Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 88 results by Lambowei
⭐ Merited by Vod (1)
I'm wrong about little things, but not about Big Bang being wrong.
That's your fanatic religious belief, not a fact.
BB for itself is useless because it destroys itself. Hawking probably recognized this all along, but was paid to do the work... so he did it.
Some blabber about a conspiracy theory.
Scientists cannot prove that the God didn't create the universe.
And you can't prove that the universe didn't come from a monkey's ass. Sorry, but your lack of logic is appalling.
Read Hawkings last writings about Big Bang. He doesn't say it right out
So you're wrong. And you're not bright enough to understand him anyway, let's be honest.
God is real, as proven by science... which He made.
That's not what scientists say. That's what religious zealots say.
Since nobody can think about everything, either in pieces or as a whole, how in the world will anyone ever be able to think about something that is outside of the universe? Or how would anyone KNOW that there isn't something outside the universe?
The universe is everything by definition. Thus talking about something "outside the universe" is just nonsense.
Since everything has a cause, and even the idea that something might not have a cause has a cause, what is the cause of the universe? Even Hawking, in some of his final writings, says that there was a cause that caused the universe.
You say everything has a cause, but that's your belief, it's not science.
Before the universe existed, something was there that gave the universe its existence. We can say "before," because "after" the creation there was time. So, we can say before, because time exists now, after, and we are within that time, saying "before."
You say "before the universe existed", but there's no before the existence of the universe because from what we know time was created with the universe. Thus you're just using bullshit arguments to "demonstrate" your religious nonsensical belief.
Playing with the Jesus-idea is not relevant to the idea of atheism. "Jesus" is an idea that comes after there is understanding of the existence of God. You might as well say Pete, or Sam, or Joe if you don't understand that God exists. So, why bring Jesus into it?... except that you naturally know that God exists?
You're playing down it, but your bs religion is full of bullshit, like bushes in fire that talk to people and zombies that are the saviour.
You're unusually slow today? Outside the universe, it was something made up of cause without internal effect. It caused the universe, as an experiment, to see what effect was like.
Your logic is broken. Causality doesn't work like you're describing, it's a physical concept. You're generalizing the concept, and then not checking the generalization (because you can't). That's just not scientific, whatever you may think.
From what we know, there was just no time as a concept at the start of the universe, so there's no point in trying to talk about causality as we understand it.
Also, you talk about "outside the universe" but that's anti-scientific crap: the universe is the concept of everything from the scientific perspective, so if there was something "outside" the universe, it wouldn't be out but part of the universe.
Anyway, of course you won't understand anything of what I'm saying. It's in your religious interest to reach your preconceived "truth", your archaic belief about a zombie jesus etc.
God is loving. You don't have to be so scared of Him that you try to wish Him out of existence like that.
You're like a child that doesn't know yet that santa claus and the three wise men are your parents. You believe in god, but that's just another absurd belief. So I don't need to wish anyone out here, you are wishing god actually existed. You talk to yourself and think you're talking to god. You believe there's something after death and when you get there you'll just get worms into your skull honestly. You better take full advantage of this life and stop the bullshit because from what we actually know there ain't any other life afterwards.
Re: LAMBOWEI.COM | Interactive art on the blockchain, EARN X2 THIS CHRISTMAS!
Interesting.
Is this over already?
I guess participants will need to be good artists to participate... or is anyone qualified to join to work on available projects? And what happens if someone pays and paint where shouldn't be painted on? Do you have standard or rules everyone will need to follow.
I guess you will need permission from the owners of the images before selling.
Is this over already?
I guess participants will need to be good artists to participate... or is anyone qualified to join to work on available projects? And what happens if someone pays and paint where shouldn't be painted on? Do you have standard or rules everyone will need to follow.
I guess you will need permission from the owners of the images before selling.
Hi Ucy, this is not over. There's also no standard or rules, the rule of law is the contract. You don't need permission from the owners, it's easier than that: next bidder will have to send 24 Eth so I'm guessing that the bidder will think carefully about what image to send.
With that kind of thinking we would still be living in caves, wet, hungry and waiting for Gods of light, fire, and rain to do stuff for us.
I'll add that it's either very hypocritical or just plain stupid of philipma1957 to use the internet and his computer to post such a message, given that computers and the internet are build exclusively based on scientific principles.
It matters not: these discussions serve another benefit to my own education. Refinement of philosophical understanding comes much more easily when you have someone to discuss them with, and given BADecker's eagerness thereof, I consider him a fairly apt partner for this purpose.
However, with BADecker, you're just arguing alone against a wall of nonsense. This guy believes a book like Harry Potter is the gospel of truth.
It is also important to understand that God is everywhere and in everything.
There's nothing to "understand" about god, because there's no proof on whether it exists or not. The verb you should be using is "believe", not "understand".