Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 218 results by MA_talk
READ this report from Martin Armstrong (or not because you don't want to waste 2 hours reading thru ~280 pages, and still don't know what to buy or sell at the very end):
http://web.archive.org/web/20190623170921/
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/The=Greatest=Trade=of=the=Century.pdf
You need to change all the = to - in the above link, just to avoid any copyright issue. Not sure who posted this, but pretty sure that he or she lost $3000+ by attending WEC and getting this report. And you could add the web archive before that, if the link is gone.
If ANYONE can tell me what & when to buy the particular asset profitably based on the above Armstrong's report, please post it here.
That report is the SOLID PROOF that Armstrong is a charlatan who can talk through ~280 pages, and still manages NOT to tell you what & when to buy.
Just AMAZING!
Hello Gumbi
"We should see a new high next week which could be as soon Monday with a decline thereafter into the week of the 18th(TP) which should be a panic cycle to the downside. a lot of these moves will be determined by the reversal system, so as long as the Dow does not elect its next bullish reversal at 24765,
the market should decline into the the week of the 18th.
The 2nd quarter is a turning point so we either have to make new lows or close below the 1st quarterly close. The intraday low may occur in May, with June being the lowest monthly closing."
Thanks for the update. Will be watching those numbers.
Any word on a time frame for when the major slingshot move up might occur and if it might be connected to the potential low created following the 2nd quarter turning point?
Fred
"We should see a new high next week which could be as soon Monday with a decline thereafter into the week of the 18th(TP) which should be a panic cycle to the downside. a lot of these moves will be determined by the reversal system, so as long as the Dow does not elect its next bullish reversal at 24765,
the market should decline into the the week of the 18th.
The 2nd quarter is a turning point so we either have to make new lows or close below the 1st quarterly close. The intraday low may occur in May, with June being the lowest monthly closing."
Thanks for the update. Will be watching those numbers.
Any word on a time frame for when the major slingshot move up might occur and if it might be connected to the potential low created following the 2nd quarter turning point?
Fred
Slingshot here. Slingshot there. Stock market slingshot. Gold market slingshot. All sensational.
If Armstrong can EVER predict anything, why doesn't his model predicts anything AHEAD of time, and just tell you clear buy/sell signals which can easily be evaluated for its performance. A million lines of software code at the end of the days MUST make buy/sell decisions for trading to make money. Maybe, should, won't do.
But NO, Socrates will NEVER tell you that. Then Armstrong "interprets Socrates". Then Gumbi interprets Armstrong. Then Digilab interprets Gumbi, or answer his own vague questions. Then the readers fall for the answers and continue to subscribe. If ANYONE in this chain makes any mistakes, it's their own fault, because Socrates is unemotional and by default doesn't make any human mistakes. Well, sure. How can any algorithm or person make any mistakes with hindsight?
One must wonder why after almost 400 pages of this forum, with some hedge fund managers here, and still NOBODY found the magic trading formula. (Well, maybe the emperor is naked, and maybe there is just no magic trading based on Armstrong's.)
Why hasn't Armstrong made billions like Bill Ackman during this crisis? Oh, because Armstrong said that it's just a normal flu, duh?
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/why-exaggerated-nonsense-on-flu/
That is a colossal mistake. Nor did Socrates see the biggest panic in crude oil history, going negative.
https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com/2020/05/armstrong-failed-to-predict-crude-oil.html
The whole world is all connected, and Socrates supposedly tracks all financial markets. It's sufficient to show that Socrates doesn't work, with just prediction failures in crude oil market. If one piece of puzzle is wrong, there is no way that Socrates can assemble the entire picture correctly.
Oh, but it runs in DOSBox (as shown in the photos from above link), dude! MSDOS program apparently, not on super-computer.
No answers to the tough questions huh? Just insults? You are only insulting yourself bud by not answering. Showing your true colors.
Everyone can see you for what you really are. Ask a question that does not gel with your agenda, start the insults and diversions. lol.
Thanks for proving our point.
the answer to all those forecasts is that they are simply out of date. Socrates updates the array/reversals every day/week/month and you want to cling to a static blog post.
New reversals are generated if new highs/lows are made, which of course are not going to be included. That is the mistake that is being made so there is nothing to address and those blog posts prove nothing at all. That destroys all so called claims about failed forecasts posted here. The private blog of course would of included updates but that is conveniently never mentioned. They have already come to their conclusion why should they bother looking any deeper into it.
Armstrong claims to be able to forecast long-term trends, years or decades before they happen. Now, Gumbi says that these forecasts are simply out of date.
If I continue to change my forecasts all the way dynamically, I can get everything right. I will just stay behind current events by 1 day, and everyday I will come out and say that "see, I predicted the exact things yesterday. You all need to pay me and subscribe the private blogs."
Let's see, Dow Jones next major test going to be 40000. On Jan 24, 2020.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wJ_BTOLxxo
Hmm. Isn't that too close to the sharpest stock market crash, and the great forecaster did NOT warn anything about major crash?
"Great" call.
Gumbi, why do you want to sue AnonymousCoder for defamation, when you are not Armstrong himself?
Isn't that all glories to you, when someone says that you're Armstrong himself? Or is such statement adding to your infamy?
Hey, you still owe me the explanation of how both October 7th and October 1st are ECM dates claimed by Armstrong himself, and Armstrong claims ECM is accurate down to the day.
Geez, accurate down to the day to which date?
Hello Ma_talk,
....
Regarding the ECM dates being different, Ma_talk that is just a typo buddy, Armstrong has revealed in great detail how the ECM dates are calculated. there is not a single blog post that supports it. There is typos found under his writings but there have been only 2/3 that have been found over the course of decades.
Armstrong's core model of ECM was dated 2015.75 as Oct 7th, 2015
https://web.archive.org/web/20190210014758/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/writings/1999-2/the-business-cycle-and-the-future/
by the way, he was unable to properly round 3.1416 to 3142, but rather 3144 days between each ECM dates,
and then he changed his date later to Oct 1st, 2015, claiming that his model produces dates accurate down to the day,
https://web.archive.org/web/20170514145217/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/did-world-war-iii-start-on-the-precise-day-of-the-ecm/
In fact, his 8.6 has 10 fractional digits to allow him to have accuracy down to the day. It's really 8.6153846615
http://web.archive.org/web/20141015175106/http:/armstrongeconomics.com/
Obviously Oct 1st, is not the same date as Oct 7th. And he's got all the future ECM dates to reconcile as TYPO, but of course, they will all be accurate down to the day.
While Gumbi/Armstrong coming in, saying that it's a typo, he does remember to promote Armstrong by throwing in more ambiguous forecasts from Armstrong. Just keep predicting for another 1000 times. You bet Armstrong will get at least one of the predictions right.
The monthly forecasting array on the Dow Jones was showing a panic cycle in March 2020 as far back as SEPTEMBER 2019. it called for February 2020 as a turning point which produced a high, March as the next which produced a low which was also a panic cycle, April was the next turning point which produced a high, now we have May which should produce a low on an intraday/closing basis.
See link for monthly array in September 2019:https://ibb.co/YWqR9Yp
That is what real PROOF looks like, there is tremendous value in Armstrong's work.
Have you ever thought for a single moment that you could be wrong? People with real intelligence doubt and question things but coder is utterly convinced that I am Armstrong based on a PM message, as usual always jumping to conclusions
how stupid and naive do you have to be? The only thing it proves is that you must have some mental disability.
Every single conclusion by coder requires a massive leap of faith.
See link for monthly array in September 2019:https://ibb.co/YWqR9Yp
That is what real PROOF looks like, there is tremendous value in Armstrong's work.
Have you ever thought for a single moment that you could be wrong? People with real intelligence doubt and question things but coder is utterly convinced that I am Armstrong based on a PM message, as usual always jumping to conclusions
how stupid and naive do you have to be? The only thing it proves is that you must have some mental disability.Every single conclusion by coder requires a massive leap of faith.
Where did you go for the past month or so? Couldn't take the heat on all the wrong calls? Think people already forgot, so you are back again to pump some more before the dump?
Oh wait of course nobody here knows how to read an array. There is no discussion happening here. This is the losers club, I am already gone.
Gumbi, why do you want to sue AnonymousCoder for defamation, when you are not Armstrong himself?
Isn't that all glories to you, when someone says that you're Armstrong himself? Or is such statement adding to your infamy?
Hey, you still owe me the explanation of how both October 7th and October 1st are ECM dates claimed by Armstrong himself, and Armstrong claims ECM is accurate down to the day.
Geez, accurate down to the day to which date?
Lol, I might actually believe it, just look at this pure coincidence blog post today:
Is Marty shaking in his boots?
Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/opinion/creating-a-different-new-world-order/
Posted May 4, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Dear Mr. Armstrong:
I apologize that I called you a fraud. Sometimes being a virgo is very hard. I became information overloaded and my tongue is very sharp. I am still reading your blog and I am amazed that you post the Corbett Report, which I follow religiously like yours.
QUESTION: Dear Mr. Armstrong:
I apologize that I called you a fraud. Sometimes being a virgo is very hard. I became information overloaded and my tongue is very sharp. I am still reading your blog and I am amazed that you post the Corbett Report, which I follow religiously like yours.
Is Marty shaking in his boots?
I normally don't read Armstrong's blog, which provides no valuable information. Below is the quote from the post of "reader" from the above link:
Quote
This COVID-19 hoax is the greatest deception of all time and/or in my life time. No matter what I tell my mother about the truth, I was laughed and ignored.
And Martin Armstrong did not say anything about it, implicitly agreeing to this "reader".
This entire post has so much rambling that it almost seems that Armstrong is losing it. And of course,
Quote
I "excepted"
Another typical typo from Armstrong.This reader appears to be a Chinese, wishing that Nationalist Party takes over Mainland China. And use Middle Kingdom to refer to China.
Well, I have lots of Chinese friends and relatives, and have been reading Chinese news for the last N years, and let me tell you that
ZERO PERCENT
of Chinese that I know will ever use the term "Middle Kingdom" in such way, and
ZERO PERCENT
of Chinese that I know has this desire of Nationalist Party taking over.
Seriously NONE. The above "comments" from this reader seems to me to be MADE UP totally, due to his lack of knowledge of Chinese culture and people.
WHY would a reader make up some comments like that? Well, most likely, the existence of this reader was made up, possibly just like several (if not all) of other readers' comments.
Indeed, what Armstrong has been providing is just sort of endless comedy shows.
But if you want to take his blog as gospel, you are certainly welcome. Extra-ordinary claim (of successful predictions) requires extra-ordinary evidences. Ordinary hedge fund manager Bill Ackman came out of this COVID-19, earning several billions. And Martin Armstrong made how much? Let him show his tax return, paying billions of capital gain, and I would believe that. He can prove that by giving a reputable third party the right to access his tax return using form 4506-T, and I'm sure that he can lay this entire discussion about him being a FRAUD to rest immediately. I will go on record that if I can volunteer to be this third party, and report nothing but truth.
Armstrong is just 1 signature away to lay all fraud claims to rest.
PROOF:
PM from Gumbi to AnonymousCoder today:
I will sue you for defamation if you keep this up
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
Every single defrauded person should report their case at econsumer.gov
So Gumbi just finally REVEALed himself as the real Martin Armstrong who has been posting promotional lies here, in this private message to AnonymousCoder. But various other forum participants have already guessed this out sometime in 2019.
Defamation is only valid if the person being sued is NOT telling the truth.
Quote
Checkmate back at Martin Armstrong.
Let's think for a bit. WHY would a great "forecaster" Martin Armstrong bother to sue anyone, when his forecasting record is supposedly impeccable, and supposedly making all of his subscribers so filthy rich, and that his forecasting record should have spoken for itself?
WHY? WHY? I don't think I need to tell you the answers.
You mean Martin Armstrong doesn't have a magic computer that can predict the future?
I'm so disappointed
I'm so disappointed
Ha, I enjoy your sarcasm.
I think he does have a "magic" program, but it runs in MSDOS (pre-Window era), and it probably generates those cryptic timing array plots with ancient low-resolution BAR graph with limited colors. But of course, Armstrong claims that his program is self-aware, monitors global capital, and runs on a government-owned Super-Computer (Sequoia) and takes about 100% of the annual capacity of that, when it's supposedly for government usage only.
I think about the only thing that Armstrong's MSDOS program maybe has automated is converting price trends into English sentences, as if those sentences have any predicative powers, but just hindsight that cannot be traded for any profits. But hey, they always sound so correct, because that's all in the PAST. Well, when the future prices come, you bet the "correct" sentences will be uttered again, but Armstrong could NOT tell you ahead of time by giving you any buy/sell signals. Instead, he asks you to attend stupid expensive conferences as if he hid some tricks up in his sleeves, when there is just more BS.
Just Google search "Armstrong WEC reviews", and find out for yourself about his WEC conferences.
The other hilarious thing is MA claiming his machine predicted COVID-19 and the ensuing economic carnage it has caused. Yet again, that same (cycle?) playbook is rolled out where MA claims his machine predicted the event - but only AFTER it happened. The very same thing happened with the REPO crisis in September, which alas saw an expensive "report" available to buy. The same thing with COVID-19, only this time a virtual webinar is being hosted, because the virus has brutally cancelled MA's only pay cheque this year.
Having attended his 2018 WEC in Orlando, I can you tell you this:
The main prediction from 2020-2024 was for a COMMODITY BOOM, where CA and AU would be the big winners over other major Western economies. Based on a massive decline in consumer and therefore business demand in the coming years, both because of unemployment/bankruptcy and simply permanently changed behaviours, that now seems unlikely. Oil has been declining since 2014 and it looks unlikely that trend will reverse, not least with renewables becoming more mainstream.
At the 2018 Orlando WEC, not once did MA mention:
Thank you for your precious review. I checked the date of Armstrong's commodity boom post on financialsense.com, and it was "right on target", exactly landing at the PEAK of $CRB index. As I have said many times, you gain a LOT more money by trading AGAINST Armstrong's advice. For Armstrong, I'm sure he can twist his words and brains and convince readers of all kinds that
a commodity boom means NEGATIVE crude oil price!
That should go into historical failures of predictions made by anyone. A boom is a NEGATIVE price?!
Yet another massive miss for MA and his ECM/Socrates.
What further evidence do people need to see this guy is a complete charlatan? He plays with the known flaws of human psychology to line his pockets, and does it in a very underhand way, where much of his socioeconomic commentary is logical and interesting, which builds trust, then he uses clever underhand tactics to make out his Socrates/ECM are some gift from God, so creating a cult-like persona that has more blind followers than wide-eyed detractors.
Having attended his 2018 WEC in Orlando, I can you tell you this:
The main prediction from 2020-2024 was for a COMMODITY BOOM, where CA and AU would be the big winners over other major Western economies. Based on a massive decline in consumer and therefore business demand in the coming years, both because of unemployment/bankruptcy and simply permanently changed behaviours, that now seems unlikely. Oil has been declining since 2014 and it looks unlikely that trend will reverse, not least with renewables becoming more mainstream.
At the 2018 Orlando WEC, not once did MA mention:
- 2020 would see an economic crash that would be as historic as 1929
- Oil futures would turn negative for the first time in history
- Major economies would see the highest increase in unemployed in history
- That this would all be caused by an overreaction to an unknown virus
Thank you for your precious review. I checked the date of Armstrong's commodity boom post on financialsense.com, and it was "right on target", exactly landing at the PEAK of $CRB index. As I have said many times, you gain a LOT more money by trading AGAINST Armstrong's advice. For Armstrong, I'm sure he can twist his words and brains and convince readers of all kinds that
a commodity boom means NEGATIVE crude oil price!
That should go into historical failures of predictions made by anyone. A boom is a NEGATIVE price?!
Yet another massive miss for MA and his ECM/Socrates.
What further evidence do people need to see this guy is a complete charlatan? He plays with the known flaws of human psychology to line his pockets, and does it in a very underhand way, where much of his socioeconomic commentary is logical and interesting, which builds trust, then he uses clever underhand tactics to make out his Socrates/ECM are some gift from God, so creating a cult-like persona that has more blind followers than wide-eyed detractors.
Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/products_services/manipulating-the-world-economy-on-ebay/
We have only 180 copies here in Florida which can be mailed out immediately this week. The rest (1600 left) are in Pennsylvania which we intend to deliver to Amazon. It will probably take them a few more weeks to get them posted. But for now, we have 180 left here in Florida for our readers only.
Please go to eBay to complete that transaction.
Please go to eBay to complete that transaction.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/324141916183
You guys see what I see under "Similar sponsored items" and "People who viewed this item also viewed", right?
Didn't Armstrong had a Japanese girlfriend for a while? Guess who's buying the books up...
The images are so hilarious!! It obviously shows the products that were bought by the people (or a single person) who is buying his book. For obvious reason, the buyer(possibly Martin himself) appears to be peeking at Japanese girls.
Don't even bother replying if you can't keep up. Read and understand what is written - you clearly don't.
With this Coronavirus scare - might be a good time for you bashers here to take a course in reading comprehension.
With this Coronavirus scare - might be a good time for you bashers here to take a course in reading comprehension.
Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.
You are misinterpreting what he is saying. He is saying that the fact that we can forecast any (meaning even one) event to the day PROVES that markets are by no means RANDOM.
It's pretty clear what you said. It seems you have a comprehension problem.
What an excellent catch on over45.
These people, Digilab, over45 are scums of the society. The best thing that happens in this CoronaVirus is that Armstrong cannot hold any WEC conferences.
Google search "Armstrong WEC review", and you will find the reviews from real people, instead of some self-congratulating remarks from himself.
If Armstrong/Socrates is a good trader, he should be making billions from trades alone. Last time I checked Armstrong is still selling his reports that are 97% historical facts with 3% or less super vague, unactionable market comments.
Why doesn't Armstrong or Socrates ever post an actual buy or sell on specific financial instruments? Because he doesn't dare to make any mistakes. He relies on you to make that call, and either way, it will always be your own fault and never his fault. He has no guts, and no integrity to take any responsibilities for ANY actually buy or sell call.
... A bunch of BS... .this is what the private blog says .
Standard scamming practices by Armstrong. Just predict as MANY things possible, and then in hindsight, point out the 5% that is actually correct, and then congratulate himself as the hero.
If he is that good, he wouldn't tell you that Corona Virus is just a flu on Feb 5th when Dow was 29290, just 8days from peak at 29423.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/why-exaggerated-nonsense-on-flu/
Why Exaggerated Nonsense on Flu? | Armstrong Economics
I have said many times, and I will say it again. Unless you want to trade OPPOSITE to what Armstrong says, do NOT read Anything on his private or public blog at all.
That "just a flu" was a GREAT call by Armstrong, and probably burned a huge hole in their portfolio for anyone who believes in his AI Socrates.
@over45, @truth727 or truth737, @Gumbi.
You just never respond to my criticism on Marty, because ......
you CAN'T.
Martin Armstrong fell flat on his face, and he did that to himself. Liars eventually always get caught, because they cannot keep their stories straight.
On the most important event of 2020, Martin Armstrong said that "it's just flu". The URL even tells you "why exaggerated nonsense on flu".
Wow! "Great" stinking call of the century!!
... A bunch of BS... .this is what the private blog says .
Standard scamming practices by Armstrong. Just predict as MANY things possible, and then in hindsight, point out the 5% that is actually correct, and then congratulate himself as the hero.
If he is that good, he wouldn't tell you that Corona Virus is just a flu on Feb 5th when Dow was 29290, just 8days from peak at 29423.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com › ...
Web results
Why Exaggerated Nonsense on Flu? | Armstrong Economics
I have said many times, and I will say it again. Unless you want to trade OPPOSITE to what Armstrong says, do NOT read Anything on his private or public blog at all.
That "just a flu" was a GREAT call by Armstrong, and probably burned a huge hole in their portfolio for anyone who believes in his AI Socrates.
Basically MA called for a correction - it came. A continued correction down to 22000-21000 if we had closed about 50pts lower on the DOW today...this is where it gets tricky - we will see what he says this weekend. Next week we could continue to sell hard to those levels.
Gold to find support around mid 1400s
Gold to find support around mid 1400s
Armstrong calling stock market to peak at 2015.75 was WRONG.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140705112327/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/will-the-dow-reach-30000-by-2015-0809.pdf
Armstrong calling bond market to peak at 2015.75 was WRONG.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200217065858/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/interest-rates/big-bang-v-repo/
Armstrong calling bitcoin to fall to 775 was WRONG.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190102141558/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/cryptocurrency/bitcoin-the-end-of-cryptocurrencies/
During this stock rally up to Feb 2020, I have already lost counts on how many times Armstrong called for corrections and no new highs. Let's say he called that 5 times for correction.
So that's a total of 8 WRONGs above, plus this recent one correct. That is a terrible record, and any investors/traders following Armstrong will lose money.
The trick of getting a good "prediction" record is always to "predict" MANY MANY times, and only count the ones that are correct in hindsight.
Armstrong NEVER got his Bachelor's degree in Science, according to this source, but he sure knows how to BS, like nobody else.
wow wow wow market getting crushed will keep you guys posted if he posts on his private blog. making bank lads. he will surley comment on this soon. 4000 points since ecm turn this is a dream someone pinch me.
Let's remind everyone what happened at the ECM turning point and the stock market:
First there was a correction, nothing to speak of (3-4% on major indices). Precisely on the intermediate bottom Marty was self congratulatory for calling the high. Then everyone who was short got blown away in just 4 trading days with new highs on all major indices. Most people got out of their shorts, and they probably didn't profit from the current decline.
Now if the current correction occured from the ECM high I would have given Armstrong props for calling the top and the ECM date. But that simply didn't happen.
Great explanation & chart!!
But hold on, according to the Martin Armstrong from another parallel dimension, ECM date is 1/26/2020, not 1/18/2020.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190210014758/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/writings/1999-2/the-business-cycle-and-the-future/
But that was NOT the peak, but much closer to the 3-4% correction bottom bouncing back up to NEW high.
Geez! Let's see. I'm such a brain-washed follower of Martin Armstrong that he must be right at all costs.
Quote
---- Starting as the brain-washed ----
But was ECM date 1/18/2020, or 1/26/2020?
Geez. So much internal conflicts.... But 1/18/2020 is NOT 1/26/2020. Which day should I pick? Geez. Shall I go to another parallel world?
Which world am I in?
But 1/18/2020 is NOT 1/26/2020. WHICH DATE!!!! Somebody help me!!!
OMG, it's going to get worse!! The dates will be further apart going forward. OMG! What am I going to do!
That difference in 12 days will easily cost me 15+% difference in price. Geez, what am I going to do?
---- End ----
But was ECM date 1/18/2020, or 1/26/2020
?Geez. So much internal conflicts.... But 1/18/2020 is NOT 1/26/2020. Which day should I pick? Geez. Shall I go to another parallel world?
Which world am I in?
But 1/18/2020 is NOT 1/26/2020. WHICH DATE!!!! Somebody help me!!!
OMG, it's going to get worse!! The dates will be further apart going forward. OMG! What am I going to do!
That difference in 12 days will easily cost me 15+% difference in price. Geez, what am I going to do?
---- End ----
Man, Martin Armstrong knows his shit about BS.
Quote
But feel free to blast out your personal opinions about him, which is within your right of freedom of speech.
It's one thing to post your personal opinions about him - it is another to slander and liable him - which is what you and a few others here are doing. You are hiding behind anonymous identities and posting defamatory statements and images. Internet protections extend to service providers / publishers but not to the same extent for posters. I hope that he or his employees eventually go after the bashers here who have stupidly put all of their slanderous accusations on the web forever.
He has been extraordinarily accurate on his macro calls and his Socrates service does what it says it will -- if you understand what it is supposed to offer by reading the simple terms of use. The bashers here lack the ability to understand a simple paragraph of text that they must agree to and check off in order to access his service. They hide behind anonymous ID's because they don't have the guts to show themselves or stand up for their actions.
Oh, over45, you think I didn't look up what's slander before doing all these? If you are presenting facts, that is LEGALLY NOT libeling.
I provide facts & links in my posts. You did NOT. You are expressing opinions, not facts.
Armstrong calling stock market to peak at 2015.75 was WRONG.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140705112327/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/will-the-dow-reach-30000-by-2015-0809.pdf
Armstrong calling bond market to peak at 2015.75 was WRONG.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200217065858/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/interest-rates/big-bang-v-repo/
That is how pathetic Armstrong is at macro calls. Only when goldbugs saying government manipulating gold prices are crazy. But not when Armstrong says government intervention in bond markets is real manipulation. His super-computer AI did NOT see that coming, huh?
I'm just waiting Armstrong to sue me, and then I will go crowd-funding, and get all the extra publicity and PUT ALL THE FACTS out there and IN COURT. That will literally be the END of Armstrong & Socrates. In fact, I'm legally protected the same way, and I can sue you for libeling when you are NOT presenting facts.
For anyone here who wants to contribute to the NON-PROFIT efforts at
https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com/
Please private message AnonymousCoder or me, and send your post in HTML to us, or even become regular contributor.
We are looking for posts that document well with links to Armstrong's posts via archive.org (Internet Archive) so that we don't create more back links to Armstrong's sites.
Also, I suggest everyone here to
1. leave comments at Armstrong's Amazon ebook and videos,
2. email Amazon about Armstrong's products about your opinions.
3. email sites that publishes Armstrong
4. NEVER visit Armstrong's sites.
5. Leave actual link backs to posts here, or even better, the NON-PROFIT site above.
6. Contact FTC or any federal legal offices, or even Judge John Keenan or any other judges who dealt with Armstrong before, and voice your concerns.
Eventually, we will win by NUMBER, and Armstrong's advocates will drop away unless they are paid of course.
Armstrong said that his ebook is "out-of-stock". But his real-time streaming video is also "out-of-stock". Go figure.
And for the benefits of converting the naives who follow Armstrong, I suggest everyone also refrain from
1. Criticize Armstrong without any documented links/facts.
2. Being biased.
But feel free to blast out your personal opinions about him, which is within your right of freedom of speech.
https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com/
Please private message AnonymousCoder or me, and send your post in HTML to us, or even become regular contributor.
We are looking for posts that document well with links to Armstrong's posts via archive.org (Internet Archive) so that we don't create more back links to Armstrong's sites.
Also, I suggest everyone here to
1. leave comments at Armstrong's Amazon ebook and videos,
2. email Amazon about Armstrong's products about your opinions.
3. email sites that publishes Armstrong
4. NEVER visit Armstrong's sites.
5. Leave actual link backs to posts here, or even better, the NON-PROFIT site above.
6. Contact FTC or any federal legal offices, or even Judge John Keenan or any other judges who dealt with Armstrong before, and voice your concerns.
Eventually, we will win by NUMBER, and Armstrong's advocates will drop away unless they are paid of course.
Armstrong said that his ebook is "out-of-stock". But his real-time streaming video is also "out-of-stock". Go figure.
And for the benefits of converting the naives who follow Armstrong, I suggest everyone also refrain from
1. Criticize Armstrong without any documented links/facts.
2. Being biased.
But feel free to blast out your personal opinions about him, which is within your right of freedom of speech.
Well.. the predicted panic cycle this week in the stock market seems pretty much on time.. 
Aaand... predicted temp high in gold yesterday... This is like stealing candy from a baby haha.
How is your trading going?
Aaand... predicted temp high in gold yesterday... This is like stealing candy from a baby haha.
How is your trading going?
For someone like Armstrong who cannot get his prediction correct every 8.6 years,
Not a bond market peak
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/interest-rates/big-bang-v-repo/
Not a stock market peak:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140705112327/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/will-the-dow-reach-30000-by-2015-0809.pdf
And changes his "predictions" when the time gets closer and it's obvious,
He gets even more tries at the weekly/monthly/yearly levels.
Oh, and he doesn't even keep track of the conditional predictions. And therefore, guess what, he thinks he is ALWAYS right.
His whole BS based on the all-important 8.6 years cycle of ECM, and then he cannot even get anything right on the date?
Oh, and according to the younger Martin Armstrong, ECM was 10/7/2015, while according to the older Martin Armstrong, ECM was on 10/1/2015. (See the link below for the two dates).
https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com/p/economic-confidence-model.html
Now, go figure. Should it be bond peak or stock peak? Should it be 10/1/2015 or 10/7/2015?
If you guess it wrong from one of the two choices, it is ON YOU, because you are so stupid that you cannot understand his complicate models that produces TWO different dates, and TWO different predictions.
Just like how Armstrong explained, bond market "crashed" from the participation, not price. Oh, didn't he just say that AFTER-THE-FACT? Isn't that the very definition of HINDSIGHT?
https://media.giphy.com/media/sO5eDV8ZBXERO/giphy-facebook_s.jpg
anonymous coder can't leave his computer here is definitive proof that he wants
anonymous coder can't leave his computer here is definitive proof that he wants
How about you respond to Amrstrong's failed prediction on 2015.75 ECM date as the peak of the stock market AND the peak of the bond market?
Armstrong got 2 picks. And he still got it WRONG! What kind of super-computer AI algorithm is that?
Oh, maybe you just want to ignore all of his FAILED predictions to make Armstrong's record as 100% success rate?