I finally finished reading through this thread, and on the surface, I thought that there might have had been some kind of potentially interesting points in regards to the use of text colors in the forum, and/or other aspects related to posting style - yet largely, Op did not raise any real interesting or meaningful points, and even his poll questions are a bit stupid (retarded) and/or incomplete.



I am surely not neutral on the topic of forum members being able to post in colors, since personally it seems that being able to add colors can potentially help to emphasize or de-emphasize certain ideas contained within any post... yet at the same time, there is likely a bit of value in judiciousness rather than just having your posts in some other chosen color of the day for seemingly random and arbitrary reasons..or maybe ONLY reasons known to OP that still get back to the idea of attempts at attention whoring rather than sharing of actual significant and/or meaningful substance.



Surely as many other members have already mentioned in this thread, OP seems to merely want to get attention and does not really have much if anything to say with his font color choices, which also have already been pointed out to be both colorful and also screaming with BOLD.. and surely OP specifically fails/refuses to recognize and/or appreciate his own seemingly non-substantive desires for attention over meaningless and unimportant points which goes to trolling, distractions and noise rather than providing any kind of meaningful and substantive contributions to the forum.



I am not going to claim to have had read all (or even any.. from the substance of OP's posts in this thread and without even reading any of OP's historical posts, I am having some trouble imagining that there is any value in OP's historical posts) of OP's historical posts, and I doubt that it is even necessary to go through such a likely painful experience, since I merely became acquainted with OP through this thread, and I already saw enough of his boring repetitive drolling to realize that his desires to use varying font colors while bolding such text is not really helpful to anyone (perhaps not even helpful to himself), except to show him as a bit of an uninteresting nuisance.. and likely either immature, disingenuine (in terms of purposefully wanting to distract from topics, which is also known as trolling) or mentally instable as others have already mentioned aspects of these ideas and/or assessments of OP's character.. which surely is NOT likely too central to OP's stated purpose of this thread, but his own style ends up unnecessarily drawing attention to his character rather than really allowing some kind of meaningful exploration of potential upsides to using color and style within the font choices of posts.

Naturally, too much of anything can be very problematic, I only support appropriate usage of the color text without abusing it such a way it will not become irritating in the eyes of the reader, I think text are meant to be used in marking an a vital and important note that should get the reader attention easily as regards to how much the text is to the poster, below is one user color texting pattern I admires so much.


You can see how important and vital the colored text can be to those it is relating to.

The problem with stake campaign is that they don't want to hire someone for managing their campaign. I have tried to reach them (I won't lie lol) but failed. They have hired some spammers in the campaign (not everyone). They don't give priority to quality, they only need quantity.

They must hire someone for managing the campaign. Or at least to monitor the participants and replacing the spammer. Don't know if they ever will decide to do so. I would gladly assist them if they would look for a campaign manager or at least an assistant for monitoring the participants but seems that's not going to happen anytime soon.

To have 0 house edge on red/black, the multiplier would have to be 15/7, or 2.142857... which we truncate to 2.14 since it's an irrational number. Soon we'll increase the floating point precision of this value to make it closer to 0% house edge.
To have 0 house edge on green, the multiplier is 15/1 = 15x, which we don't have to truncate and therefore all green bets will have an exactly 0% house edge.

There will be no fun of the game if they remove the zero/monk payout from the roulette. The real zero HE game can also be with the special zero/monk payout. However, the HE is approximately 0.1% for their roulette game with MONK currency. Contribution to the expected return amount for 1 to 7, 8 to 14 and special monk/zero is respectively (7 ÷ 15) × 2.14, (7 ÷ 15) × 2.14 and (1 ÷ 15) × 15.

• Total expected return is: (7 ÷ 15) × 2.14 + (7 ÷ 15) × 2.14 + (1 ÷ 15) × 15 = 2.99733
• So, the HE is: [1 - (2.99733 ÷ 3)] × 100% = 0.089%

The HE is 6.67% for a bit lower payout of all outcomes in other crypto. @monkgg, The HE isn't really 0% in MONK token for the roulette game. Have I missed anything on the calculation?

I voted that it is acceptable, especially if it is to insult fucking scammers, liars and cowards like the OP, who couldn't make the thread self-moderate in this section simply because in this section the option is not available. Otherwise he would have created a cowardly thread of his own in this section as he has done in others.

If you play in the MONK currency, then the payout is on red or black with odds of 2.14, and on green Monk (zero) with odds of 15, and then the house edge is 0%.
If it is played in all other currencies, then the payout is on red or black with odds of 2, and on green Monk with odds of 14 and then the house edge is 6.67%

Okay, you have a roulette with these odds if someone plays with $MONK, nice. By the way, what about to add a roulette without ZERO? With only black and red pockets, for $MONK players. I think it will be nice if you have roulette with no zero, with one zero and with two zeros, all of them with 0% house edge for $MONK players. It would attract people, wouldn't it? At least I would try it

Roulette with only black and red pockets is the one with 0% house edge. One green zero already changes the house edge of the game (2.7%), two green zeros increase the house edge further (5.26%).

You will loss your bet, because the green Monk is a different outcome. There are 3 betting range in their roulette game. Those are red (1-7 number), black (8-14 number) and Green (Monk). In every round, one range will be chosen as the winner and other two will be losing bet.