settings they can share once on 14.4?

Thanks!

Voted!

Anyone else having an issue with "adn.minebig.com". I haven't been able to connect since yesterday, but my hashes are being accepted.

barbados-fs, you're welcome. Here's the link to the download for lasybear's X11 and X13 mods, tho is seems you are getting almost identical results with whatever you are using.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623409.0

nanoprobe, every card is different. I find it extremely frustrating not being able to get mine as high as other show. Every now and then I get a little higher than what posted and it's party time

Here's a few things I've learned:
- If Thread Concurrency is 8192 (or whatever) try 8193 and 8191
- Try 128 and 256 work size
- Sometimes lowering your GPU engine can actually improve speed, try in increments of 25
- Stable and slower is better than super fast and "dead" in the morning when you wake up

These are my settings using lasybear's X11 mod kernel. I beleive the cards can be pushed a little harder, but I have no HW errors with these.

280x - 3.4MH (MSI)
sgminer.exe --kernel x11mod -I 16 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-threads 2 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500 --queue 0 --expiry 1 --scan-time 1 --no-submit-stale --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-overheat 85 --auto-fan -o stratum+tcp://......

270x - 1.9MH (Sapphire)
sgminer --kernel x11mod -I 16 --thread-concurrency 8192 -w 128 -g 2 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1400 --queue 5 --expiry 30 --scan-time 30 --no-submit-stale --temp-cutoff 85 --temp-overheat 80 --auto-fan -o stratum+tcp://.......

I just switched to CryptoTrain using lasybear's X11 mods:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623409.0

I have not had a chance yet to compare them to LTC Rabbit, but I am seeing 3.3/mh - 280x and 1.9/mh - 270x. I am not pushing the cards as hard as I can yet, I'm just testing stability.

Hi all! Small time miner. Long time listener, first time caller.

Two things, can we get this wallet syncing (so Staking) guide by inmymem added to the user guides?
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/274lt5/wallet_syncing_issue_resolution/

I can get it into a PDF if that will help.

And tho I work in code (AS3), I do not have the skills to even attempt to help with the testing. But what I find interesting is that it would seem that since there are not many transactions (yet), the addresses can be found by scouring the blockchain for specific transactions, correct? That being said, since no one has been able to post proof, that even WITH the correct address, it seems to be impossible to work backwards and submit proof. Let me know if my logic is unsound, but one would think that with the answer, finding the problem would not be that hard. (Oh right, "42".)

Anyways, not too shabby considering we're not where Altsecure sees us yet.