Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 59 results by Kamoheapohea
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
As of today I would say this challenge is no longer solvable for any of us "normal" users.
So gmaxwell should reconsider the scope or withdraw all but the closest challenges.
This was never ment as a puzzle to solve but a rough estimate what current technology can crack.
We know now that the following challenges are only solvable by big players.
He should spread all remaining funds on the existing solvers (-30 bits) for being grateful on their participation.
The End.
So gmaxwell should reconsider the scope or withdraw all but the closest challenges.
This was never ment as a puzzle to solve but a rough estimate what current technology can crack.
We know now that the following challenges are only solvable by big players.
He should spread all remaining funds on the existing solvers (-30 bits) for being grateful on their participation.
The End.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
...
Unfortunately you are bad at making a point. I fail to understand what you are trying to say but with a high probability it is of no use. Sorry.
I say that the Kangaro algorithm is what it is thanks to the birthday paradox, and a slight modification changes everything, and that is what is currently being discussed here. They think that by modifying the software they make it faster and more efficient, but the reality is that they make it faster but less efficient.
WTF are you high? Why post the obvious?
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
...
Unfortunately you are bad at making a point. I fail to understand what you are trying to say but with a high probability it is of no use. Sorry.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
That's what I think, the kangaroo algorithm works, but you only get more efficiency with more computing power or a better implementation of secp256k1, there is no way to speed this up otherwise without making it less efficient.
So now that we know that gmaxwell created this puzzle. How should we continue? I think he should stop it.
What are you talk about ? Why stoped ? You realy think what people try to solve puzzles only with kangaroo and other old software ? Forum men er develop super lightening database because of puzzle, othe peoples do something another, and solving puzzles not stop. So, I think you need stop talk about sach shit.
COBRAS you speak such beautiful English. How could I resist answering you.
Please learn English or use the many translators available so that people no longer think you are mentally handicapped.
Yes, the methods you mentioned are the only methods used here. You are very smart boy. Well done.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
That's what I think, the kangaroo algorithm works, but you only get more efficiency with more computing power or a better implementation of secp256k1, there is no way to speed this up otherwise without making it less efficient.
So now that we know that gmaxwell created this puzzle. How should we continue? I think he should stop it.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
My post, that was not really useful, has been deleted without any good reason so I will post it again without any quotes.
With quotes there would be more context but well I don't care. I will post this until it won't get deleted anymore.
110 and 115 were solved with his software so it "works". I can imagine 125 and 130 were also solved with JLP base.
He worked for CERN so he should be used to good coding practices.
I myself, as an amateur coder, have a harder time to read JLP code compared to brichards bitcrack code.
With quotes there would be more context but well I don't care. I will post this until it won't get deleted anymore.
110 and 115 were solved with his software so it "works". I can imagine 125 and 130 were also solved with JLP base.
He worked for CERN so he should be used to good coding practices.
I myself, as an amateur coder, have a harder time to read JLP code compared to brichards bitcrack code.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
I have never needed to lie, so I just asked to look at the code, but your paranoia doesn’t let you be, bro. Keep going with your kangaroos, you might be close to something or not, it’s your problem. If you are right, you don’t need multiple accounts to validate yourself or sabotage. I don’t know what you’re talking about, I don’t know anything about programming in CUDA.
As far as I’m concerned, maybe Elon is another one of your multiple accounts, just like when you were ‘digaran’ and you fought with yourself.
He can go on with his kangaroos but it won't help him.
Some people here think they are smarter than professors in computer science that never found something better than kangaroo.
You cannot approach this without thousands of modern GPUs. This is no longer a puzzle (never has been). It is an arms race.
Why do people think they are smarter than studied people that spent many month with big brains on this topic?
Kangaroo cannot be optimized more than what you can find publicly.
Accept YOU won't crack 135bit with kangaroo.
Kangaroo cannot be optimized more than what you can find publicly.
Accept YOU won't crack 135bit with kangaroo.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
....a program that can't solve puzzle 130. 
So, think about it again. It’s not even intended for that. You can reduce the range to a smaller one. It’s written in bold: 'This program is limited to a 125-bit interval search.' Have you ever wondered why it's exactly 125? Why not 120, 128, or 135?
It's called bad coding / written in a hurry. I think 99% of everyone that used his application are not aware of all the bugs and general mess of the source code. A few here are defending it in godly ways as if JLP is some sort of a genius who discovered fire or something. In reality his code would not pass a first filter of QA.
110 and 115 were solved with his software so it "works". I can imagine 125 and 130 were also solved with JLP base.
He worked for CERN so he should be used to good coding practices.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Who buy me coffee for 3 months, I will reward with coffee, lunch, dinner for 7 days in Dubai 
Would send but I don't wanna go to dubai.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Current solver(s) just don't care about this thread. They have many, many GPUs and just take the BTC as a little bonus. Maybe they are criminal hackers.
Thanks to french idiot JLP for giving the sourcecode for free to all them.
Might be some chinese or north korean guys. Some place where energy costs nothing or maybe every GPU is hacked.
It is very unlikely that there is a new algorithm to solve the ECDLP. Else we might expect more frequent solves and maybe a new scientific paper.
It is game over for normal guys if you not find a real new approach to cracking the ECDLP.
Zielar had access to many GPUs but I doubt he had access to that many. But he might have solved it somehow anyway. He is a very greedy/selfish person who never gave anything back to JLP, brichard19 or others.
Thanks to french idiot JLP for giving the sourcecode for free to all them.
Might be some chinese or north korean guys. Some place where energy costs nothing or maybe every GPU is hacked.
It is very unlikely that there is a new algorithm to solve the ECDLP. Else we might expect more frequent solves and maybe a new scientific paper.
It is game over for normal guys if you not find a real new approach to cracking the ECDLP.
Zielar had access to many GPUs but I doubt he had access to that many. But he might have solved it somehow anyway. He is a very greedy/selfish person who never gave anything back to JLP, brichard19 or others.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Me too, I thought whoever found the private key would go through Mara's slipstream, that no one would dare go through mempool directly but how wrong I was.
The thief who stole the coins must have a nice setup, it took his bot 45 seconds to replace the transaction, I assume whether he used BSGS or Kangaroo, it took 30 seconds to find the private key and the remaining 15 seconds for opening and shutting down apps.
The thief who stole the coins must have a nice setup, it took his bot 45 seconds to replace the transaction, I assume whether he used BSGS or Kangaroo, it took 30 seconds to find the private key and the remaining 15 seconds for opening and shutting down apps.
kTimesG bragged about having a very fast setup and also started precalculating tames for 66bit, 67bit... Preparations you would only need if you plan to steal the transaction sitting in the mempool.
Every other user that took part in the stealing-bot-script discussions a few pages ago is suspicious.
The thief likely active here but would never confess because of repercussions...and well he is an asshole
.Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Read each addresses look like word to finder.
Yes they are mocking of the early solver and all of us.
What a pathetic message to send this way. Really big asshole vibes.
I hope the original creator will remove all addresses < 110bit(?) from the puzzle via a private transaction.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Oh I don't know how guilty I would feel as the thief. But unfortunately there are many assholes without a conscience.
I wish the real first finder a lot of strength and hope you don't do anything stupid. There are more important things than these few Bitcoin.
I wish the real first finder a lot of strength and hope you don't do anything stupid. There are more important things than these few Bitcoin.