It’s based on the every person,because some need of immediate money for their regular expenses.For them,I will suggest to use of the Signature campaign which paying bitcoin.Because the weekly payment will be used for the daily expenses.Even you can support your family with out job using the bitcoin paying signature campaign.But this is not the fact in Bounty campaign.Bounty campaign will pay and but they pay more dollars then the bitcoin paying signature campaign.



Since the project is based on the altcoin,you can do the bounty which includes the signature campaign.So that your project get marketing in all the social media including Facebook,Twitter,YouTube.When you include signature campaign in bounty,you get marketing in bitcointalk forum also.

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Jcw188
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=
Participated Campaigns: Signature campaign
BSC Wallet Address:

I've been hearing very good things about this company from various sources, but I'm still a bit skeptical. I have lots of BTC from investments and don't mind putting some into this. I definitely see the potential in this company and will only hope the results I get are great. Going to shoot you a PM OP.

Will also update you guys with results! Wish me luck.

creating your own ponzi game, on a ponzi platform
this is a new concept lol

im in
this looks really good 

GONE GONE GONE GONE GONE.

0.00030 BTC will be its heyday

What's your tech for anonymous transactions? Some sort of new CoinJoin implementation?

This may be the most significant cryptocurrency news that has taken place recently.
Are DarkNote messages really as anonymous as the payments?

I found this tread just two weeks ago, the guys provide a thorough guide into creating coins based on their tech. You should give it a look, I think.

I just read the last few pages and would also like to know what's happened here! Not to use a soundbyte but really guys, what are you hoping to achieve with all this? Surely making peace not war is preferable to bashing - what will that do for any coin's success or the community image? Both are vitally important, I'm sure you wouldn't disagree there.

It's true - perhaps it's easy to forget that nothing has fallen apart. Innovation is being unveiled and progress from CN coins is happening, with positive consequences.


I would just take the perspective that as a concept, CN is working and producing results which are not just admirable but exciting as well, and we should take a level-headed, embracing attitude to developments while there is still no evidence to the contrary.

pretty much agreed.

But currency aims likewise should not detract from CN itself: its devs have put in such an insane amount of work and there are considerably easier ways to make a quick bit of cash. Consistency of strategy also points to this.

I would even suggest that some of the more unsavory talk on this forum when it comes to coin wars was assumed by CN - competition is competition after all, and communities will want to silence the criticism by demonstrating real progress, which in turn allows coins with real talent behind them to become more credible for everyone's benefit.

What's up with the overwhelming negative response?

The guys share their knowledge with everyone who's interested and what they get in return is some BS about SSL certificate and ulterior motives.

Can we please stay more on-point? The topic is creating forks based on CN tehnology, not deducing why it isn't legitimate. If you feel that OP is trying to scam people, you are free to provide arguments, instead of creating more FUD where there is enough already. Alternatively you can always just stay out of a thread you don't like: it's that easy!

These are actually valid points. Being listed on the Bitcointalk.org from the moment of coin's launch isn't a single criterion to determine if it was premined or not, and it can't be. Just think about how bizarre that sounds: a site that has no affiliation with a forum adds a coin, mining of which was in no way restricted to new users, and now it has to attribute a premined status to it based on the coin's abscence on the said forum.

The point about Bitcoin is also sound, we've all seen this chart:



Yet everyone is all right with Gliss not adding ** next to Bitcoin.

Why don't we all just stop giving a damn and give Gliss a break, guys? I (and some other guys too) researched the situation a bit and found out that BCN was deepmined for two years in the Darknet by a group of about 200 miners. Whether you want to call it premine is highly questionable and ultimately irrelevant, as (**) is there to protect investors from scams of all sorts.

But for whatever reasons the developers and deep web community they started with wanted the degree of control over the coin the deepmining decision provided, it's got to be something other than a pump-a-dump scheme that everyone's implying, because BCN isn't a mere fork of Bitcoin: the amount of time and financial resources invested into the underlying CryptoNote technology outweighs the possible benefit from a simple scam.

The amount of investment is, I feel, the reason for their wish to manipulate the coin to some degree, as the developers have a certain vision for their brainchild's further fate and don't want it determined by random influences. So if I were Gliss, I would do just the same: instead of arguing non-stop about preminine or not and getting bogged down in aimless quarrels, I'd just look at the root of the problem and make the same decision.

You could go back and look at his last post...yes he said he'd be raising next session well above the other current competitor rates. Who knows how high that is or for how long he will keep it there but it's certainly exciting!

I assume this factors in the fact that many people are trying to get vanity addresses?  how fast can these generators generate new addys?

Anything to get at least some scamming out of the public for all your "hard work."  Folks when something is too good to be true...

Ok there is going to be a problem with the site.  I was on there playing around.  I saw that a guy klein was doing autobets I think.  So I started betting a lot, pressing the button over and over to bet and bet.  My computer started getting slow, and it stopped updating the "all bets" section.  I don't think you're going to be able to show "all bets" once you start getting more traffic.  Also my laptop fan started going crazy while I was on the site betting.