Alright... can you increase the minimum difficulty to 128? WestHash/NiceHash won't let me connect to the pool. It's saying minimum diff is 16 and it needs to be 128 for them to connect. I'm connecting to the EU server. Or let us set minimum diff per worker?
You already can set a minimum difficulty for each worker.
There's no problem, that's what the network difficulty is. Per your screen shot you are hashing to difficulty 32, pool difficulty, every hash you hash that results in a solution with difficulty greater than 32 should be accepted. You're using a way out dated version of cgminer. 4.9.1 is current, try a new version maybe?
I downloaded the version you said, but when I double click on start-BTC it disapear quickly I tried the "--scrypt" thing it didn't work so I clicked on cgminer directly now I have a cmd window with "Stratum from pool 0 detected new block", is that normal even my dashboard on the pool websites isn't showing anything?
Scrypt support was removed from the official cgminer so you won't get any help for it in this thread.
I just enabled it now. Thanks for pointing it out that IPv6 wasn't working!
Sweet. I've got my miner pointed at the direct IPv6 address with the backup1 server for failover just in case. I'm always looking for new ways to get some use out of my IPv6 connection; I think I'm using it for a majority of my traffic now.
EDIT: 0.02% reject rate after 13 hours. I'd say it's working pretty well.
Assuming I configured things right, this should now work. mmpool.org now as an IPv6 DNS entry. I tested with the direct IPv6 address as well: 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe84:db84. Let me know if there's a problem.
Oh nice, I'm seeing that now. Did you just add that or has it been enabled for a while?
A while back the pool used to support connecting and mining via cjdns. cjdns is described as:
Quote
Cjdns implements an encrypted IPv6 network using public-key cryptography for address allocation and a distributed hash table for routing. This provides near-zero-configuration networking, and prevents many of the security and scalability issues that plague existing networks.
I've re-enabled this for testing purposes as another backup in case mmpool.org is attacked or down. It should provide better performance than the tor hidden service option but it isn't intended for anonymity.
So this is basically just another way of tunneling IPv6 traffic over IPv4? Will you be adding native IPv6 for those of us that already have it?
just a quick question once i have more then a few miners pointing toward mmpool i get massive rejects it seems to be based on amount of hash per my user account once i get over 15th/s i have major issues just had to send 40 th/s elsewhere cause getting 70% rejects or more
Are you adjusting your difficulty accordingly? With 40TH/s, you should be using around 56,000 difficulty.
Explain what you think is wrong with it. I'm looking at it right now and I don't see anything. No, I haven't done the math myself, but I trust people smarter than myself that have. Meni Rosenfeld and organofcorti are a lot more credible than that moron conspiracy theorist.
Post
Topic
BoardPools
Re: [1600Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining|
Rough calculations show the last 30 blocks have accumulated a DGM surplus of well over 20 BTC. So not only is the daily DGM reward paying at a much lower than market value, the miners are also being denied access that forever growing surplus.
The miners will have access to that surplus if a stretch of bad luck blocks is hit. Have you done any actual math that proves people are getting cheated? No, of course not, you're just speculating based on numbers that you pull out of thin air.
Post
Topic
BoardPools
Re: [1600Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining|
How much does 30+ thash earn per day in your world ?
The current payout is 26.68252446 BTC. Since my initial post revealing this on December 4, the DGM reward has increased by only 0.07395845 BTC. Your pool's 32 thash should have earned 0.402 BTC PER DAY during that same time period.
Please elaborate on what your noob ass finds accpectable about this.
DGM works by paying out less on short rounds and more on long rounds. The longer the round, the slower the reward increases. This is perfectly "accpectable."