The excuse say crypto is used for fraud or anybody doing cryptocurrency is just disguising as they're fraudsters, na wetin go make us remain backwards for the world and Africa self because some other African countries dun dey advance pass us for crypto matters. The government no know wetin dem dey  miss by attacking crypto for the country wey be say dem supposed dey see how dem go welcome am so dem fit get inflow of businesses and companies dem wey dey associated with the industry so dem fit dey help strengthen the economy in various ways.

First e go bring about job creation, foreign investors and then revenue for the government. As for the activist, he's fighting a good battle and we can only hope he wins because we know as things dey be for this country. Las last the government get the final say because na dem get the government and they make the policy we dey guide the country so if dem say crypto bad for the economy, we can only hope they come to their senses to see that they're making a mistake.

Since most youths have seen that social media skit makers are cashing out big and living expensive lifestyles, we've noticed a majority of youths creating content up and down some of which are too irrelevant and contribute nothing to the viewers. They just want to get paid and since they want to get the required views and followers before their account is monetized, they are willing to go to any extent just to look for views including showing nudity and spreading false and unverified news just to attract their audience. In the end, some of them luckily get their accounts monetized and earn from it pulling up more crowds into the sector as though it's the only source of wealth in the digital space.

For us at this end, we know that ours isn't as loud as that of content creators and most of us normally enjoy doing things on the low key to avoid too much attention from our financial agencies since it appears as though they have a thing against us. For the traders, we know the risk involved and that it could get too good at some point or get bad at some other time, and then for the long-term investor, we know that our return doesn't come within a short space of time compared to most verified content creators that are currently earning from their page.

Which is more profitable? Content creators or crypto traders/investors.

One sign that tells you that someone is still some centuries behind is when you talk about an investment option with them and all they talk about is physical assets. Some don't even see buying a digital asset as a good investment option probably because they've been used to buying properties or assets they can easily see and show people that they own it or one that's popular like land, gold, houses, machinery, etc. But when it comes to choosing either physical or digital assets to invest in, the advantages of owning digital assets are far more than that of owning physical assets.

Advantages of digital assets.
1. You can be filthy rich with a Bitcoin holding that's worth $billions and still live a low-profile life unlike owning physical assets like acres of land or properties that are tied to your name and will bring unnecessary attention.

2. Digital assets are mobile which means that at any time you choose to relocate to a desired destination, you don't need to worry about selling all your assets before doing so, you can just sell a small fraction that's enough to sort out your traveling fair and keep holding to your digital asset. That's not possible for physical assets as it will require that you sell them under pressure and you might be forced to sell them at a very low price.

3. It's not subject to government regulations or environmental issues: digital assets are not subject to regulation of the government or environmental changes that will affect assets like lands, gold, houses, and properties. As long as you're with your keys and you're alive, regardless of the environmental hazard or bad government policy that's not favorable in your location, you can easily change location while holding your digital assets.

Physical assets are good from the standpoint of diversification of investment and maybe for showing off that you have wealth, but in comparison to digital assets like Bitcoin, it's better to invest in digital assets over most physical assets.

Why do we need to bring up a person with large capital to potentially confuse matters. 

A main difference with a person with large capital, such as the amount that you are suggesting is that he likely has more options because he is starting out with large capital that he might be able to invest in bitcoin, in the event that he has decided to allocate such capital (or part of such capital) to bitcoin.

If the person with large capital has not yet figured out bitcoin, then he is in a similar situation as any no coiner in terms of considering whether and how to invest in bitcoin once he figures out that he wants to buy bitcoin and once he figures out how much he wants to allocate, then he can figure between his various options in regards to how to get in. 

If the guy with $10 million in capital does not want to liquidate or reallocate any of his capital toward bitcoin, then he may well be faced with figuring out how to deal with his cashflow and expenses, which are similar kinds of issues that others have, yet the fact that you ar mentioning his high level of capital causes me to consider that you believe that he has the ability to allocate into bitcoin with some or all of that capital.


There are folks getting into bitcoin all time, and they are doing it in various kinds of ways, yet at the same time, there are a lot of folks, even folks with a lot of capital and a lot of income who still are either not convinced about bitcoin or they might believe they might believe they are too late.

Sure, more and more rich folks are finding out about bitcoin, and considering it as an investment option, yet we still have a pretty level of adoption, even amongst rich people.


Sure, you may well be presuming that since they might be able to do a lump sum, that they would do a lump sum investment style to get in, and that is not necessarily going to be the case.  Some rich folks try to be careful about creating taxable events, so if they have to sell another asset in order to get into bitcoin, they might prefer to DCA into whatever they are adding rather than doing lump sum, yet surely they have to figure out their own reallocation and perhaps how much they might have in cash versus in assets that might create taxable events if they sell and reallocate into bitcoin.


Rich people are faced with the same dilemma as everyone else when they are new to an investment like bitcoin, and even if they have an opportutnity to completely invest right away with lump summing, they might choose to allocate some of that for buying on dips and/or DCAing, even if they might be DCAing with thousands or tens of thousands per week rather than lower amounts.

They also be a bit less price sensitive, and they might spread their DCAs out to be monthly or quarterly, yet they could potentially front load with a buy like buying $1million within a week or two...and then considering their DCA'ing and/or buying on dips from there.  They might execute their own trades or they might give instructions regarding how to get their price exposure, maybe even ONLY recently learning about bitcoin from a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) in terms of bitcoin coming available within their investment accounts (presumptively through some of the spot ETFs that are only recently getting added into some of the accounts that some rich folks might have.

There is one thing that I want you to understand in bitcoin: no matter what when you are investing, that doesn’t mean that you will have nothing to you for your personal self, or that means you should not enjoy yourself. No, even though we all know that we need profit in bitcoin and we want the investment, we still have to invest the money that we can afford losing. That is the point, and if you restrict yourself from having all that you are already using just for the sake of investment, then what do you think will happen if someone happens to your investment? Even though we know that bitcoin is the number one trusted and reliable cryptocurrency to invest in without panicking about anything, that doesn’t mean you will always have a profit. Time will come that you will also lose, even though it is not much, but sometimes it tends to be much. 
 
All I want you to understand is that when I invest in bitcoin, you should always know that you don’t have to break yourself or your bank to achieve that because you will end up selling to fix other problems, and from there, that has affected your investment for a long time, so let us know what we are doing in the crypto space. 

👍
I'm not saying that you're wrong or that one investment strategy is better than the other. I was merely stating a point that if given an opportunity to purchase Bitcoin with a discount, big or small, they should always take it to get more units in Bitcoin than if they have purchased it without the discount. If the main strategy is a scheduled-DCA, sometimes it might be better to break the schedule to take advantage of the discount.