Hey everyone

I know a lot of people have shown concern over Pharma's seemingly ridiculous hashrate. Out of safety I double checked the code to ensure that I did not miss anything. I'm glad to announce that I still have not found any problems with the code and stand by my original review and it's A rating for no problems with the code.

I don't know where the insane hashrate is coming from, but it is legitimate and the difficulty level of the coin is correct.

Instant/0 Confirms would be nice, but I would imagine it would require a coin swap etc which I am really trying to avoid.  If it turns out that 0 confirmations are needed I will investigate this route and see if it can be implemented at a later date, I am just too busy this weekend to look into it in detail.

Remember, it is only 60seconds and if the inputs get double spent (i mean really? for such low treansactions ... $0.1-$5) then the ticket could easily be revoked with a notification on the app to say TX failed, resend or get revoked

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xph/address.dws?PKSufqohXBod562XzgDwvbwpun42uPxAWH.htm

I just want to point out that if this is the dev's address what they are doing with their coins is very non scammy.  The wallet has over 11 million coins and all it has done is stake or sit there.  If they wanted to they could make over 220!! masternodes with that.  Then they would control over 90% of the new coins coming into existence.  They are not doing that instead they are allowing people to jump in and make some good returns on the masternodes.  

Think about it if you were to make a buisness using a POS crypto you would NEED to control a large portion of the coin.  It has been shown that the largest wallets can eventually take control of a POS network time and time again.  Then there are the times like vericoin where an exchange gets hacked and all of a sudden a malicious entity has control of the largest wallet compromising your POS coin.  Any of these things would be disastrous to a company trying to settle trades in crypto therefore the first thing you would need to make sure of when doing a project like this is make sure you have control of your own coin and the majority of coins don't end up on some exchange wallet.

The fact the devs have a large wallet just sitting there encouraging others to make masternodes says something to me.  There has been no proof this coin is legit and none it is a scam.  But really come on people there are 4 people willing to put their face on this project which already makes it more legit then 99% of the coins that are out there.

Always shouting scam may save you from losing some money.  It may also stop you from recognizing the next 20 bagger.

Didn't Ron's post help last time?

Is there some code review planned for this coin ? It's probably pure genius but having official opinions from trusted crypto experts would be a must  

how 0 confirmation can be safely achieved ?
level of anonimity ?
etc...

most people can't understand how vnl works (me) and we need techy voices to explain it i think  

Not sure if I mentioned it here, but a Bitcoin dev I know is doing a code review for Vanillacoin. Funny thing, he was commenting in my group about some other coin he didn't approve of code-wise, and I explained I can't really do code reviews and I just go on the fundamentals. Anyway, he want's to help out the crypto scene and is working on the code review for Vanillacoin. Super technical and it will be a paper, but what I know so far is it definitely isn't a scam based on sheer amount of work, and he agrees it "shines" compared to most alts. He had some pros and cons, and I tried to explain it was still in progress and being worked on. Anyway, it was good enough news that I bought more.

When it is done I will publish on my website cryptocollectorsclub.com, and in the group link at the bottom of my sig. I asked him to do SDC next just as I have always been curious how good or bad the code is on that as well.

Dev, where are you?