Open ports 8884 and 8885 in your Firewall for the bitcoinplus-qt application to use.
Then try to save the following IPs to your bitcoinplus.conf file:

addnode=102.182.49.103
addnode=136.34.173.174
addnode=141.134.66.172
addnode=157.90.88.178
addnode=157.90.89.105
addnode=169.150.204.39
addnode=182.232.129.239
addnode=192.143.16.154
addnode=192.143.25.167
addnode=192.143.88.52
addnode=192.162.140.56
addnode=193.108.117.179
addnode=193.108.117.181
addnode=193.164.140.87
addnode=195.200.244.73
addnode=197.210.52.32
addnode=197.210.53.225
addnode=197.210.53.85
addnode=197.210.77.14
addnode=31.145.99.149
addnode=34.216.151.6
addnode=37.19.211.118
addnode=49.230.5.196
addnode=50.220.121.211
addnode=73.247.138.101
addnode=79.40.93.194
addnode=81.197.109.44
addnode=85.19.25.38
addnode=85.76.48.185
addnode=85.76.48.188
addnode=92.239.1.181
addnode=92.58.111.32
addnode=93.144.16.154
addnode=94.130.9.100
addnode=95.105.180.42
addnode=95.181.238.107
addnode=95.181.238.18
addnode=95.217.78.168
addnode=98.45.131.36
addnode=165.22.87.209
addnode=222.240.106.222
addnode=46.151.159.53
addnode=86.173.238.125
addnode=95.248.105.106

And start application again, you should get connections then.

Oh my god, seems like the block explorer went down:
http://block.bitcoinplus.org/
https://block.bitcoinplus.org/
Or is it just a problem caused by an expired authentication certificate?
(the browser states "connection is unsafe")

Promoting the ATLANT scam while at the same time chosing the nickname "scambust" LOL, give me a break
Say about BTCDrak whatever you want, at least he was never promoting such useless, blatantly obvious bullcrap.

I'm rather a sheep than a scammer

Yes, Romano is the BEST dev !!
There definitely is no better dev than him out there

If Polo trollbox wouldn't have been disabled, Viacoin would likely be valued $3 already.
Because the word "VIA" or "Viacoin" would probably have been mentioned a thousand times in the trollbox, over the last couple months.
And only a couple hundred investors more, would have made all the difference, that's for sure.
Blame Polo for that.
Looks like all the weak hands are now shaken out from Viacoin.

In case the rumours are true about the crypto-exchange ban in China, we will probably never see VIA traded at YOBTC.
Maybe we should focus on getting VIA listed on as many additional exchanges as possible, preferably those which generate consistent volume.

We could try getting Viacoin listed on Kraken, HitBTC, Livecoin, Liqui, Bitsane, Bleutrade, CoinExchange and BX Thailand.
C-Cex could be a waste of funds, as they are known for delisting coins with too low volume relatively fast.
These exchanges could potentially be open-minded for listing Viacoin, as they already have many dozens of markets listed, as you can see here:

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/kraken/
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/hitbtc/
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/livecoin/
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/liqui/
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/bitsane/
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/bleutrade/
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/coinexchange/
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/bx-thailand/

Even getting VIA listed on just half of them, could help with some additional daily volume coming in.

A listing on southkorean Bithumb or japanese Coincheck would bring in the most volume, but will be difficult if not outright impossible to get VIA listed there,
as they so far only have a few markets of the big, major coins that have high market-caps.

China cryptoexchange ban coming?

Is any reliable info already out ??

I wonder why now another cryptocurrency is appearing, founded by some crap Corporation,
which also intends to use the same ticker symbol "VIA" !

It's called xviata (VIA) and listed at the bottom of the C-Cex exchange voting list:

https://c-cex.com/?id=vote

Their homepage is:

https://xviata.com/en/

What in God's name is going on here ?? Like WTF !!?

These motherfuckers gonna steal Viacoins ticker symbol !

Anybody has a clue, why on Yobtc VIA market, it is mentioned total amount of coins: 92million ??

https://www.yobtc.com/trade/coincenter.shtml?coinId=47

HOLY CRAP !!!!

Just as i predicted guys, sooner or later the MOTHER OF ALL Otoh pumps incoming...

Another chinese exchange with Polo-like volume for some alts is:
https://szzc.com/

The chinese usually demand bribery money for listing small coins.
Maybe its time to establish a token-based voting system in VIA where the owners of coins can vote for or against proposals (like in Dash), but rather having their vote weighted by the balance of their accounts,
if the tokens are still there when proposal deadline ends.
(exchange accounts or tokens which are in the property of exchanges should however be denied any voting powers, and for various reasons)

We really should think about introducing a constant, self-sustaining funding mechanism in VIA, by creating a VIA treasury fund.
It could be done by introducing a tax on miners, about say 20%. This way miners would receive 80% and the treasury 20% of the block reward.
If need be, we could extend maximum supply size to 25,000,000 or even 30,000,000 coins (or something in-between), and thereby increasing block reward, so the miners wouldn't get hurt too much.
Indirectly miners would profit too, by price increases related to a well-funded treasury able to fund the forthcoming of the project in many ways.

95% of all the coins suffer badly from lack of funding, because ultimately every third-party implementation or integration costs a lot of money.
But many projects seem not to realize or simply deny it...
Not to mention the urgently needed bribe money to buy away most resistance, wherever encountered.

Jonesd already said real VIA value = 300k
Therefore VIA is still extremely undervalued...
[/quote]

Who is jonesd ?
[/quote]

He is a VIA whale

All it gonna need is styx, then immediately 300k
Mark my words, Homie

Jonesd already said real VIA value = 300k
Therefore VIA is still extremely undervalued...

VIA HERE WE GO !!!!

A common reason for 2FA auth failures (wrong codes) is,
because it only generates the correct codes if the DATE, TIMEZONE and TIME on your mobile device is accurate.

Try the following:
Go under the "settings" section of your mobile phone, under DATE/TIME settings.
Then check the checkbox that says "Synchronize date/time from the network provider / telecommunication operator".
After having checked this checkbox, the DATE & TIME of your mobile device should be OK. (as long as you have network signal)

Then it should also generate VALID auth codes, when you try them again, they should work.
If the time on your mobile phone is off only by 1-3 minutes, it can/will generate wrong auth codes, which are invalid.
Let me know if this worked out for you.

People need to FREAKIN STOP SPAMMING POLONIEX SUPPORT TICKET SYSTEM with their PEANUTS-RELATED BULLSHIT !!!!
And start realizing they bring their support ticket system to its knees.
Poloniex got buried in tens of thousands of support tickets, 90% of them probably related to deposit and withdrawal amounts of less than $50.

Real investors and real traders who want to do some serious trading (amounts greater than 1,000 USD) are suffering because of this shit,
as they need to wait just as long for having their support tickets processed. And they incurr much higher time-related risks and possible losses due to delays.

I wish Poloniex would simply FREAKIN BAN and/or IGNORE all traders who keep less than 1,000 USD balance or make deposits which are significantly less than that.
90% of traders there who probably account for 1% of trading volume (combined) are bringing Poloniex to its knees with all their stupid mistakes and all their bullshit.

At the VERY LEAST, Poloniex should priorize the processing of the support tickets based on each account worth at present (or peak account worth within the last 3-6 months).
Poloniex, if you are reading this: IT'S LONG OVERDUE TO PRIORIZE THE SUPPORT TICKETS ACCORDING TO ACCOUNT VALUE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chances are that (at least) one of your customers denounced you @Coinpayments for some type of misbehaviour or broken promises.

Furthermore, unless the jurisdiction you are residing in, isn't a third world country,
chances are that you are technically breaking the law by accepting other people's money for engaging in trading activities.
(unless you are officially a "professional money advisor/consultant" or "professional investing/trading business relying on investors capital",
registered with the district court/chamber of commerce or other authorities/agencies depending on your jurisdiction)

Most civilized countries simply require such a registration, to halt and discourage frauds and scams perpetrated by thiefs and con-artists,
as they are usually reluctant to reveal their name and true identity by registering (if they have intention to steal from their customers),
and thereby offer some protection to their population.
Some countries like the U.S. may even require your customers to have an "accredited investor" status, depending on the securities or the
level of risk involved in trading those securities on their behalf.

However, if you have not committed any wrongdoing and always acted in "good faith" and in the best interest of your customers, i agree
that Coinpayments shouldn't have frozen any funds, but rather asked for an interview or conversation, in order to evaluate the situation.
If they refuse to work with you in future, i agree that they should have given you a warning or a time-frame until when they will close your
account with them, but at least process the last transaction/s. (as long as there are no strong reasons not to)

So when will we hit 23million?
And what happens next? Hashrate down to almost zero?

Looks like somebody forgot to pay Wang Chung
Can it be any more obvious?

As soon as VIA activate SegWit, i expect the MOTHER OF ALL Otoh pumps incoming
If not, i'm gonna jump out of the window!! LOL