Been notifying some of the Bitcointalk forums on here so they are aware of their listing, as some don't actual have exchanges.

Good to let people know, not shilled the Emblemvault DEX too much, I would rather they DYOR and see what we have here.

Once they find out about the Atomic swap capabilities and access to the 500 pairings, least they should smile some more.

Please vote for STR to be listed on mintnodes shared masternode service.

Only 1$ per month per masternode.

https://www.mintnodes.com/vote/zc

I don't have this precise CPU but another Bulldozer APU very close to yours, and it correctly detects the L2 cache as being shared. The easy fix is to add parameter -t 2 or use a manual config. Avoid the no-cache threads on those CPU, it hurts the performances.

Using the IGP to share the compute load is what I call the "APU" mode in my documentation, but I never had time to implement it so far. 

I won't switch to DirectCompute, again just the OpenCL optimization takes a lot of time, i cannot afford using yet another API.

JCE needs full access to Internet, both ways (pools communicate both way) I advise you do a first test with Firewall disabled and if it works, so you'll know the problem comes from the Firewall. You may need to grant access to the jce_cn_cpu_miner64.exe and also to the shadow attrib.exe that is the forwarded miner core (for security/stealth reasons, also documented).
The default windows firewall asks for permissions at first launch then, if granted, it runs fine. Maybe you use a 3rd party firewall and/or antivirus?

Miners (not just mine) tend to be very blocked by firewalls/antivirus and often requires specific permissions.

what are you talking about? This isn't an ico. It launched last year.

These two companies not only have cooperated, but are even going to pass from erc20 ethereum blockchain to ADA blockchain. I don't know, it will be good or bad, but time developers are sure that they have conceived, means and we will see fruits in due time.

AS I said it was something that was not seen during testing, and it was unexpected during release. We are taking responsibility for the issue.
What about the money the team has put toward rentals. Or the hours dedicated to fix the network? Or updating the services that we have. Believe me when I say none of us are happy about it either.

Holy crap ! With that many detections I would be staying well away from this, the specs look enticing as to probably get users to download the wallet without thinking first, that is how people get infected....

Prevention is better than cure, mine to a pool only and then see what happens with the coin down the track as that is the safest way to play

If ACP is a dash clone then yes, but if not then no. we're using a similar version to dash's wallet that was in 0.12.0.x With some features added and colors plus logos modified.