Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 116 results by Jurek
Re: Hashkings Lending,Deposit 1.25% INSURED, ALL PPT ACCOUNTS CLOSING ON 8/19
Filling the SEC tip form atm http://www.sec.gov/about/forms/formtcr.pdf , hope it is the right one ;-) Glorious day!
I suggest all of you to do the same - especially US citizens.
I suggest all of you to do the same - especially US citizens.
Re: Hashkings Lending,Deposit 1.25% INSURED, ALL PPT ACCOUNTS CLOSING ON 8/19
+1
I'd agree on 20%, which would be around 300$. It was 150BTC.
Anyway here are all personal detailes of HK https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JOR8xssD8Ec9j_N3R4_MJapQoGALy5RBDTJdQZIrFlE/edit , ready to pass to SEC by someone fluent in english and not bad in US law.
I'd agree on 20%, which would be around 300$. It was 150BTC.
Anyway here are all personal detailes of HK https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JOR8xssD8Ec9j_N3R4_MJapQoGALy5RBDTJdQZIrFlE/edit , ready to pass to SEC by someone fluent in english and not bad in US law.
Re: Hashkings Lending,Deposit 1.25% INSURED, ALL PPT ACCOUNTS CLOSING ON 8/19
You are next HK http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370539730583#.Ue6vY411T2Z
Stand your ground is not going to protect you against the feds.
Stand your ground is not going to protect you against the feds.
Re: Hashkings Lending,Deposit 1.25% INSURED, ALL PPT ACCOUNTS CLOSING ON 8/19
Hell I would by happy if I got anything from that duche. I had 150 coins with HK, damn it HK give me at least 150$! It's all fun and games over the internet, I am honestly curious how you can live knowing how much legitimate, hard earned money you took from so many families in the USA and around the world.
This topic should be pinned, to show any idiot like we were to NOT TRUST ANYBODY EVER.
So much rage in this thread, what happend to "I've got 11 scary looking dudes in chicago"? Pussies..
HK, fuck you.
This topic should be pinned, to show any idiot like we were to NOT TRUST ANYBODY EVER.
So much rage in this thread, what happend to "I've got 11 scary looking dudes in chicago"? Pussies..
HK, fuck you.
Re: Hashkings Lending,Deposit 1.25% INSURED, ALL PPT ACCOUNTS CLOSING ON 8/19
Likewise, I'm willing to pay 500BTC to anyone who can help bring him to justice and recover at least half the BTC he owes.
If anyone manages to get Hashking to pay me what he owes me, I'll give you a bounty of 80BTC 
I'll pledge 100 BTC for recovering what Hashking owes me.
I'll also pledge 100 BTC.
Re: Hashkings Lending,Deposit 1.25% INSURED, ALL PPT ACCOUNTS CLOSING ON 8/19
Filling out http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/consumers/conscomp.pdf ...
Shareholders are not innocent. Look at it this way: At the time these contracts were launched it was common knowledge that mining, even with FPGA, was not going to be profitable for much longer. Note that is, if you mined yourself with a FPGA. So how did you expect to break even after paying someone a management fee?
ASIC upgrade + possible expansion using money gathered in IPO. Issuer's intention to screw his shareholders was never clear.Re: [BitFunder] ABM Mining Company [PGM is now CLOSED, final buyback occurred]
ABM shareholders I suggest you take a look at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=129941.msg1396972#msg1396972
I just want you to remember how pathetic you are when you buy your christmas tree with the money you stole.
Besides that I also want somebody who is in charge here (Theymos?) to decide wether word "shareholders" may or may not include the issuer if it is as laconic as in this case (original contract https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=97263.0). I don't think Paladon had in mind what the jackass here is pulling. I think he is using the situation, abusing the contract.
Besides that I also want somebody who is in charge here (Theymos?) to decide wether word "shareholders" may or may not include the issuer if it is as laconic as in this case (original contract https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=97263.0). I don't think Paladon had in mind what the jackass here is pulling. I think he is using the situation, abusing the contract.
Let me get this straight. At first you said "56 shares are owned by me ", but when it became obvious that you kept half of the investment to yourself while you should have given it back to the shareholders you picked exactly that moment to surprise us saying that actually YOU are the major shareholder, DESPITE the glbse was at the time DOWN, and despite data pulled from glbse showing that in fact these 573 shares were never sold!
What I don't understand is why this pathetic thief hasn't yet received the scammer tag? Looks like he is not going to admit his "calculus error".
It is just sad how desperatly you are trying to defened yourself, avoiding questions in this thread, rushing into dead ends ("the highest price in 15 days is 0 so you are lucky" shit).. Be a man and just admit you made a mistake, pay back what is NOT yours!
What I don't understand is why this pathetic thief hasn't yet received the scammer tag? Looks like he is not going to admit his "calculus error".
It is just sad how desperatly you are trying to defened yourself, avoiding questions in this thread, rushing into dead ends ("the highest price in 15 days is 0 so you are lucky" shit).. Be a man and just admit you made a mistake, pay back what is NOT yours!