I'm pretty sure you're talking about Social Anxiety and not Anti-Social...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety


Please stop spreading FUD. I invested in Barwizi's projects from the very beginning of NRB about 1 year ago and I already made more money than I hoped for with a few smart moves along the way. It's true that Barwizi can be silent for longish periods at times, which has caused it's share of FUD along the way, but he always come back to steer everything in the right direction.

And one thing is sure, he is most definitely NOT a scammer!

Bonjour à tous,

Je suis responsable de la traduction française des documents du Noir Investment Groupe (Groupe d'Investissement Noir).
Le groupe est, entre autres choses, à l'origine des NoirShares, une cryptomonnaie PoS/PoW.

Voici un lien vers la traduction des documents d'entreprise expliquant en quoi consiste le groupe et comment y investir.

Project Definition (French) - Définition du Projet
Investment Options (French) - Options d'investissement

Pour plus d'information, voici un lien vers le thread original (en anglais).

NRS|NoirShares

My choice of word wasn't directed at anybody specifically, it is more of a general feeling that I (and I'm sure a few others) have about people spreading FUD since the beginning of the whole LRM project.
Oh and yeah, I read every since word of the thread since page 1, the day it all started. This might be pertinent background information.

I stated at the beginning of my post that this was my understanding of the situation, and I didn't ask for your input on it, or anyone else's for that matter.
This is the thought process that led me to ask this direct question to LabRat and is required for him to understand the meaning of my question.

I will no longer reply to anyone else about the content of my previous post. Thanks for your understanding.

Here is my understanding of the situation.

Given that :
1. LabRat has realised that the company is doomed to fail soon with only a 25% reinvestment rate.
2. LabRat has become uneasy about the few people threatening to sue left and right.

The following happened :
3. LabRat needed to change the policy for a bigger reinvestment rate (to avoid the failure of the company).
4. LabRat needed to use a lawyer to craft a new contract which allow for the new reinvestment rate without being at risk of being sued by the few assholes in (2).
5. Everything LabRat has said since then in the new contract and AMA is his lawyer speaking through him, which is obviously going to protect him legally speaking.

I want to say I am from the silent majority/minority (who knows at this point) that have been supporting LabRat in every decision he made before this legal mumbo-jumbo.
LabRat has always been honest with us in his intentions from the beginning (until he lawyered up), even if he never told much detail about what is going on with LRM on a day to day basis.
He always said that he wanted the company to grow and our share to grow with it, and kept this word until now.
The new system allows the company to still be profitable and increase our payout while remaining legally protected.

_________________________________________

My question for LabRat is the following :

Do you intend to keep the same philosophy you always kept until now (for us to profit from the company's growth at your side) or has that changed in any way (since you might have lost respect for the people outlined in (2), for example)? The change could include but is not limited to diluting the shares, preventing us from profiting of the discretionary bonus hashrate.

If your philosophy is still the same, I will be one to go through with the change of contract, since this whole thing has always been trust-based, and I personally think that every decision you took before profited us as investors.

BTW, this question is in no way legal advice and is purely about your personal philosophy/ethics.

9a6qHJD1vQ1aED4bWX8tBDFKuMW4PKkmLQ

Thanks!

Erm, it brings our BTC total to 1.85 (grand total 2.05), not 1.8! We were at 1.55 BTC previously.
Thanks in advance for fixing this!

I just invested a bit more! 

User: Zapa (John122)
Amount: 0.3 BTC
Tx Number: 8659cc331c9ff9af28e160dd569a6c347d72dd89a6ff5d7256aa9add3debb0c9

I'm done with the French translation!

Investment Options (French) - Options d'investissement
Project Definition (French) - Définition du Projet

The miner doesn't work anymore since last night. It worked fine before. Tried the 3 port numbers with the new version on the two computers I was mining with before, same result.
But if I try on another computer I never mined with (for testing purposes), it works...

Amount: 0.55 BTC
User: Zapa (John122)
Tx ID: 7b2600f1640efb21deac9ad812e1d8d723e5976698be49c2a9ca8f7894fca9fe

We would like to invest another 0.55 BTC each. Do we still send it to the same address?

Since you just purchased the remaining 8 shares, I suppose we can't invest anymore, can we?
If we can't, would you be open to sell a part of your 8 shares? Jerjian and I would be interested in investing another amount of BTC in the General Fund.

There you go for the first document! The other one will follow by the end of the week.

Investment Options (French) - Options d'investissement

EDIT: The graphics got all fucked up going to Google Docs, I'll also fix it by the end of the week.

I started the translation. I'm sending one of the translated files tonight, the other one might be in a few days.
Where can I send it to you?

I might be interested in doing the French translation. What would you need translated?

Invested a bit more.

Amount: 2000 NRS
User: Zapa (John122)
Tx ID: 7c054058305d77f5686e7beb87bd47bc611a47cdfd59788a0d99d1fe3aefe3ac

I just invested.

Amount: 1.0 BTC
User: Zapa (I'm using my NoirbitsTalk username).
Tx ID: 66748344aedb74569e7ddede3837e3bc2a100bb7c4e2961a2063b9665dd23b7e

I wasn't keeping up with this thread for the last few weeks and now that I'm back, all I'm seeing is talk about scrypt-jane currencies, so I'm kind of confused.
Why the sudden surge of interest for these? Are scrypt currencies least profitable now or is this just a trend? Is this due to a new functionality of CudaMiner?

Does anybody have a working link for a good 32-bit jhPrimeminer version?
I just got hold of an old laptop and all the links for 32-bit versions seem to be down...

Also, primer-, I can't seem to find a link for that hp11 version (be it 32 or 64-bit) you're talking about. Could you link me to it?

Maybe they purchase in big quantities and don't want to go through multiple buyers (and maybe get a slight discount from LabRat for the quantity).