Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 78 results by Kernel32
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Kozakcoin – the new cryptocurrency for Ukraine
by
Kernel32
on 01/05/2014, 08:31:43 UTC
Interesting stuff guys. Keep us up to date.
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: delete
by
Kernel32
on 28/03/2014, 21:00:00 UTC
...[Auroracoin] was just a random coin I picked that had yet to deploy KGW. It was simply a test platform for me.
...
~BCX~
If I'm not mistaken, you BCX, have the resources and knowledge to set up your own test platforms. Why  would you use a coin people care about and not your own?

Auroracoin and it's idea is one of those projects against political will, until the breaking point, where enough people gets educated and politicians need to obey as they should.
It is a wise thing to remain anonymous for the time being.

Sometimes you have to believe in someone. Give it a try. But risk accordingly.

I don't see why you should be the judge of what currency (lives or) dies along with some people dreams/scam.

Is there some?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Aphrodite Coin [APH] boost of Cyprus economy - JUST LAUNCHED!!!!!!
by
Kernel32
on 17/03/2014, 02:07:46 UTC
Hello

we just launched new pool!

http://aph.aurpool.com/

0.8% fee !

DDos protected !

:-)

location Europe!


5 coins auto payout & 0.1 transaction fee for manual payout seems a bit too much.


just set auto higher :-) we currently upgrade pool against ddos, many pools seem to suffer from it ...

unable connect to your pool.

There was a problem with wrong stratum listed. aph.aurpool.com instead of the real aphMINE.aurpool.com .

Got email from admins almost instantly after connect failure and 0% fee for life as apologize.

So I'm glad they had that glitch Cheesy
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Aphrodite Coin [APH] boost of Cyprus economy - JUST LAUNCHED!!!!!!
by
Kernel32
on 15/03/2014, 16:48:59 UTC
The goal should be to do the the Airdrop properly so Spaniards can create value by actually using it.

lol don't you mean Cypriots? or is it Icelanders, sorry my mistake, everyone knows this coin is for the Lakota tribe.

 Cheesy
¨

Yeah, thank you. Too many national coins lately  Cheesy
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Aphrodite Coin [APH] boost of Cyprus economy - JUST LAUNCHED!!!!!!
by
Kernel32
on 15/03/2014, 16:30:28 UTC
Update:

right now the community is not big enough, therefore the value of Aph cannot get big enough to help the cypriots, because 25 Aph per cypriot cannot help due to a low value. do you have any suggestions to push Aph?

What would you guys think about it? We have the idea that anybody here in the forum who will support aph will get some aph from the premine and the residual amount of aph will be donated for something good for Cyprus. That could push the value because you all get some APH even without mining and trying to support as much as you can.

Now its up to you guys, whats your idea about it. We will collect your ideas and at the end the most ideas will be executed.

We could follow our idea or we try something different - what do you think about it?

It is just an idea to make this coin more successful and help this beautiful country. We will not make any decision without asking the community before! Let us know your thoughts...

just get it on coinmarketcap and big exchanges, if you even touch the premine people will dump. the premine is sacred

+1

Speculative value to date is totally unimportant.

The goal should be to do the the Airdrop properly so Cypriots can create value by actually using it.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][SPA] SpainCoin: freedom for Spain, launch is *TODAY* 8pm GMT+1
by
Kernel32
on 12/03/2014, 17:15:41 UTC

I'm glad to announce both SpainPool net pool and team is up and ready.

Registrations are open, sign up now.

Server parameters:
  • Secure Tier III+ load servers
  • DDoS Web protection - powered by network of 24 data centers around the world
  • 24/7 admin/monitoring
  • Fee 0.8%

Quick settings:
--scrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.spainpool.net:3333 -u Weblogin.Worker -p Worker password
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Selling info worth of thousands.
by
Kernel32
on 23/02/2014, 12:24:26 UTC
I must say, it is very interesting info and the opportunity to earn big time is still there.
However there is some risk involved, certainty worth it for me.
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: hrvatskafarma Reputatation Thread
by
Kernel32
on 16/02/2014, 18:21:02 UTC
I'm going to give MyFarm a try.
Greetings to Hrvatsko¨

UPDATE: 12 hours left and rig is listed as OFF and not mining for some time now.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [PRE-ANN][MAX] MaxCoin
by
Kernel32
on 07/02/2014, 16:14:02 UTC

Yeah bro, but then I'm getting this message:

Quote
Error: blob is too big

Do you have the dmg? Would you mind uploading it?

Here you are; MaxCoin-QT.dmg from github archive:
https://mega.co.nz/#!uAFkGYAL!oNEbS3GHRxVwTHSpTU8BjsBv4-lU_0HeGnccSmQ1A1k

Doses anyone know weather I lost my MaxCoins, when a generated new wallet address by "maxcoind getnewaddress", without the "account01" part and sent them there? The address doesnt show up by typing "listaddressgroupings".

Thanks for help and be warned in case this is permanent!
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
Kernel32
on 30/11/2013, 17:03:13 UTC
Same here ...
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.5 BTC=67GH/s Per Share 7/30 shares left Updated
by
Kernel32
on 24/09/2013, 19:47:27 UTC
Hi Larry,

would like to join you on a venture once again.

Payment for 2 shares sent: https://blockchain.info/tx/92948820d35a00823ad2b5c4b40cea19ee54e45703ba240d4564ed81d276f6e7

Thank you so far,
Kernel
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Why the Bitcoin community HAS to save the network from HashFast, CoinTerra, BFL.
by
Kernel32
on 21/09/2013, 11:13:34 UTC
Thank you OurASIC and all above for bringing community sourced ASICs back to foreground.

The most important thing is having a vision and transform it into real, viable plan. The discussion is already lit up. That's the best way to get there.

We might argue if a company is evil or not when trying to max profit at free market while staying in compliance with law. But that's not the important bit.

The most important question that enables us to forge viable plan: What is our advantage as a community over a "evil" company?

As many of you suggested above, market does apply to a community project same as commercial one. (People wouldn't buy community ASIC when there is better commercial deal.) So, let's see what community can do better than a commercial start-up.

Personally, I think our biggest advantage is being able to take the time to develop as good as it gets. A ASIC commercial company needs to make profit as soon as possible. Their chips could be twice (maybe more) as good, but the capital they use is not their own and expenses on keeping investment grow in time. They have to make some fiat profit fast.

The second big advantage (still my personal opinions) is community funding "as seen on Kickstarter". I would give my money to open community project where I know where my money goes, whats the state of it and the "never done before" goal we share. Where having it stuck as pre-order at some company is scary. My money could be on their way to Bahamas already.

And the third is the brains. A commercial company can offer money to developers, and then throw them away when they done their job. We can offer money too, but on top of that, well ... Companies come and go. ... We as a community are here to stay as long as there is math and some kind of money in the world.

What do you think is our advantage(s) if any?
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
by
Kernel32
on 16/06/2013, 13:50:19 UTC
FWIW I've paid for an order of chips and have requested developer chips and reference docs. When I get those I will post the docs here and then send the chips to whichever dev's have the community's support and can put the time into actually producing an actual working board.

*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase. I've done my risk assessment and think this is a good commercial opportunity. If you disagree with that then please keep it to yourself.
flowdab, you took quite a risk, but it could pay off.

Until developers have sample chips/documentation and are sure they can design a working board (or at least one of the lead developers is) it's too risky for the majority of potential group buyers (including myself).

We'll see pretty soon whether BFL is really willing to deliver sample chips/docs or it was just marketing move to sell as much useless chips as possible. Speaking of useless chips...


.......
I am worried that BFL is going to send us the defunct lot they are using right now instead of the brand new lot that will be baked at the Fab. I don't want yesterdays revision that has caused so many problems (let them deal with those). I want the latest revision fresh from the Fab.
......
Could you get in contact with BFL and clarify this point?

Although we should be able to find out what revision and quality the chips are during random hash test (prior to escrow release), this is still a very important matter to look into. Thank you for pointing this out. Let you know as soon as there is some reply from BFL.

Credit program will be incorporated into the group buy?

I didn't discuss credit program options with Josh yet, but it should be incorporated. I see no obstacles there.

Thank you for the support guys. Stay tuned.
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
by
Kernel32
on 11/06/2013, 22:56:05 UTC
We received BFL reaction regarding sample chips request and hash test of produced chips before escrow release possibilities.

Quote
I can provide you with sample chips prior to the chip purchase, yes. It would obviously be a limited number of chips, but we can certainly spare a few of course.

How are you proposing to do the random chip selection hash test prior to release?  In principal I don't have a problem with this, however there are some practical pitfalls here, chiefly what if you don't have boards or a test rig ready to do a proper test of the chips, do we then wait until you are ready?  

I hope to have the reference documentation done this week.  We are pretty time crunched getting the singles and MR ready to ship, which should also start this week.  Once that starts rolling we can focus more on the technical documents.  

By now, I'm sure you've seen the new pricing and the fact that the chips will be shipped as a mixed lot, so it probably renders your final question invalid.  If not, let me know.


I'm glad BFL agreed on shipping 65 nm chip samples to community mining board devs.

If developers get chips and quality documentation (*might* be even this week), they would be able to estimate board design/prototyping period(/feasibility). That is crucial info to have before actually opening the group buy.

Sample chips distribution is my top priority right now.

BFL also agrees on HASH test prior to escrow release. I would like them to make few Short Boards (Jalapenos) available for testing. (If there is no 65 nm community mining board at hand already.)

Mixed lot structure:
- 60% Grade A (16 engines - equals to 4.00 GH/s)
- 20% Grade B (15 engines - equals to 3.75 GH/s)
- 15% Grade C (14 engines - equals to 3.50 GH/s)
- 5% Grade D (no less than 12 engines - equals to no less than 3.00 GH/s)

Clock rate (speed) of engines is between 250 and 294 mhz. That means about +/- 7,5% individual hash rate fluctuations. Price for 60/20/15/5 quality lot is $75/chip.

I have yet to find out whether Grade of the chip is known prior to usage (Group Buyers would be compensated for buying lower quality chips) or not (lottery style).

I get quite a lot of PM's of people asking how to join the Group Buy. Please notice, we are still in preparation phase. Making sure our deal with BFL is safe and sweet.

Some also asked about shipping/VAT, whether this is a US/EU/Asia based group. Well, this is international group. All of the chips will be sent from warehouse in California directly to costumers/chosen board manufacturers with possibility of merged shipment to EU.

Thank you so far. I'll keep you posted.
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
by
Kernel32
on 08/06/2013, 15:06:59 UTC

I thought it was more board design problems than getting them made, but dont want to troll so...

You are most likely right. Manufacturing should be easy while having a good design.


Almost all of the talk in burnin and bkk's threads is over my head but they seem like very smart people, who I would have confidence in to get them working and in production fairly quickly.

That presents the problem, avalon can sell chips because they aren't making any more hardware. If BFL release all the details needed and the guys above get a board working it would surely decimate BFL's order queue.

So what is their reasoning ?

...........

I think they are sick of the design problems. I truly believe they did not picture nor intended this to happen.

The easy solution to make somebody else overtake board design and convert most of the pre-orders to chip sales seems probably very appealing to BFL right now.

They could come up with a motivation instrument for pre-order costumers. For example chip discount. That could make the magic happen, giving the fact those costumers are still interested in mining by not getting refunded already.

Butterflies would most likely also manufacture devices based on community board design. Or move to Bahamas finally. Who knows.


Please note, that most of this is only my wild speculation.
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
by
Kernel32
on 08/06/2013, 12:34:49 UTC
I would start work on a custom BFL-chip board once i'm done with the Avalon development.
(I am sure can recycle some design aspects which should speed things up)
But It would need encouraging news from them that indicate that we can really expect them to deliver + documentation on the chips.

Thank you burnin very much for taking the time.

We have now two lead community developers - burnin and Chris (Klondike) - to consider BFL chip board. Under some conditions of course. We may have the power to make this happen. (Or not.)


...........
Seriously guys. Have a little bit of self-respect at least.

We are the first to actually negotiate with BFL. That indicates BTC community is not a bunch of idiots to throw money at them with no guarantees at all. I see a lot of self-respect in that.

In business world, you don't make deals according to your feelings. You take advantage of the best available on the market and take maximal possible precautions. I'm not responsible for their previous costumers that took lesser precautions.

The truth is BFL may have the best chip technology - they invested a lot of money in their chip (maybe too much), no doubt at all.

They can't handle the board manufacturing and that's where community can take over and profit. That is a business opportunity to me.


........ and now we accept we will never get our Singles, Mini Singles and Mini Rigs.

Don't accept it and get your money and self-respect back. You kind of support what BFL does by not making so.

Another scam
 Angry
Seriously man, did you read any part of this thread? Can you explain why do you think this is a scam 67152398 ?

It's a good thing to be careful, but c'mon we have John (not the same person as Josh Wink ) .

BFL itself is the scam, get real.

Zero products shipped from the revised BitForce line (Jalepenos are older and no longer offered, Little SC was supposed to replace it, none have shipped at all in over one year)

Now offering chips that are just as much vaporware as their ghost machines

And they are apparently wasting time on their own charity thing?

BFL and all of their cronies earned a scammer tag here, that should be enough to kill this thread right here and now.

C'mon man. BFL does not manufacture the chip. You really think they are producing 65 nm chips by themselves? They have only licence to resell it. With 100% escrow I don't see any problem in that.

I'm not willing to (group)buy any boards/devices made at BFL.


So I haven't been following all of the BFL drama over the past however long, but I have another concern that might be of note to this group buy.

We know that they have actual chips that work, they've shipped (a few) Jalapenos. But from what I've seen of the tear down of these devices they have 2 working chips on a board designed to house 8 chips, with a pretty beefy heatsink and fan on those two chips. They've stated they missed their power numbers, and thereby the chips run hotter than they intended. Is it possible (me not being much more than a hardware layman) that these chips run too hot for any reasonable cluster size on a PCB?

If so, then BFL could ship the chips, fully complying with the terms of the group buy, and have the money released from escrow, only to have the buyers holding chips that overheat constantly and have to be throttled or have fewer chips placed per board than intended. I think it was a surprise to a lot of people (myself included) that Josh agreed to the full escrow deal. Maybe this is why? They have a ton of chips and can only use a few per board? It would only make sense to sell them and get all the money they could out of their (our) investment at that point.

That would certainly explain why they have not released the Singles or Mini-rig prototypes. Those are supposed to be densely populated boards. Perhaps the chips cannot be kept cool. Very hard to say until they release specs and samples.

Exactly. I might suggest to the group buy that previous to the escrow being released they are able to test a fully populated board with sample chips that are running at full speed and on all cores in order to be able to see how much heat they're putting out and work out a suitable cooling solution if one exists.

Fisrt of all, love your avatar nave. Secondly, this is a fruitful discussion I was hoping for to see here. Thank you guys (and also to others discussing and expressing support).

It seems the 65 nm chips are generating a lot more heat, than BFL expected. Where being unable to put 8pcs of 4 GH/s chips on few square inch board may discard some cute-black-box designs, for most of BTC miners the size of the board is not as crucial. (Remember GPU rigs?) They are not to keep on the desk anyways. Community developers need to reestablish what "fully populated board" means. I'm pretty sure the hash/board-square-inch  ratio would be still noticeably better than 110 nm Avalon's. My best guess is twice (as 65 nm chip consumes twice less power).

Is anyone here able to measure his Jalapeno heat parameters?
For example putting it into polystyrene box and measuring temperature over time. Maybe start with low temperature and don't go too high. Remember, it was manufactured by BFL. Wink
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Klondike - 16 chip ASIC Open Source Board - Preliminary
by
Kernel32
on 07/06/2013, 12:36:02 UTC
Dudes... PM stuff to him about BFL. Stop cluttering the thread!

This is for development of the Klondike boards not questions about BFL chip group buys. Such a snaky way to plug BFL crap in this thread stop it.

My apologies for the OT. I aim to stop the BFL crap using our GB deal and 100% escrow leverage.

(I was only asking Chris if he would be interested in 65 nm chip board developement/sample chips/docs. We communicate through PMs now.)
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
by
Kernel32
on 07/06/2013, 12:17:24 UTC
Another scam
 Angry
Seriously man, did you read any part of this thread? Can you explain why do you think this is a scam 67152398 ?

It's a good thing to be careful, but c'mon we have John (not the same person as Josh Wink ) .
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
by
Kernel32
on 07/06/2013, 11:42:23 UTC

The promise is there:
Quote
We are going to be releasing the specs and reference board designs, so someone will develop their own firmware.

Josh 06-06-2013 06:20 PM in Shoutbox.
But when, who knows.

I wrote another email to Josh as follows:

Quote
Hi Josh,

Thank you for your answer.

John K. already expressed his good will to do the escrow.

Where I can't get you any hard number on how many chips we will buy, it's certain that the community is willing to invest a lot in this.

To get the most interesting deal possible and all of the potential/undecided costumers involved, you could give them some guarantees, that way they can put any doubts behind. Could we agree on random chip selection hash test attended by our representative before escrow release? Community based board development is also a very good motivation. Are you able to arrange sample chips (even with only some cores working) and chip documentation delivery to (2-3) community lead developers in let's say two weeks?

As the the number of chips could be pretty high, let me please know what proportions of grade A, B, C .. chips are most beneficial for your company.

Thank you Josh,
Kernel32
BitcoinTalk.org community member

Two weeks to get the samples to developers. Sounds fair?

Let's see what happens next. Stay tuned guys.
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
by
Kernel32
on 07/06/2013, 10:53:57 UTC
As Chris/BkkCoins (Klondike board developer) in our communication stated:

Quote
If they (BFL) manage to ship real chips I'll be surprised and if they put out a chip spec doc I'll have a look to see if I could design a board for it, but for now I'm working on this one (Avalon )and hoping that Avalon actually does ship samples in a week or two.

Chris.

I say let's get hands of developers on BFL sample chips (and docs) in two weeks same as Avalon.