To save time, here are some of the issues Pathfund wants to eliminate:
1. Insufficient Funding
2. Problems in gaining trust of the investors
3. limited reach and marketing
4. no guidance and therefore unable to decide the next step
5. no access to consultant or advisory from expert
6. no connection with marketing agencies and reputable personas of influence in crypto-space.
For me, this is enough to convince me to invest and believe in this project.
You may have enumerate all the possible issues that this project wants to address.
However, what is the reason that they are employing brand new accounts just to make positive post on them?
Did they say something on TG to comment on this thread?
If they have confidence about the capability of their platform, there's no need for these new accounts to vouch for them.
Also, it is better if the endorsement comes from higher rank members rather than fresh accounts.
We will know the if they can deliver, once they are active in operations.
Hello MrHunterx, you are the 3rd senior member i’m replying to today (and most probably my last, due to i’m not getting paid to reply contrary to senior members belief). I strongly believe that Path did not “employ brand new accounts just to make positive posts on this thread. The positive posts are believers of the project and Path cannot control who comments here. Neither can they stop me from replying to comments here. Since I am new in bitcointalk, is it really very negative when newbies post? Isn’t that not fair? No shade here, just really curious about it as 3 senior members already had put down the newbies here. Thank you if you can give enlightenment.