Search content
Sort by
Showing 8 of 8 results by Master of Puppets
Re: I hope pro-forks people learned a valuable lesson with this.
They must think they can still fool people with their "New York Times"-crap. Nobody cares about the NYT. What the fuck do they know about btc?
Lol, btc survives and does well and the NYT completely ruins their reputation with this story now.
Gavin/Mike, is that you?
Lol, btc survives and does well and the NYT completely ruins their reputation with this story now.
Hopefully your right and Bitcoin Core does not announce it is supporting 2 MB hardfork compatible with Bitcoin Classic in the last hope to try keep control of Bitcoin.
But the real reason why Bitcoin Core loosing control over future of Bitcoin are those developers who try make Bitcoin blockchain just a settlement layer for offchain and centralized solutions for transactions, while Bitcoin Classic aim is continue with Satoshi plan to make decentralized P2P transactions possible right on Bitcoin blockchain, as long as technology allows it - average computer necessary for full node not the obsolete Rasberry PIs device or cheap virtual servers requirement today to run full node in Bitcoin Core vision.
I know who failed, and Bitcoin Core will not gain my trust even if they supports 2 MB hardfork compatible with Bitcoin Classic, because Bitcoin Core for example still planning RBF (relay by fee) feature which kills 0 confirmations as a payment possibility because Bitcoin Core vision is Bitcoin as a settlement layer for offchain transactions, not a decentralized P2P transactions possible on Bitcoin blockchain for payments.
Thus upgrading to future Bitcoin Core 0.12 is not advised, unless you completly agree with Bitcoin Core vision to keep Bitcoin small with blockchain transactions only for elite.
But the real reason why Bitcoin Core loosing control over future of Bitcoin are those developers who try make Bitcoin blockchain just a settlement layer for offchain and centralized solutions for transactions, while Bitcoin Classic aim is continue with Satoshi plan to make decentralized P2P transactions possible right on Bitcoin blockchain, as long as technology allows it - average computer necessary for full node not the obsolete Rasberry PIs device or cheap virtual servers requirement today to run full node in Bitcoin Core vision.
I know who failed, and Bitcoin Core will not gain my trust even if they supports 2 MB hardfork compatible with Bitcoin Classic, because Bitcoin Core for example still planning RBF (relay by fee) feature which kills 0 confirmations as a payment possibility because Bitcoin Core vision is Bitcoin as a settlement layer for offchain transactions, not a decentralized P2P transactions possible on Bitcoin blockchain for payments.
Thus upgrading to future Bitcoin Core 0.12 is not advised, unless you completly agree with Bitcoin Core vision to keep Bitcoin small with blockchain transactions only for elite.
Gavin/Mike, is that you?
Who needed thumb-scanning, DNA-leaching, Retina-scanning fucking Robocoin? Who? Nobody, that's who.
High fees and high surveilance. There was no demand for their uncompetitve product. They won't be missed. The opensource-ATMs you build yourself are better than their ponzi.
High fees and high surveilance. There was no demand for their uncompetitve product. They won't be missed. The opensource-ATMs you build yourself are better than their ponzi.
LOL. "Phantom btc" would drop to 10$ within 4 or 6 weeks. So basically you're suggesting to donate all users' balances to cryptsy.
The idea is very idiotic. "Phantom-btc" tanks and burns the minute trading starts ...
PM me; i'll sell you 5 Phantom-BTC for every 0.5 btc you send me. Easy 10-begger for you. Just let me know how much you want to order. We'll deliver any size of trade.
Get rich quick with "phantom-bitcoin"
The idea is very idiotic. "Phantom-btc" tanks and burns the minute trading starts ...
PM me; i'll sell you 5 Phantom-BTC for every 0.5 btc you send me. Easy 10-begger for you. Just let me know how much you want to order. We'll deliver any size of trade.
Get rich quick with "phantom-bitcoin"
Early this morning the Coinbase exchange went down and stayed down for hours. It was ddos.
What motivated the attackers, does it have something to do with the block size conflict?
What motivated the attackers, does it have something to do with the block size conflict?
They were trading a lot lower than other exchanges today. Looked very much like price manipulation to me. Great someone took it on. My best guess is: attacker saw this too and decided to put them on standby for a while to protect the marketcap of bitcoin.
Re: Whats the Deal with Altcoins that Have a Market Cap under $1,000?
Well this kind of indicates no interest, so even if you bought up all of the coins there are probably no people who want to buy them. So you'd be wasting your money.
People want them as soon as price goes up consitently. No matter what shit it is.
Though: When shit is that low it mostly has a reason to be.
Re: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)
https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/680902843784544256
Good.Quote
Coinbase is now running BitcoinXT (BIP101) in production as an experiment, blog post w more details coming soon
http://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/software
I prefer Bitcoin Plus, Bitcoin Scrypt and Bitcoin2 ...