Ninjastic
Search content
Sort by
Showing 4 of 4 results by MarketGamer
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash Nvidia Miner v0.4.5 (Linux)
by
MarketGamer
on 25/09/2017, 17:52:05 UTC
Quote from: andi_21 on September 25, 2017, 04:58:56 PM
5x1070 OC

Code:
   GPU1 57°C  Sol/s: 444.5  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 444.2  I/s: 238.3  Sh/s: 0.111
   GPU3 58°C  Sol/s: 444.1  Sol/W: 3.97  Avg: 435.2  I/s: 233.2  Sh/s: 0.110
   GPU0 60°C  Sol/s: 436.1  Sol/W: 3.97  Avg: 435.6  I/s: 233.7  Sh/s: 0.106
   GPU2 59°C  Sol/s: 435.3  Sol/W: 4.01  Avg: 439.6  I/s: 235.8  Sh/s: 0.106  +
   GPU4 57°C  Sol/s: 437.9  Sol/W: 4.01  Avg: 440.5  I/s: 236.2  Sh/s: 0.106  +
   ========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00  Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538

Flypool Statistics: http://oi63.tinypic.com/v4osuh.jpg

Local:   ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec

~5% difference (2% should be fee)

For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)

Can you please post your OC and Power Limit settings? I'm also using 1070s and only get 3.82 Sol/W

Thanks!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash Nvidia Miner v0.4.4 (Linux)
by
MarketGamer
on 22/09/2017, 16:46:51 UTC
Thought I'd share some OC settings after running a few tests

These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19

  • Power Limit: 118w
  • Core Overclock: 110
  • Mem Overclock: 600


With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...

Avg. Sol.   3146.0
Avg. I/s     1683.8
Avg. Sol/W   3.82

Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
    
    
    
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash Nvidia Miner v0.4.4 (Linux)
by
MarketGamer
on 21/09/2017, 04:33:13 UTC
Running 0.4.4 for about 5 hours now, so far so good.

Is there a reason the GPUs slowly change order in the output, can they be fixed in place instead so always output in order 0,1,2,3.... etc.?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash Nvidia Miner v0.4.2 (Linux)
by
MarketGamer
on 15/09/2017, 03:29:34 UTC
Just been mining a few hours with 0.4.2 and noticed it had stopped with a "msg buffer full" error.

I had been running 0.4.1 for longer and didn't have the error so not sure if it's something caused by the changes.

Rig is seven 1070s running on nanopool.

Performance for me is matching EWBF and seems a bit more consistent over time according to the stats from the pool.