Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 311 results by Loco1887
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Floki vs. Beam: Which is the Better Investment Right Now?
by
Loco1887
on 19/12/2024, 07:00:06 UTC
Hi Everyone,

I’m currently exploring potential investments in the crypto market and am torn between Floki (FLOKI) and Beam (BEAM). These two projects cater to very different niches, and I’m hoping to get some insights from this community on their pros and cons.

Floki (FLOKI):

   •   Meme coin with a strong community and branding tied to Elon Musk’s dog.
   •   Ecosystem includes NFTs, DeFi tools, and a metaverse project called Valhalla.
   •   High-risk, high-reward potential but limited practical use cases.

Beam (BEAM):

   •   Privacy-focused cryptocurrency built on the Mimblewimble protocol.
   •   Offers strong anonymity features for secure transactions.
   •   Competes with established privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

What I’m Considering:

   •   Floki seems like a speculative opportunity that could explode with market hype, but it’s very volatile.
   •   Beam appeals to me for its real-world utility and focus on privacy, but it’s less talked about and might take longer to gain traction.

Questions for the Community:
   1.   Have you invested in either Floki or Beam? What has your experience been like?
   2.   Which do you think has more potential in the current market conditions?
   3.   Are there other projects similar to Beam or Floki that I should consider?

Looking forward to your thoughts and opinions. Thanks in advance for helping me out!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: BEAM vs SuperVerse
by
Loco1887
on 17/12/2024, 22:02:01 UTC
Any more opinions?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: BEAM vs SuperVerse
by
Loco1887
on 05/12/2024, 10:10:17 UTC
Hey everyone, I was hoping to get more thoughts on this! With the market potentially rotating towards gaming and NFTs, SuperVerse seems like it could be a strong pick for long-term gains. But then again, BEAM’s focus on privacy might hold solid value as more people look for secure and anonymous transactions.

What’s your take? Which project do you think has more potential for growth in 2024?

Governments & banks don’t like anonymity, and it also affects the policies that CEXs must adhere to. Monero is one of the victims of this sensitivity, affecting its price in the market. From what happened with Monero, I don't think there is any room for anonymity anymore, so out of the 2 projects you have above, I prefer SuperVerse.

Wasn't into Monero myself but heard about its struggle - truly unfortunate that it's persecuted like that.
I do agree with you, as most of the time CEXes are go-to places for people to do something on the market.

Thanks for your response!

You raise a good point about the challenges privacy coins like BEAM face. For SuperVerse, do you think it has what it takes to stand out in the crowded NFT/gaming space?

Also, do you feel most people favor SuperVerse over BEAM, or is opinion still divided? Would love to hear your thoughts!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: BEAM vs SuperVerse
by
Loco1887
on 05/12/2024, 06:58:20 UTC
Hey everyone, I was hoping to get more thoughts on this! With the market potentially rotating towards gaming and NFTs, SuperVerse seems like it could be a strong pick for long-term gains. But then again, BEAM’s focus on privacy might hold solid value as more people look for secure and anonymous transactions.

What’s your take? Which project do you think has more potential for growth in 2024?

Governments & banks don’t like anonymity, and it also affects the policies that CEXs must adhere to. Monero is one of the victims of this sensitivity, affecting its price in the market. From what happened with Monero, I don't think there is any room for anonymity anymore, so out of the 2 projects you have above, I prefer SuperVerse.


Thanks for your input, Patikno!
You raise a valid point about governments and banks disliking anonymity, which could indeed affect projects like BEAM. However, I wonder if there’s still a niche market for privacy-focused coins, especially with growing concerns around data breaches and surveillance.

On the other hand, SuperVerse’s focus on gaming and NFTs does seem to align with current market trends, but I’m curious if that sector might become oversaturated in 2024. Do you think SuperVerse has a unique edge over competitors in the gaming/NFT space, or is it relying mainly on the broader market rotation? Also i saw some YouTube videos saying
Super might be a scam, what do you think?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and keeping this discussion going!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: BEAM vs SuperVerse
by
Loco1887
on 04/12/2024, 15:23:55 UTC
Hey everyone, I was hoping to get more thoughts on this! With the market potentially rotating towards gaming and NFTs, SuperVerse seems like it could be a strong pick for long-term gains. But then again, BEAM’s focus on privacy might hold solid value as more people look for secure and anonymous transactions.

What’s your take? Which project do you think has more potential for growth in 2024? Even if you’re undecided, I’d love to hear your perspective!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
BEAM vs SuperVerse
by
Loco1887
on 04/12/2024, 12:49:59 UTC
I think that market might rotate from utility to gaming so I wanna position in it.

Would you rather go for BEAM or SuperVerse in terms of longtime holding. I'm planning to hold for one year at least.

Thanks in advance for your responses
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why is Clearpool Underperforming Compared to Ondo?
by
Loco1887
on 30/11/2024, 16:15:16 UTC
Even smaller RWA coins like Chex performed much better than CPOOL...
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Why is Clearpool Underperforming Compared to Ondo?
by
Loco1887
on 30/11/2024, 09:29:34 UTC
Hi,

While Ondo’s association with BlackRock is undeniably strong, Clearpool is backed by some impressive names as well:
   1.   Sequoia Capital
   2.   Arrington Capital
   3.   Sino Global Capital
   4.   HashKey Group
   5.   Wintermute

These partnerships highlight Clearpool’s credibility and strong institutional support. However, it seems the market isn’t valuing these associations as highly at the moment, possibly due to a lack of widespread visibility or immediate catalysts. Many crypto influencers like miles deutscher were shilling it as possible number 3 in RWA and nothing has happened yet...

Do you think Clearpool needs more marketing, or are there other gaps in its strategy?

Looking forward to your thoughts.

Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Why is Clearpool Underperforming Compared to Ondo?
by
Loco1887
on 30/11/2024, 08:21:30 UTC
Hello everyone,


I’ve been observing Clearpool’s performance lately, and it’s puzzling me. Despite the broader market moving positively, especially with Ondo showing a significant upward trend recently, Clearpool seems to be lagging behind significantly.


A few points I’ve been considering:

1.   Market Sentiment: Is there a lack of confidence in Clearpool compared to Ondo?

2.   Adoption and Use Cases: Has Ondo released updates or partnerships that Clearpool hasn’t matched?

3.   Tokenomics: Are there structural issues with Clearpool’s tokenomics that could be suppressing its growth?

4.   Liquidity and Trading Volume: Is there simply less interest or liquidity in Clearpool’s markets?


If anyone has insights or theories, especially those with knowledge of recent developments in Clearpool’s ecosystem, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Are we missing a catalyst that Ondo has? Or is this simply a delayed reaction, and Clearpool might catch up soon?

Looking forward to discussing this further!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
NEAR Protocol vs Render Token: Best Crypto for AI Exposure
by
Loco1887
on 27/11/2024, 22:12:40 UTC
Hi everyone,

As AI continues to grow in importance, many crypto projects are positioning themselves to benefit from this trend. I’m currently exploring two projects that are gaining attention for their potential in the AI space: Near Protocol (NEAR) and Render Token (RNDR).

NEAR Protocol (NEAR):
   •   A scalable Layer-1 blockchain known for low fees and high-speed transactions.
   •   Strong focus on building decentralized apps (dApps), some of which are AI-integrated.
   •   Ecosystem development is solid, with projects like Open Web Foundry emphasizing AI use cases.

Render Token (RNDR):
   •   A decentralized GPU rendering network, providing on-demand GPU power for AI, 3D rendering, and other compute-heavy tasks.
   •   Already being adopted for AI model training and rendering in the metaverse.
   •   With the growing demand for distributed computing in AI, its use case is very compelling.

What I’m Thinking:

   1.   NEAR offers broad versatility as a blockchain platform that could support various AI-enabled dApps.
   2.   RNDR is a specialized solution, directly tackling GPU resource demand for AI workloads.
   3.   Both projects seem promising, but they target different aspects of the AI revolution.

Questions for the Forum:

   1.   Which of these two projects do you think has more potential to benefit from the AI boom?
   2.   Is it better to go with NEAR for its infrastructure approach, or RNDR for its GPU-centric model?
   3.   Are there any other cryptos you’d recommend for gaining exposure to AI-related growth?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and insights!

Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Dogwifhat vs. Floki: Which Is the Better Long-Term Play?
by
Loco1887
on 25/11/2024, 20:08:27 UTC
Robin Hood Listing and not rising? Why?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Dogwifhat vs. Floki: Which Is the Better Long-Term Play?
by
Loco1887
on 25/11/2024, 08:11:38 UTC
Defnitelly WIF

Why wif if it has less projects running than floki?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Dogwifhat vs. Floki: Which Is the Better Long-Term Play?
by
Loco1887
on 24/11/2024, 22:49:32 UTC
May I know why you are interested in investing in meme coins for the long term? I ask this because meme coins are only good for short-term speculative trading because they tend to be highly volatile, and on top of that, they don't always have a very long life expectancy, which means that a meme coin might die off tomorrow because most of them don't even reveal their actual owners and use some pretextual name and profile to fool their investors.

If you are looking at the long-term picture, I would suggest that you do some research and go for cryptocurrencies that have been around for years and have never deceived their investors. They should have a team, and the project should at least be worth investing in. It should have some literal utility that would make the project stand out among the crowd because we know how saturated this space has become these days.

Isn't floki and especially dogwifhat too big
To disappear after this cycle ? Dog is nr1 memecoin on Solana
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Dogwifhat vs. Floki: Which Is the Better Long-Term Play?
by
Loco1887
on 24/11/2024, 20:08:52 UTC
Hey guys
I’m looking to add a meme coin to my portfolio for a long-term hold and I’m torn between Dogwifhat (WIF) and Floki Inu (FLOKI). Both have gained a lot of attention recently, but I’d love to hear your insights on their potential as long-term investments.

Here are a few questions to kick things off:
1. Which project has stronger fundamentals and utility beyond the hype?
2. How do their communities and marketing efforts compare?
3. Is one better positioned for adoption in the crypto or DeFi ecosystem? Floki has a lot of projects running it seems

Would appreciate any opinions, especially from those who are already invested or following these projects closely! Thanks in advance!

Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Is CPOOL a Good Investment Right Now?
by
Loco1887
on 24/11/2024, 20:03:54 UTC
Mate, I am going to be a little realistic here. Having observed how crypto markets work from 2017 to date. One thing I realized is what pushes market prices of most coins here especially new ones is hype.
So many people don't even care about the use cases or long term benefits. That why you see some very promising projects with a good working product still fail to make it to the top and die out over time. In other words, invest in what you can afford to lose and don't have too many expectations.
Trust me, I invested in some very promising coins/tokens back in 2017 -2018 and today, they are nowhere.



Thanks for sharing, JeromeTech! I agree that many projects fail despite solid use cases. Do you think Clearpool’s focus on uncollateralized lending and institutional adoption could set it apart, or is the risk still too high? What signs do you usually look for to gauge long-term potential in such projects?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Is CPOOL a Good Investment Right Now?
by
Loco1887
on 24/11/2024, 13:45:43 UTC
Hi everyone,

I’m considering adding CPOOL (Clearpool) to my crypto portfolio, but I’d love to hear your thoughts before making a decision.

From what I understand, Clearpool is focused on decentralized capital markets and offers uncollateralized loans through its DeFi platform. The project seems to have a solid use case, especially for institutional players, but I’m curious about its potential for growth.

Here are a few questions I have:

1. Market Potential: Does Clearpool have the potential to become a key player in DeFi lending / RWA compared to competitors? Possible to become nr. 3 in RWA After Ondo and OM?
2. Adoption: Is there enough real-world adoption or any significant partnerships that could boost its value over time?
3. Risks: What are the key risks associated with investing in CPOOL (e.g., regulatory concerns, competition, team transparency)?

I’m planning to hold long-term but would also appreciate insights into short-term price action or any technical analysis.

Would love to hear your experiences or opinions if you’ve invested in CPOOL or followed the project closely.

Thanks in advance for your insights!



Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: I went allin on CPOOL
by
Loco1887
on 17/11/2024, 13:40:32 UTC
Daily volumen 7,8k it's getting worse and worse. Why so many people said it could become number 3 in RWA?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: I went allin on CPOOL
by
Loco1887
on 17/11/2024, 01:11:47 UTC
It's even worse than that. I quickly looked at CEXes it's been traded at and all top 6 trading pairs except the one in Kraken has mostly wash trading. It didn't come as surprise as all of those sites are notorious for open wash trading.

If you don't believe me, check them out yourself. If you don't know how to do that, it's quite fast and easy: look at the orderbook walls and compare it to buys and sells, if buys and sells are happening between them, without touching the buy or sell orders, that's wash trading. I am amazed how they still aren't even hiding it better.

Also their volume often doesn't reflect the buy or sell wall sizes in sites where fake volume is the worst. If someone actually market sells or market buys in them with same or lower volume, walls can't hold them and they leave spikes to charts.

This isn't rocket science and imho everyone should know how to spot it.
What do you mean by that? Its a scam? Once again CPOOL has no movement
I literally explained everything in my sentence, so i am confused.

Is what a scam? CPOOL? I wouldn't know. What i do know is that most of the volume you referred to, is verifiably fake, so i said it was worse. I even gave you tools how to confirm it yourself, so you don't have to just trust my word.

So you need to elaborate your question. If it's about the concept wash trading, that means artificially inflated trading volume. That's not done by the devs, but the CEXes. Though it can be a service that devs are paying for while listing it.

No matter if the project itself is a scam or not, i already said that chart looks fine, so i wouldn't focus on something i couldn't confirm.

Volume is lower than ever. 1/23 of ONDO and yet they pay for that volumen?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Need Advice: Long-Term Spot Investment in Meme Coins
by
Loco1887
on 16/11/2024, 14:19:57 UTC
What are your thoughts on these coins for a long-term spot hold?
Why not Doge? if you are for utility and real world use case, Dogecoin beats them all. Thus, most of them have already made an ATH and this is hard for coins that have reached certain highs in the past, they're unlikely to get back to that spot even as Dogecoin is struggling but it's half way there.

Are there any red flags I should be aware of, or do you see potential in one of them?
It's hard to say because all of them are top meme coins and the potential really differs each of us. I can say that all of them have the potential but I don't like how it went for the past cycle and I am looking for profits. The profit that can be tremendous as if I've won the lottery and that's just me and it's different on your case so determine your goal.

Because doge has so high market cap. Not possible to get 3x in near future due to that fact
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Need Advice: Long-Term Spot Investment in Meme Coins
by
Loco1887
on 16/11/2024, 11:09:13 UTC
Hi everyone,

I’ve been looking into some meme coins for a long-term spot investment and would love to hear your opinions. The ones I’m currently considering are PEPE, DOGWIFHAT, BONK, and FLOKI.

My goal is to hold them for a longer period (1+ years) and see how they perform. I understand that meme coins are high-risk and heavily driven by hype, community strength, and sometimes luck. However, I’m trying to evaluate which of these might have better potential based on:
   1.   Community support and activity. (Currently BONk has massive volume compared to its marketcap)
   2.   Utility or any real-world use case behind the project.
   3.   Team or development activity (if applicable).
   4.   Listing on exchanges and trading volume/liquidity.

What are your thoughts on these coins for a long-term spot hold? Are there any red flags I should be aware of, or do you see potential in one of them?

Thanks in advance for your insights!