Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 22 results by Jamus
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
unfortunately the market is only 10% distributed, so by the time 100% is out, which is rather soon, we will be way over priced at 40mill market cap, we need s new exchange, one with liquidity, no one can trade on the current exchange.. price jumps around wildly
Re: [ANN] NeosCoin Official BCT Thread. Details, news and other information.
ah okay, will you fund my project? i cant tell you what it is or when it will be ready, or give you updates, but fund it. most unprofessional approach.
The roadmap and upcoming features have been posted already. How can you make the comments you've been making? I'd feel pretty ridiculous.
progress? links? where
Re: [ANN] NeosCoin Official BCT Thread. Details, news and other information.
ah okay, will you fund my project? i cant tell you what it is or when it will be ready, or give you updates, but fund it. most unprofessional approach.
Re: [ANN] NeosCoin Official BCT Thread. Details, news and other information.
ah okay so its kind of like a mystery bet on the races, you are coding but no one knows what or when, you could be coding a delete all coins button, who cares your coding eh. great for investors, sorry to say bud but there is no real world use of neos, all you have investetors.. and right now your purposely dropping the coin so you can accumulate at a low price then release updates once your done accumulating.
weekly updates? nah we just have to take your word for it eh, real professional.
weekly updates? nah we just have to take your word for it eh, real professional.
Re: [ANN] NeosCoin Official BCT Thread. Details, news and other information.
well whats next then? roadmap? future.. you guys just had a second ico based on hype, oh thats right you forked it with a shit load of premine, hyping about a new chain, now not a word
how long until we know, theres a big question mark on development, is it days? months? years?
whats happening? you need a clear plan ahead, make a roadmap with variable dates, its okay if you blow your dates out by a bit.
how long until we know, theres a big question mark on development, is it days? months? years?
whats happening? you need a clear plan ahead, make a roadmap with variable dates, its okay if you blow your dates out by a bit.
Re: [ANN] NeosCoin Official BCT Thread. Details, news and other information.
i noticed you have been focused on trading lately. do you have a breakdown of where crowdsale dunds have ben alocated? other than used for a trading fund? have you hired additional developers, i noted alot of hype before crowdsale, to quiet down now is kind of cheating investors, you may feel similar about antshares. do good by your investors and you will build a reputation for being genuine.
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
announcement
encase no one noticed there is no actual illiquidity in this market, over the past 3 weeks a whale has accumulated over 25% of the market, ~150btc worth, i was watching the distribution list closeley.
now he will place a large buy wall so inexperienced traders buy his sells at a 150% premium
once the bags empty, buy walls pulled, market returns to an illiquid market with 1btc per day trading volume.
quote me on this in a week
encase no one noticed there is no actual illiquidity in this market, over the past 3 weeks a whale has accumulated over 25% of the market, ~150btc worth, i was watching the distribution list closeley.
now he will place a large buy wall so inexperienced traders buy his sells at a 150% premium
once the bags empty, buy walls pulled, market returns to an illiquid market with 1btc per day trading volume.
quote me on this in a week
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
is it true that this was 3 previous failed projects before it was renamed zcoin? and thats why the founder left? and still holds a founders wallet? with a huge stockpile of XZC, how do we know he is not going to dump?
no development for weeks.... no updates.. no formal roadmap..
no development for weeks.... no updates.. no formal roadmap..
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
the problem here is that the coin has split into two forks, no one so theres 2 chains, big fuckup really.
and there seems to be hardly no market liquidity, only one person trading it, he places a large buy wall it pumps slightly then drops back to 50k or lower when he removes it.
not to mention the 8k new coins being produced.
and there seems to be hardly no market liquidity, only one person trading it, he places a large buy wall it pumps slightly then drops back to 50k or lower when he removes it.
not to mention the 8k new coins being produced.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
this wallet runs mint, so according to the whiteoaper this is an entire platform.. dev has been busy indeed, im guessing he is cooking up something now
this will be an add for polo, completely new chain and platform, first coin to use a directed acyclic graph instead of a blockchain.
are there plans to put the platforms trustless exchange in-wallet?
will there eventually be gui to create smart contracts?
this will be an add for polo, completely new chain and platform, first coin to use a directed acyclic graph instead of a blockchain.
are there plans to put the platforms trustless exchange in-wallet?
will there eventually be gui to create smart contracts?
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
so is it a myth that byteballs is anon?
Is this a new tune of dissatisfacted guy, after distribution concerns were not readily accepted?
Could you be more specific or use full English words at least?
This expression - "byteballs is anon" doesn't sound too descriptive. Basically, yes "byteballs" != "anon". Even the number of letters is different
But what do you mean?
anonymous, for shady transactions, like monero and zcash
ive heard an attacker is able to source your IP as its peer to peer.
its a little deceptive from reading the ann.
yeah im a little dissatisfied, im allowed to share my concerns, we cant all love in happy unicorn shill land.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
what a completely unfair distribution.. its going to be a dump fest from now till next distribution.. and then after a fresh batch of people get distrubted another 50%.. another dump fest.. best time to buy would be around march. but even then still another 9x the current amount to be distributed.
dump fest.price is rising. aint nobody dumping their balls.
well lets do some simple math.
ICONOMI - one of the linked addresses to receive byteballs.
ICONOMI linked 70k btc - giving them 9.766% of the total supply by the time all distribution is over.
so they currently own 9766 byteballs = 245btc = $221,446 US dollars.
mid feb is the next round. they enter the 70k BTC once again, and in turn earn another 9766 Byteballs
assuming the price stays the same =
ICONOMI will own over 2.2million dollars USD or 10% of a currency.
one single entity owns 10% vs the other 7billion people on earth.
and that is just ICONOMI.. not to mention the other people that own large percentage.. LISK etc.
how is this fair, your giving a small portion of about 10 people 95% of the supply.
your project is already set up to fail, another project will take its place with a clone of byteballs with a fair distribution, excellent idea, failed distribution method, logic = lets give millionaires massive portions of the supply.
How is this fair? How is it in the real world, yet you are transacting with currencies? You think on your national economy that 1% or less of the population does not control the 90% of money supply? That 1 person can not crash your average western european countries economy? LOL. And extended to world economy, 150 people can move as much capital as the next 6billion combined.
If you are dealing with money, if you are buying and selling goods, you are contributing to inequality and unfair unjust world. Each transaction you make, and every one else makes with anything of value, is contributing to inequality. Rich get richer and poor get poorer, its not a dumb cliche its a realization of facts builtin any economical system. If you like to try alternatives go to Venezuela.
Can you point to any economy in the real world in any historical point in time where distribution is equal and is over time equalizing? LOL.
Money is the root of all evil, it is designed not to be equal and fair, any monetary system which goes against this basic truth fails and people dont consider it valuable to transact with.
Life is unfair, deal with it. I got my 1gb from 1btc, and bought more with the same 1btc, now I have +40GB. Now I am 1000001.23% richer than all the 99.9% of people of planet earth who didnt know how to buy a btc and sign a message with their wallet, those who still have 0gb. Unfair to them? Iconomi is looking down on my 40gb from their stash of their 9138312gb, so what?
What would you suggest would be a better distribution method? How would you do your byteball clone to be fair?
how would i make my clone different? max of 10btc linked. fair. now its averaged against everyone somewhat equally, not 1 entity has 100000x times more than every other person, ready waiting to dump the market with over $250,000 usd worth.
i think with such a new approach, why set up for failure, is this method the absolute fairest and best method the developer could think of? or am i missing something?
its the equivalent of having 1000 people stuck on an island and finding a load of 500 apples, and saying ok lets give 4 people 448 of those apples, and the remaining 996 people will have to share 2 apples. its actually cringe worthy how they think this was ever fair, its setup the market for failure, this will continue to be a topic of weakness throughout the coins life.
Dont worry, if the method of distribution was magically fair, somehow from a real helicopter drone dropped bytes to Yemeni people equally as to rich Germans, you would still find something to complain about for the coins life, did the helicopters pollute the environment too much and scare the bird-life? Discuss.
Lisk aren't about to split there 7000 btc into 700 separate addresses.
10btc max would make it a whole lot fairer. people owning larger amounts is fine, but people owning 10% is a little overboard. whats the logic, they rich so lets make em richer?
lets go distribute free lambo's, but only give them to people who already own lambo's.. and the people who drive a 1985 ford only get a lambo valve cap.
Just like that waves (or whatever dumb crypto pseudo company) guy said they would distribute their received bytes among their customers, and then a day later said "lol no we will give them btc 'tokens'".
Your way of thinking with your island analogy, 1000 apples in a basket arrive and their owner says "will give 1 apple for 1 piece of paper 1cm in square size", and you assume the guy holding a large sheet of paper several meters in size wont have a scissors to cut his big-sheet into smaller pieces to receive more apples instead of 10? Yeah, that distribution method you have is ingenious, if only there was other geniuses like you in the world to think of this before!
no.. my idea was something thought up in about 3 seconds, its not an alternative method.
there has to be a fairer distribution method. the current method is ridiculous, and whatever anyone writes you will argue against because thats your personality. so ill stop there.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
what a completely unfair distribution.. its going to be a dump fest from now till next distribution.. and then after a fresh batch of people get distrubted another 50%.. another dump fest.. best time to buy would be around march. but even then still another 9x the current amount to be distributed.
dump fest.price is rising. aint nobody dumping their balls.
well lets do some simple math.
ICONOMI - one of the linked addresses to receive byteballs.
ICONOMI linked 70k btc - giving them 9.766% of the total supply by the time all distribution is over.
so they currently own 9766 byteballs = 245btc = $221,446 US dollars.
mid feb is the next round. they enter the 70k BTC once again, and in turn earn another 9766 Byteballs
assuming the price stays the same =
ICONOMI will own over 2.2million dollars USD or 10% of a currency.
one single entity owns 10% vs the other 7billion people on earth.
and that is just ICONOMI.. not to mention the other people that own large percentage.. LISK etc.
how is this fair, your giving a small portion of about 10 people 95% of the supply.
your project is already set up to fail, another project will take its place with a clone of byteballs with a fair distribution, excellent idea, failed distribution method, logic = lets give millionaires massive portions of the supply.
How is this fair? How is it in the real world, yet you are transacting with currencies? You think on your national economy that 1% or less of the population does not control the 90% of money supply? That 1 person can not crash your average western european countries economy? LOL. And extended to world economy, 150 people can move as much capital as the next 6billion combined.
If you are dealing with money, if you are buying and selling goods, you are contributing to inequality and unfair unjust world. Each transaction you make, and every one else makes with anything of value, is contributing to inequality. Rich get richer and poor get poorer, its not a dumb cliche its a realization of facts builtin any economical system. If you like to try alternatives go to Venezuela.
Can you point to any economy in the real world in any historical point in time where distribution is equal and is over time equalizing? LOL.
Money is the root of all evil, it is designed not to be equal and fair, any monetary system which goes against this basic truth fails and people dont consider it valuable to transact with.
Life is unfair, deal with it. I got my 1gb from 1btc, and bought more with the same 1btc, now I have +40GB. Now I am 1000001.23% richer than all the 99.9% of people of planet earth who didnt know how to buy a btc and sign a message with their wallet, those who still have 0gb. Unfair to them? Iconomi is looking down on my 40gb from their stash of their 9138312gb, so what?
What would you suggest would be a better distribution method? How would you do your byteball clone to be fair?
how would i make my clone different? max of 10btc linked. fair. now its averaged against everyone somewhat equally, not 1 entity has 100000x times more than every other person, ready waiting to dump the market with over $250,000 usd worth.
i think with such a new approach, why set up for failure, is this method the absolute fairest and best method the developer could think of? or am i missing something?
its the equivalent of having 1000 people stuck on an island and finding a load of 500 apples, and saying ok lets give 4 people 448 of those apples, and the remaining 996 people will have to share 2 apples. its actually cringe worthy how they think this was ever fair, its setup the market for failure, this will continue to be a topic of weakness throughout the coins life.
Dont worry, if the method of distribution was magically fair, somehow from a real helicopter drone dropped bytes to Yemeni people equally as to rich Germans, you would still find something to complain about for the coins life, did the helicopters pollute the environment too much and scare the bird-life? Discuss.
Lisk aren't about to split there 7000 btc into 700 separate addresses.
10btc max would make it a whole lot fairer. people owning larger amounts is fine, but people owning 10% is a little overboard. whats the logic, they rich so lets make em richer?
lets go distribute free lambo's, but only give them to people who already own lambo's.. and the people who drive a 1985 ford only get a lambo valve cap.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
what a completely unfair distribution.. its going to be a dump fest from now till next distribution.. and then after a fresh batch of people get distrubted another 50%.. another dump fest.. best time to buy would be around march. but even then still another 9x the current amount to be distributed.
dump fest.price is rising. aint nobody dumping their balls.
well lets do some simple math.
ICONOMI - one of the linked addresses to receive byteballs.
ICONOMI linked 70k btc - giving them 9.766% of the total supply by the time all distribution is over.
so they currently own 9766 byteballs = 245btc = $221,446 US dollars.
mid feb is the next round. they enter the 70k BTC once again, and in turn earn another 9766 Byteballs
assuming the price stays the same =
ICONOMI will own over 2.2million dollars USD or 10% of a currency.
one single entity owns 10% vs the other 7billion people on earth.
and that is just ICONOMI.. not to mention the other people that own large percentage.. LISK etc.
how is this fair, your giving a small portion of about 10 people 95% of the supply.
your project is already set up to fail, another project will take its place with a clone of byteballs with a fair distribution, excellent idea, failed distribution method, logic = lets give millionaires massive portions of the supply.
How is this fair? How is it in the real world, yet you are transacting with currencies? You think on your national economy that 1% or less of the population does not control the 90% of money supply? That 1 person can not crash your average western european countries economy? LOL. And extended to world economy, 150 people can move as much capital as the next 6billion combined.
If you are dealing with money, if you are buying and selling goods, you are contributing to inequality and unfair unjust world. Each transaction you make, and every one else makes with anything of value, is contributing to inequality. Rich get richer and poor get poorer, its not a dumb cliche its a realization of facts builtin any economical system. If you like to try alternatives go to Venezuela.
Can you point to any economy in the real world in any historical point in time where distribution is equal and is over time equalizing? LOL.
Money is the root of all evil, it is designed not to be equal and fair, any monetary system which goes against this basic truth fails and people dont consider it valuable to transact with.
Life is unfair, deal with it. I got my 1gb from 1btc, and bought more with the same 1btc, now I have +40GB. Now I am 1000001.23% richer than all the 99.9% of people of planet earth who didnt know how to buy a btc and sign a message with their wallet, those who still have 0gb. Unfair to them? Iconomi is looking down on my 40gb from their stash of their 9138312gb, so what?
What would you suggest would be a better distribution method? How would you do your byteball clone to be fair?
how would i make my clone different? max of 10btc linked. fair. now its averaged against everyone somewhat equally, not 1 entity has 100000x times more than every other person, ready waiting to dump the market with over $250,000 usd worth.
i think with such a new approach, why set up for failure, is this method the absolute fairest and best method the developer could think of? or am i missing something?
its the equivalent of having 1000 people stuck on an island and finding a load of 500 apples, and saying ok lets give 4 people 448 of those apples, and the remaining 996 people will have to share 2 apples. its actually cringe worthy how they think this was ever fair, its setup the market for failure, this will continue to be a topic of weakness throughout the coins life.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
what a completely unfair distribution.. its going to be a dump fest from now till next distribution.. and then after a fresh batch of people get distrubted another 50%.. another dump fest.. best time to buy would be around march. but even then still another 9x the current amount to be distributed.
dump fest.price is rising. aint nobody dumping their balls.
well lets do some simple math.
ICONOMI - one of the linked addresses to receive byteballs.
ICONOMI linked 70k btc - giving them 9.766% of the total supply by the time all distribution is over.
so they currently own 9766 byteballs = 245btc = $221,446 US dollars.
mid feb is the next round. they enter the 70k BTC once again, and in turn earn another 9766 Byteballs
assuming the price stays the same =
ICONOMI will own over 2.2million dollars USD or 10% of a currency.
one single entity owns 10% vs the other 7billion people on earth.
and that is just ICONOMI.. not to mention the other people that own large percentage.. LISK etc.
how is this fair, your giving a small portion of about 10 people 95% of the supply.
your project is already set up to fail, another project will take its place with a clone of byteballs with a fair distribution, excellent idea, failed distribution method, logic = lets give millionaires massive portions of the supply.
The next newbie, who is talking crap...
70k BTC were linked by ALL, not only ICONOMI!
Greetz
Steve
Ok regardless of the figures on linked amounts being incorrect, they still own 10% of the supply, and others own similar, so those figures are irrelevant.
its easy enough to say "another newbie talking crap"
but all my points are valid, they are not made up or exaggerated.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
what a completely unfair distribution.. its going to be a dump fest from now till next distribution.. and then after a fresh batch of people get distrubted another 50%.. another dump fest.. best time to buy would be around march. but even then still another 9x the current amount to be distributed.
dump fest.price is rising. aint nobody dumping their balls.
well lets do some simple math.
ICONOMI - one of the linked addresses to receive byteballs.
ICONOMI linked 7k btc - giving them 9.766% of the total supply by the time all distribution is over.
so they currently own 9766 byteballs = 245btc = $221,446 US dollars.
mid feb is the next round. they enter the 7k BTC once again, and in turn earn another 9766 Byteballs
assuming the price stays the same =
ICONOMI will own over 2.2million dollars USD or 10% of a currency.
one single entity owns 10% vs the other 7billion people on earth.
and that is just ICONOMI.. not to mention the other people that own large percentage.. LISK etc.
how is this fair, your giving a small portion of about 10 people 95% of the supply.
your project is already set up to fail, another project will take its place with a clone of byteballs with a fair distribution, excellent idea, failed distribution method, logic = lets give millionaires massive portions of the supply.