Wonderful! I thought as much because you could rarely get to find an online registered licensed casino nowadays that's absolutely KYC free. If such  is truly KYC free as claimed then it's either they are legally licensed/recognised or they are using a no KYC as a way to allure and fascinate users into their platform.

Coming clean in their ANN thread to make it known that it's a KYC casino still won't stop interested users from using their services in as much as they render quality and fair  service. Taking gamblers unaware isn't anything encouraging especially with KYC issues.

Wager requirement will make it difficult for players who want to abuse the casino to mix coin, because there is a chance they lose a few percent of their money or even if they are unlucky lose everything when they want to meet the wager requirement to be able to withdraw their money, and even though they say non-KYC, usually when there are irregularities, KYC becomes mandatory for the player.

BTW welcome to the forum I see you are also quickly promoting on this forum through signature campaigns, good luck.

That is true, but the fact is that these so called no KYC casinos are all fake and usually request KYC whenever they feel like it which is why their big claims cannot be trusted. I have experienced this particular case myself unfortunately.

Only decentralised sites are proper no KYC casinos, but they cannot offer 100% anonymity either and they aren't as popular as their centralised counterparts.

Hey, this is my first post on this forum. I found it the most relevant forum to share my thought, so I created an account.

We are still getting closer to quantum computing, which in itself wouldn't cause much of an issue to most due to new quantum resistant encryption algorithms. The developers can swiftly fork the network - new quantum resistant addresses will appear. There is just a slight issue, what do we do with addresses which have no owners, or Nakamoto's wallets? Nobody can move the bitcoin from the weak addy to a strong quantum addy. They will be waiting till the day somebody gets access to them by breaking the old standard with quantum computing.

I heard that Satoshi holds over 1M bitcoin on his wallets, he better be alive and active somehow. A theft of 1M btc would cause chaos. Well it wouldn't change how bitcoin works, but you get my point, it is no good. We can neither confiscate the bitcoin or hold it somehow (even if there is a way to do so, it would not bring any good reputation to the situation). We can't transfer the old addy format to the new one obviously. We are left with the option to wait and see whoever gets it first, China, Russia, US..?