You're talking merged mining?

Lot of power came on recently. Good stuff, I know about 4thash I talked over from gigas pool.

Like the signature. I feel like most people assume all pool fees are 'about the same'

I'd suggest putting "0.25% Fees!!!!!!1!one" in the title.

It depends on your difficulty, but yeah generally well over 99% of the block goes to the miners on this pool.

I'll talk to them and get it on the preconfigured pool list.

Talked with him again this past week. He no longer controls the hashpower is my understanding.

If it's who I think it is, I might be seeing him tonight, I'll try and coax him back on the pool. Not positive it is though.

People seem to be pretty fickle about jumping hash power when pools get unlucky. I don't understand it, either just split it and keep it split or don't move it. It all averages out and nobody is good at 'picking winners'.

Bit better luck in the last 12 hours. :-)

I think I talked a couple of those guys on to the pool :-) Hope so at least.

Actually flashing my Avalons tonight, I'll probably get about that much additional hash power out of them.

No problem on the English, thanks for being a part of the pool and for adjusting your difficulty to 2048.

Nice luck streak before the difficulty adjustment.

Well, I wonder if this will actually work...

https://blockchain.info/tx/942f79f17ffc1987895adc99463b099f8bc88547b6aaefb4647df81f71c37e44


It's insanely hard to extract the useful information from this seething mass of blabber.


It went well :-)

I just finished rewiring a bunch of stuff, flashing firmware and setting everything to 2048 later today.

Anyone know who 1E8xjHavR1NwVv6tWTC6pX7Z93MWmMmPTx is?

Hey Guys, introduced myself at the orig thread over here.

Good to meet y'all. Ideas for growing the pool and reducing our variance?

Hi back.

It would have been 800 GH but, instead of setting up the other half of the boxes, I went on what will probably go down in history as the most expensive date I've ever been on. (Expenses measured in opportunity cost of 24 Hours @ 400 Gigahash/Second on or about June 20th 2013)

Oops.

I'd like to address your first whole half with the question "Where is the incentive?" and this half with the same question.

I'll also note that your downsides noted here are not simply something that can be assumed away. The're very real problems and they can't be dealt with by wishing them away.

Even if all of these problems get solved in the manner you've proposed (which they won't there's no incentive to solve them in such a manner) and the exchanges magically trust eachother, it's not the exchanges I'm worried about. It's people with guns and in control of armies. Solve that one.

Many centralized exchanges are still the crux of the issue here... centralized. I suggest you re-examine your first assertation that we can't create a decentralized exchange and work on solving the problem at that level.

Nice, thanks for the photos!

I LoL'd at Windows Mining Machine.

Sorry, know that's not helpful, but really take the time to learn the *nix ropes and you'll thank yourself later.