Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 132 results by JarBinks
Why do people go immediately to the dumbest sounding conspiracy ideas possible whenever anything isnt exactly as expected?
I guess I should have put "LOL" after it because I was being sarcastic
Well so far they went back on their word to me. Which is disappointing.
Maybe they will ship to me but for now I am disappointed.
Maybe they will ship to me but for now I am disappointed.
Bummer!!
I have been watching this also and I appreciate you being the tip of the spear Phil.
Maybe it's a Bitmain shill site?
Good idea actually: 17QnVor1B6oK1rWnVVBrdX9gFzVkZZbhDm
Quoted
Hello, Chrondosia91989, 17/08/30
1Ba5mWaZeFDSwN6AqjFTQbwWpT869fT4Vz
H8RGmmftW5xP6RT891C5JpB+foiX82O+FHyyfcFMDLh+FecaEayuUmQCmh8/auqtLbkYI/v/4awqW4XUIKgKQ1A=
Quoted and verified
http://www.coinig.com/?adr=1Ba5mWaZeFDSwN6AqjFTQbwWpT869fT4Vz&msg=Hello%2C+Chrondosia91989%2C+17%2F08%2F30&sig=H8RGmmftW5xP6RT891C5JpB%2BfoiX82O%2BFHyyfcFMDLh%2BFecaEayuUmQCmh8%2FauqtLbkYI%2Fv%2F4awqW4XUIKgKQ1A%3D
Congratulations!!
Quoted and verified
http://www.coinig.com/?adr=1BvyvUp3rcFYtsuz9aZjqSGnwe4sE4EUKA&msg=Karartma1%27s+public+btc+address+as+of+2017-08-28&sig=H4k1Rdl6lRZ2jKk%2B%2Bas7bA47P7jHUWLDzT1xZihc10HQOGpFkwYrmgzKdjigClWtq8vWyl%2FwhN1RIgWLsy3hUME%3D
Quote
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Karartma1's public btc address as of 2017-08-28
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1BvyvUp3rcFYtsuz9aZjqSGnwe4sE4EUKA
H4k1Rdl6lRZ2jKk++as7bA47P7jHUWLDzT1xZihc10HQOGpFkwYrmgzKdjigClWtq8vWyl/whN1RIgWLsy3hUME=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Karartma1's public btc address as of 2017-08-28
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1BvyvUp3rcFYtsuz9aZjqSGnwe4sE4EUKA
H4k1Rdl6lRZ2jKk++as7bA47P7jHUWLDzT1xZihc10HQOGpFkwYrmgzKdjigClWtq8vWyl/whN1RIgWLsy3hUME=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Quoted and verified
http://www.coinig.com/?adr=1BvyvUp3rcFYtsuz9aZjqSGnwe4sE4EUKA&msg=Karartma1%27s+public+btc+address+as+of+2017-08-28&sig=H4k1Rdl6lRZ2jKk%2B%2Bas7bA47P7jHUWLDzT1xZihc10HQOGpFkwYrmgzKdjigClWtq8vWyl%2FwhN1RIgWLsy3hUME%3D
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
For Claymore Eth/Sia/DCR miner, what URL:PORT for ETH and SIA should be used?
As well as the connection method variable for Claymore; proxy, stratum, etc
As well as the connection method variable for Claymore; proxy, stratum, etc
Just an example but, this command line is dual mining Ethereum-Classic, using a direct port, and SIA, using an algo port.
Yours might need to be a little different.
Code:
EthDcrMiner64.exe -r -1 -epool us-east.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20555 -ewal -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1 -dpool hub.miningpoolhub.com:17022 -dwal -dpsw x -dcoin sc -dcri 40
Re: ░▒▓█[ITALYIIMP]█▓▒░ [ANN][MULTIPOOL][AUTOTRADE][AUTOSWITCH][0%FEES FOR 99DAYS]
Ciao, io aspetto quasi un mese per il pagamento sul mio indirizzo BTC 1LxPMkMbd9f6TMRznNDWHc2iG7DKu1nnEr
Il mio equilibrio 0.01000127 BTC.
Quanto tempo è necessario attendere fino a quando il BTC ha inviato?
già in attesa quattro settimane
Grazie
-----------------------------------------------
Hi, I've been waiting for a payback for my BTC address for almost a month 1LxPMkMbd9f6TMRznNDWHc2iG7DKu1nnEr
My balance is 0.01000127 BTC.
How long do you have to wait for BTC to be sent?
I'm waiting for 4 weeks
Thanks
Il mio equilibrio 0.01000127 BTC.
Quanto tempo è necessario attendere fino a quando il BTC ha inviato?
già in attesa quattro settimane
Grazie
-----------------------------------------------
Hi, I've been waiting for a payback for my BTC address for almost a month 1LxPMkMbd9f6TMRznNDWHc2iG7DKu1nnEr
My balance is 0.01000127 BTC.
How long do you have to wait for BTC to be sent?
I'm waiting for 4 weeks
Thanks
I did a little test even though there was some negative feedback here.
The pool worked as I thought it should, I got paid as expected and the quoted complaint also got paid.
During the time I was watching, the coin count went up, so someone was doing something.
Maybe the op was on a beach with a frosty beverage and I just missed the bulk of the away time.
For the time being I will use this pool...cautiously.
Please verify and quote. Thank you!
Code:
1MCvvdAoF8ag6NNovXPZg5PS3r2JWuiE8e
Code:
Bitcointalk:picolo 25th Aug 2017
Code:
H6vGoR5V39rpJso5vVsQVsCaIuYBYXP0Rcj8nBx6YR/rWd0usg2FXVw90D7VSF295UWSxBSdMneNs26ZAhH70sM=
Quoted and verified
http://www.coinig.com/?adr=1MCvvdAoF8ag6NNovXPZg5PS3r2JWuiE8e&msg=Bitcointalk%3Apicolo+25th+Aug+2017&sig=H6vGoR5V39rpJso5vVsQVsCaIuYBYXP0Rcj8nBx6YR%2FrWd0usg2FXVw90D7VSF295UWSxBSdMneNs26ZAhH70sM%3D
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
Hello, love the pool!!!
Changing to GH for x11, qubit & quark to stay inline with NH?
Home Page Says:
* values in mBTC/MH/day, per GH for sha256 & blake algos, kSol. for equihash
Pool pages say:
* 24h estimation from net difficulty in mBTC/MH/day (in TH for sha256 & GH for blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash)
Changing to GH for x11, qubit & quark to stay inline with NH?
Home Page Says:
* values in mBTC/MH/day, per GH for sha256 & blake algos, kSol. for equihash
Pool pages say:
* 24h estimation from net difficulty in mBTC/MH/day (in TH for sha256 & GH for blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash)
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
I know ETH is way too big, but what about other DaggerHashimoto coins like DBIX?
If going to add Dagger then I say ETH and ETC are worth while
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
Here is something I have been wondering about.
I rent from NH, lets say x11, and I have the possibility of creating 1 order/miner with 500Ghs.
Is it better to have 1 big order or multiple small orders?
For some of the coins that are on x11 that would be alot of hashing power.
My thought is that a few smaller orders is better because it allows the pool to switch around.
1 big order would be focused on the coins that can handle it, which may not be the most profitable.
I have no facts to support my idea so I thought I would ask you.
I rent from NH, lets say x11, and I have the possibility of creating 1 order/miner with 500Ghs.
Is it better to have 1 big order or multiple small orders?
For some of the coins that are on x11 that would be alot of hashing power.
My thought is that a few smaller orders is better because it allows the pool to switch around.
1 big order would be focused on the coins that can handle it, which may not be the most profitable.
I have no facts to support my idea so I thought I would ask you.
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
HI!! 
Looks as though NiceHash has changed the minimum difficulty for Qubit.
https://www.nicehash.com/?p=pool-operators
Looks as though NiceHash has changed the minimum difficulty for Qubit.
https://www.nicehash.com/?p=pool-operators
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
Hello,
First time on miningpoolhub, rented some hashpower on nicehash and trying to connect port 17014 (qubit) but nicehash gives an error "difficulty too low" it says that it should be at least 0.05 but pools difficulty is 0.03 and because of that, it just doesn't even connects to the pool.
btw i have connected with password d=8 which works well with other pools that i'm using. Is there any configuration that i'm missing for nicehash?
user id: 61993
First time on miningpoolhub, rented some hashpower on nicehash and trying to connect port 17014 (qubit) but nicehash gives an error "difficulty too low" it says that it should be at least 0.05 but pools difficulty is 0.03 and because of that, it just doesn't even connects to the pool.
btw i have connected with password d=8 which works well with other pools that i'm using. Is there any configuration that i'm missing for nicehash?
user id: 61993
I have set minimum 0.1 difficulty for nicehash miners few days ago. It should work fine.
I don't know why nicehash doesn't notify their changes to pools.
I hate to say but it does not look like the NiceHash Qubit issue is quite resolved.
The best option for today to earn free of charge BITCOIN is a site FREEBITCOIN:
1. You can win some satoshi every hour
2. Multiply your bitcoins playing an HI-LO game
3. Buy tickets in lottery and had chance to win more BTC once a week
4. And many other good surprises
REGISTRATION https://freebitco.in/?r=2565132
1. You can win some satoshi every hour
2. Multiply your bitcoins playing an HI-LO game
3. Buy tickets in lottery and had chance to win more BTC once a week
4. And many other good surprises
REGISTRATION https://freebitco.in/?r=2565132
Notice the "r=" in the link, this person would get a kickback for any activity you have on this faucet.
Not saying that is a bad thing but, you need to be aware of that to understand if the information being provided is good.
Mining hardware usually requires a little bit of tweaking and playing around to get best results.
Maybe try some different mining software and pools to see if the problem still exists.
Not that I am endorsing it but Nicehash miner might be something to test, it uses multiple mining software, multiple algos, multiple coins.
I know zpool keeps statistics for each hardware type so you can compare.
Maybe try some different mining software and pools to see if the problem still exists.
Not that I am endorsing it but Nicehash miner might be something to test, it uses multiple mining software, multiple algos, multiple coins.
I know zpool keeps statistics for each hardware type so you can compare.
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
The API went down today. The error is '501 Not implemented'. I need the API to make use of this pool; has something changed?
From the top of the webpage :
- API is disabled due to high DDoS attack. Will add some limitation per account and reopen it soon.
Bummer!
I also cannot mine on the pool without the API being active.
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
Mining Pool Hub Notice
Pool had some problem and did not work well for about 8 hours.
(It did not affect ethereum/ethereum-classic server and Siacoin)
Normally, pool automatically recover from failure state but it did not run as expected this time.
I investigated the issue and fixed potential problem, tested all logic again.
I will set affected pool's fee as 0% for a week
Sorry for inconvenience.
I believe this issue will not happen again.
Pool had some problem and did not work well for about 8 hours.
(It did not affect ethereum/ethereum-classic server and Siacoin)
Normally, pool automatically recover from failure state but it did not run as expected this time.
I investigated the issue and fixed potential problem, tested all logic again.
I will set affected pool's fee as 0% for a week
Sorry for inconvenience.
I believe this issue will not happen again.
Glad to hear everything is ok, I was wondering what was happening.
I really didn't want to loose anther auto exchange pool as the ranks are thinning out as time goes by.
Thanks for the free week!
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.4.4, NEW Nicehash support for Cryptonight
Proposal for change in output for share submissions.
old format:
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] accepted: 1791/1791 (100%), 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s yes!
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] accepted: 1791/1792 (99.9%), 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s nooooo
proposed new format:
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] Accepted: 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s, 1791/1791 (100%)
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] Rejected: 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s, 1791/1792 (99.9%)
Reason for change:
- shorter
- removes ambiguous "accepted" for both accepted and rejected shares
- eliminates unnecessary words "yes!" and "nooooo".
Comments?
old format:
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] accepted: 1791/1791 (100%), 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s yes!
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] accepted: 1791/1792 (99.9%), 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s nooooo
proposed new format:
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] Accepted: 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s, 1791/1791 (100%)
[2016-08-27 21:09:13] Rejected: 11.93 MH, 461.52 kH/s, 1791/1792 (99.9%)
Reason for change:
- shorter
- removes ambiguous "accepted" for both accepted and rejected shares
- eliminates unnecessary words "yes!" and "nooooo".
Comments?
I think the current format has become the defacto standard.
Though I am all about being different, I.E. bleeding edge, and I support any change.
My only concern would be that no changes happen with how the API is presents data, which I am pretty sure this will not.
Thanks for your comment.
I agree the API should not be different among miners as well as primary command line options. Console output is a little
less rigid.
I believe the current format, with some variations, is the convention for cpuminer and ccminer only. Those variations include
displaying hash count as well as rate, and "yes!" "noooo" instead of "yeah!!!" "boooo". AMD miners and alternative miners
have completely different output formats. I don't feel bound by the current format if it can be improved.
Any change to the output format could affect users who run filters on the output and expect a certain format. They would
have to modify their filters for the new format.
Good point about the people parsing the output!!!
Maybe make a switch to allow the new and improved vs. the legacy output just in case.