Is it possible to create a thread dedicated to another trading signals on this forum? I would like to open a thread for this,

You don't need technical indicators to do a good analysis. The chart already gives you all the information you need to avoid pitfalls and spot liquidity. Just try to understand the market movements because these movements make sense, they are not random.

First the first question you need to ask yourself is, where does the money I earn come from, or, where does the money I lose in the financial markets come from.

If you can find the right answer to this question you will be very wary.

If you won $100 on the financial markets, know that someone else lost $100.

If you lose $100, know that someone else won $100.

Because trading is a zero-sum game. The money you keep or lose does not come from central banks, but rather from us individuals. We are the liquidity. And the big players in the market manipulate us as they wish.

People make us believe that the market moves based on supply and demand when this is totally false. On the contrary, the market rises when there are many sellers and Shiites when there are many buyers.

You have to avoid strategies that are popular, because they are the supply and demand, they are the liquidity. And the only purpose of the market is to get out, it is to trap them.

You should avoid using technical indicators. Because these indicators are not created with the purpose of making you profit, these indicators are just there to create liquidity.

If you think like everyone else or if you follow everything you see on the internet you will always lose. Because the movements that the market makes are not random. The market follows liquidity (follow the mass to trap the mass)

In trying to understand the manipulation of financial markets, the most important thing is to know where not to land.

This is what I wanted to share with you guys today, to open your eyes to some characters. Forget all the strategies that are popular guys because these are the strategies that Serve as liquidity to the market .

Ask questions if you have any, I will answer all your concerns.

Apparently you didn't understand my message well. I am not currently applying for a loan, I applied for the loan here on this forum two to three weeks ago, but my collateral could not cover the loan.  It is my training that I wish to make available to you and I even said that you will pay me only after your satisfaction.

My strategy is not SMC or ict it is based solely on liquidity cycles. It is without indicator
 I will trade it for $60, but you don't have to send me the money right away.
 I will make the training available to you and if you are satisfied you can then pay me the $60.
 I need money, I want to buy a prop firm account to be able to develop. Help me please 🙏
You can contact me here: joeldanvikpenon@gmail.com 

I will repay the full loan once the challenge is completed, within a maximum of one month. As for the collateral, I’m waiting for the lender to specify their preferred procedure.

A trust wallet is where I hold my babydoge tokens, it is also with this wallet that I make my transactions

Apparently no one wants to help me 🤕

While searching on Google for ways to get a loan, I came across this platform. I registered and, after reading the terms, I realized my chances were slim. That’s why I decided to explain my loan request, hoping that a lender might be willing to help if it suits them.

Loan amount: $35
Purpose: to buy a $5,000 prop firm account with FundedNext
Collateral: a Trust Wallet portfolio containing BabyDoge tokens
Repayment: I will pay a 15% interest on the $35 after successfully completing the challenge.

Is this possible?

With PoW, it depends on the computing power of the miners. It is very secure, but the problem is that it can create centralization because of the high hardware and energy costs. PoS, on the other hand, secures the network based on the amount of crypto you have. It allows many people to validate transactions, so it helps decentralization, even if those who have more tokens can have more power.

As for the environmental impact and scalability, it changes the game. PoW, everyone criticizes it for its huge energy consumption. PoS is seen as a better choice, more eco-friendly, with a lower carbon footprint. In addition, PoS makes transactions validate faster and at a lower cost, so it makes the system more fluid and pushes adoption.  Basically, PoW can struggle with high latencies and fees when things get hot, while PoS does better in this regard.

Indeed, the bulk sale of Bitcoin by large companies could drive down the price, especially if it happens at the same time as other market events.
 It is also possible that these companies are adopting a long-term strategy, seeking to hold on to their assets to extract maximum value from them over the long term.

BlackRock buying $1.5 billion in Bitcoin in just two days for its ETF is a real turning point for the crypto world! I think it shows that institutional investors are really starting to believe in Bitcoin as a serious asset. You could even say that it could encourage other big companies to do the same, which could increase demand and, consequently, the price of Bitcoin. In addition, with a Bitcoin ETF, it makes investing more accessible for those who don't want to complicate their lives with the direct purchase of crypto. Personally, I found it to be a good opportunity, even if the market can sometimes be unpredictable. What do you think? Do you think other companies will follow suit?

If I were to talk to members of the Beninese parliament about Bitcoin, I would tell them that Bitcoin is a great opportunity to promote financial inclusion, especially in areas where banks are difficult to access. In addition, Bitcoin brings exceptional transparency thanks to its blockchain, where each transaction is verifiable and secure. Rather than fearing this technology, I would invite them to consider Bitcoin as a complement to traditional currencies and to think about a balanced legal framework that would make it possible to take advantage of its potential while protecting citizens and the national economy.

I am a student and I do not have an inheritance to give yet, but that does not prevent me from giving my opinion.

I am leaning towards plan A, but I think that a few elements should be added to make it even more solid. The idea of building a multi-signature wallet is really good for ensuring security, but it would also be important to train the heirs so that they know how to manage these assets. In addition, having clear documentation on the steps to follow and the locations of the backups could really help avoid confusion. For example, we can establish a document that explains how to access the backups and how to use the keys to recover the wallet, while showing them how to do it step by step. This would ensure that, even if something happens, the heirs can easily access all of this. Basically, plan A is solid, but good communication and preparation of the heirs are essential for a successful transition.

I was surfing the net when I came across this article again, and I would like to give my opinion and know what you think about it too.

Honestly, I think the Satoshi Action Fund initiative could really shake things up for Bitcoin in the US. They are pushing several states to adopt pro-Bitcoin regulations, which could create a domino effect. If one state starts seeing more and more companies and startups getting into Bitcoin, others might not want to be left behind.

Also, with clearer regulations, larger companies that are still hesitant due to regulatory uncertainty could finally get on board. Ultimately, this could increase the value of Bitcoin and encourage everyone to get more interested in cryptocurrencies.

I am curious to see if this wave of pro-Bitcoin regulations could motivate lesser-known crypto projects to seek their own regulation and legitimacy if it succeeds in the US.

Honestly, worrying about who Satoshi is is just a distraction. What really matters is the technology and the idea behind Bitcoin. Instead of wondering who he is, I think we should focus on what makes Bitcoin great: revealing his identity could get us into trouble with governments. What matters most is strengthening the network and helping those who really want to understand this stuff.

There is also a psychological thing behind this story of (good) and (bad) money. People, when they feel that a coin or a bill has more value, they tend to get attached to it, as if it were a personal treasure. This is perhaps why some people keep their Bitcoin safe, hoping that it will become a kind of (digital luxury) instead of a currency that we use every day. In the end, the value we give to a currency is not just numbers, it is also a question of rarity and trust.