Search content
Sort by
Showing 2 of 2 results by JoeGTN1
I'm getting compilation errors on Linux:
"get" is a pretty hard search term to figure out what templated function I'm looking for.
I'm also not exactly sure which pieces I'm supposed to be building, but with the other "BITCOIN_BUILD" options I get other errors, some with WX (no target set), others with json_spirit (int64 isn't a valid type for some reason, I got it to keep going once by changing them all to int64_t).
Thoughts? Different place I should be asking?
Code:
OPTION(BITCOIN_ENABLE_CUDA "Enable CUDA miner" ON)
OPTION(BITCOIN_ENABLE_OPENCL "Enable OpenCL miner" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_ENABLE_REMOTE_SERVER "Enable remote miner server" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_GUI "Build Server GUI (bitcoin)" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_DAEMON "Build Server Daemon (bitcoind)" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_REMOTE_MINER "Build remote miner (bitcoinr)" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_RPC_MINER "Build RPC miner (rpcminer)" ON)
OPTION(BITCOIN_ENABLE_OPENCL "Enable OpenCL miner" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_ENABLE_REMOTE_SERVER "Enable remote miner server" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_GUI "Build Server GUI (bitcoin)" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_DAEMON "Build Server Daemon (bitcoind)" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_REMOTE_MINER "Build remote miner (bitcoinr)" OFF)
OPTION(BITCOIN_BUILD_RPC_MINER "Build RPC miner (rpcminer)" ON)
Code:
/root/z/rpc/src/rpcminer/../minercommon/../serialize.h: In function unsigned int GetSerializeSize(const boost::tuples::tuple&, int, int):
/root/z/rpc/src/rpcminer/../minercommon/../serialize.h:579:31: error: get was not declared in this scope
/root/z/rpc/src/rpcminer/../minercommon/../serialize.h: In function void Serialize(Stream&, const boost::tuples::tuple&, int, int):
/root/z/rpc/src/rpcminer/../minercommon/../serialize.h:588:19: error: get was not declared in this scope
...
/root/z/rpc/src/rpcminer/../minercommon/../serialize.h:579:31: error: get was not declared in this scope
/root/z/rpc/src/rpcminer/../minercommon/../serialize.h: In function void Serialize(Stream&, const boost::tuples::tuple&, int, int):
/root/z/rpc/src/rpcminer/../minercommon/../serialize.h:588:19: error: get was not declared in this scope
...
"get" is a pretty hard search term to figure out what templated function I'm looking for.
I'm also not exactly sure which pieces I'm supposed to be building, but with the other "BITCOIN_BUILD" options I get other errors, some with WX (no target set), others with json_spirit (int64 isn't a valid type for some reason, I got it to keep going once by changing them all to int64_t).
Thoughts? Different place I should be asking?
Re: New mining pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution
First of all thanks for setting up a second pool for everybody; I recently got into the BTC hype but was having trouble going at it alone. I've been running for about 8 hours with little to no problems, although I don't have much to compare to seeing this is the first pooled experience I have. The only issue I've seen so far is occasionally DiabloMiner will give the following feedback:
85413/90697 khash/secException in thread "DiabloMiner Executor (GeForce GTX 295
(#1)/2)" java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$DeviceState$ExecutionState$Ge
tWorkParser.parse(DiabloMiner.java:731)
I thought that I fixed this issue yesterday... Ok, will check again, thanks for your report 85413/90697 khash/secException in thread "DiabloMiner Executor (GeForce GTX 295
(#1)/2)" java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$DeviceState$ExecutionState$Ge
tWorkParser.parse(DiabloMiner.java:731)
I'll second this, I've gotten it about 5 times in the past 5 hours w/ Diablo on a GTX460, I also have cpuminer-0.7 going and got a few "not enough semaphores" or some such. Most of the time Diablo recovers and keeps going, once it went like 20min without doing any work before I killed it.
Should I have a separate account/worker set-up for the cpuminer? I currently have them both logged in to the same user.
Also, I think everything is fine, but should I be expecting more than ~8Mh/s out of an i7 860 and 44Mh/s out of a GTX 460?