I have been away for a while, but I'm back!

Your bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=293474
Your current posts count (including this one): 1257
Amounts of merits that you earned in the last 120 days: 0
Your blackjack.fun username: Josepht

Will change everything to whatever is required after being accepted

You are very right about that; in the mean time they even got 13 currencies in stead of the 10 or 5.

Is there an ETA on the sportsbook on stake?
And will we be able to bet with all coins that are available on stake?

I noticed a mistake in your article


Since the payout includes the original bet, the real profit is 2.8 * $50 = $140, not $190

Really sad to see the investment option leave YOLOdice. Not only did I make a nice buck by investing on your website, but the idea that investing money that I love (BTC) in a industry that I love (casino's) is awesome, and it's sad to see it go.

I am usually sceptical when I hear those claims, so I compared Cloudbet's odds with sportsbet.io and Nitrogensports, and these are the results for today's matches in La Liga:



As you can see, their claims are (at least for today) correct.

Site looks bad, feels bad. Can't imagine it competing with other dice sites.

luckygames.io lets you roll whole numbers from 1 to 99. They offer gambling with like 100 altcoins, so I would say it's worth checking them out.

Let's hope so. More competitors creates (hopefully) better prices.

Well, just read the google forms page, and it'll be clear.


Edit: I removed safedice from my list, since I have doubts if it would be safe to play on their site.

Yeah sure, someone on primedice's own forum has an objective opinion 

I might be off here, but you already have all the information you need. Ethercrash runs the V1 version of bustabit. That should answer both of your questions.

I need to get that extra verification, so here is a picture of me today on the phone:

Thanks, I will implement those things soon!
Thanks man.
 I think they are all right, but not the best ones out there.

Yes, I try to keep things up to date. To be honest, I may have fallen behind in adding new sites. Mostly because I think that new sites need to prove themselves to be trustworthy first before I would advise them to viewers of this thread or the site.

Well thanks!
Those are indeed some important factors that I might use in the near future to review the casinos.
I personally prefer casinos with KYC, since it's just a mess that could prevent customers from getting their money. IMO, bitcoin gambling should be anonymous, and KYC is disastrous for that.

Yes, sure. If you did not know, some of these sites offer affiliate systems. If someone signs up with my link, I get a small percentage as a reward. I am willing to share half of it with the person who signs up with that link if they contact me beforehand.


That's cute, but I have heard some negative stories about betking, so I deleted them from my list.

This is not proof. This is just some data about some rolls that were made in the last 2000 bets.
If  (for example) you bet with lower risk at smaller amounts, and higher risk at larger amounts, it makes sense that the higher bet amount as a a lower win percentage in the end.
Also, I would assume that less bets were made with the high value, so it is a tiny sample. You would need a way bigger sample to provide proof.

Lastly, Kiritsugu already explained that the fact that you can verify the rolls already makes it impossible to be rigged.

Hey FJ,

I sent you guys another PM like 2 weeks ago, and a message in the affiliate homepage 4 days ago. How long do I have to wait to get a response?

That's about 0.06 BTC minimum bet, and you consider that small?
I feel like you made a mistake there, since I feel like a casino would have a lower minbet.

mOgliE is addressing a serious point that I have noticed in the past, but didn't want to comment on.

These images (which I see on twitter every few days as well) makes it look like it's really common for gamblers t owin huge amounts of money. In the description, it often says stuff like 'this guys showed us how to turn X amount of money into Y amount of money, which is often not true since most gamblers need to make a huge amount of bets before they even hit that big multiplier.

My question still remains unanswered.

I don't know the details of this situation, but to be honest, it would be stupid to give them their money back.
If that'd be the case, everyone can gamble huge, and if they win keep the money and if they lose complain to get the money back. That's not how it supposed to work. If you gamble online, you know the risks, and if you win you win and if you lose you lose.
Just my two cents.